University Challenges Wrongful Death Lawsuit by Football Player’s Family

|

University of Central Florida (UCF) is attempting to avoid liability in a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of a student who died during football practice, arguing that a medical waiver he signed protects the school.

During a hearing Friday in Orlando Circuit Court, attorneys for the school and the family argued the merits of medical release forms and how much they can shield a school from liability. Following partial arguments, the hearing was continued and scheduled to resume on September 18, according to the Orlando Sentinel.

The case involves the death of Ereck Plancher, who was a 19 year-old freshman wide receiver for the university when he died on March 18 due to complications from sickle cell anemia brought on by the strain of a conditioning workout on campus. Plancherโ€™s family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the schoolโ€™s board of trustees and the UCF Athletics Association.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

UCF is seeking summary judgment dismissing the case because of two medical waivers signed before Plancher’s death. However, the plaintiffs argued that the university tested Plancher before his death and discovered he had sickle cell anemia, but did not inform him.

Sickle cell anemia has been known to cause sudden death in football players in the past. Although the school maintains that they did in fact inform Plancher of his condition, the plaintiffs have deposition testimony from UCFโ€™s head athletic trainer, who could not recall informing Plancher of his condition.

The plaintiffs also argued that Plancher did not really have a choice on whether to sign the schoolโ€™s waivers. Failing to do so meant that he would have lost his scholarship at UCF and would have been forced to sit a year out before being able to play at another school due to NCAA rules.

Another pending motion before Judge Maura T. Smith is a request that the UCFAA be considered a state agency, which would limit any settlement claim against it to $200,000 unless a higher amount was approved by the state legislature.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโ€™s chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.
A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.