State court trials are likely to begin well before the first federal hair relaxer lawsuits go before a jury involving allegations that products caused women to develop uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries.
The retailers have only been named in a small number of uterine, endometrial or ovarian cancer lawsuits over hair relaxer side effects
Many hair relaxer lawsuits were filed by women without confirmed cancer diagnoses, due to fears their filings would be blocked by deadlines imposed by the U.S. bankruptcy court.
This is the latest in a series of massive catheter recalls in recent years, for a variety of defects that have endangered patients' health.
Defendants' motion to dismiss hair relaxer chemical class action lawsuits is inconsistent with the law, plaintiffs' attorneys argue.
Lawyers are scheduled to meet with the judge presiding over the hair relaxer lawsuits this week, as plaintiffs accuse manufacturers of engaging in an effort to unnecessarily delay the litigation and start of bellwether trials.
Motion to dismiss argues that the hair relaxer class action lawsuit does not involve plaintiffs who suffered an actual injury, and that the claims are preempted by federal law.
With more than 8,000 hair relaxer lawsuits moving forward in the federal court sytem, the parties continue to disagree on a number of issues, including which cases should be considered for early trial dates.
Industry lobbyists claim the study's findings may "unnecessarily scare" consumers, despite a lack of information on the potential health risks bottled water nanoplastics.
As parties finalize hair relaxer lawsuit bellwether protocol plans, which will be submitted by January 8, each individual plaintiff has been ordered to complete a fact sheet providing additional details about their injuries and products used
