UBS Class Action Lawsuit Filed over Lehman Brothers Structured Notes

|
AboutLawsuits

Add Your Comments

A class action lawsuit has been filed against UBS Financial Services, Inc. on behalf of all investors who were sold Lehman Brothers structured notes, also referred to as Lehman principal protection notes, by the brokerage firm.

The Lehman Brothers structured notes were a hybrid financial instrument, constructed from a combination of stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities and derivatives, which were sold as low-risk and safe investments.

UBS and a number of other brokerage firms sold the structured notes to retail investors with guaranteed principal protection from Lehman Brothers, which means that investors were assured that they would at least receive their initial investment back.

Do You Know about…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Do You Know About…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

When Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy protection on September 15, 2008, the guarantee that the principal would be protected became meaningless, and the Lehman notes are now essentially worthless.

Many investors have reported that they were sold these Lehman structured notes even during the months right before the bankruptcy filing, and they were provided no indication that the investment bank had a severely weakened financial position as a result of heavy investments in the subprime mortgage market.

The UBS class action suit was filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of all investors who were sold Lehman Brothers Principal Protection Notes by the brokerage firm. The complaint alleges that UBS brokers made false and misleading statements that omitted material facts about the risk associated with investing in the Lehman structured notes.

The lawsuit seeks to cancel the UBS investors’ purchases of the Lehman Brothers notes, and to allow the investors to recover what they paid for the securities.

Similar cases are also being pursued as arbitration claims against UBS and other brokerage firms for recommending the notes without disclosing the full extent of the risk. The Lehman Brothers structured note arbitration claims are being reviewed by lawyers for investors who lost over $50,000, regardless of which brokerage firm sold the security.

Tags: Financial Fraud, Lehman Brothers, Stock Broker Fraud, UBS
Image Credit: |

More Lawsuit Stories

53 Comments

cody
I have Lehman bonds purchased with UBS in the amt. of $38,000. In addition have a cd for $10,000. I don’t know if they are structured notes. Hard to say from the info I have.
donald
In a class action legal filing, doesn’t the law firm get the lion’s share of the money and the clients only a few cents on the dollar. Isn’t it better to file an independent action against UBS for arbitration?
Vivian
Are the Lehman preferred shares sold by UBS part of the lawsuit ? Or do you know if there is going to be a class action lawsuit over that? UBS had sent out a notice saying they had confidence in Lehman = I received it in the mail the day AFTER Lehman filed bankruptcy!
1 2

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis
A Dupixent cancer lawsuit claims the manufacturers failed to adequately test and label the eczema treatment, resulting in a CTCL cancer diagnosis.
MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUIT
Fourth Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Set for Oct. 2026
A federal judge has scheduled the fourth bellwether trial involving claims that Uber failed to protect passengers from being sexually assaulted by its drivers for early October.
Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial
Plaintiffs and defendants have submitted a joint schedule for a final pretrial conference before the second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial over claims the port catheter is defectively designed.