Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
NHTSA Plans Major Update To Five-Star Safety Rating Program December 15, 2015 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Government highway safety officials have proposed substantial changes to the Five-Star Safety Rating program for new vehicles, which would include additional crash tests, pedestrian protection technologies, and crash avoidance and mitigation features that may encourage manufacturers to produce safer vehicles for U.S. roadways.ย On December 8, the U.S. Department of Transportationโs (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) brought forward a series of new safety feature proposals to be added to the NHTSA Five-Star Safety Rating for new vehicles. With the new safety features included in the rating system, consumers will be given better information to help them choose a safe vehicle and direct the automobile industry toward a safer future as technology based features continue to emerge, NHTSA officials claim. Do You Know about… Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The Five-Star Safety Ratings system, also known as the New Car Assessment Program, is a government safety rating for new vehicles entering the market that are tested at NHTSA research facilities. The vehicles are crash-tested and rated on how well they protect occupants in frontal, side and rollover crashes. The results from the tests are then organized into a rating system from โ1โ to โ5โ stars with 5 being the highest. These ratings appear on window stickers of new cars sold throughout the U.S. and serve as a reassurance for vehicle buyers that the vehicle they are purchasing is a safe choice. Consumers rely on the Five-Star Safety Rating system every day in new car purchases and even used car sales by researching the vehicle assessment at Safecar.gov where all testing results and ratings are compiled by the NHTSA. Over the past decade, as technology has advanced, the NHTSA has continued to increase vehicle safety through its use. The current safety rating program includes a checklist of advanced technology features including rear-visibility cameras, lane departure warnings, and forward collision warning sensors. The changes come in response to trends in accident reports across the nation, according to the NHTSA. With a majority of automobile accidents caused by driver error, the agency’s efforts have shifted to rely on technology-based approaches to decrease preventable crashes. In the NHTSAโs newest proposal, the agency has presented a series of high-tech changes to the Five-Star Safety Ratings that would include new tests to assess how well vehicles protect pedestrians from head, leg and pelvic injuries that occur when a pedestrian is struck by a vehicle. There would be new tests that will include a frontal oblique crash that will measure how well vehicle protect occupants in an angled frontal crash and a new frontal barrier crash test to analyze rear occupant safety. Aside from front crash tests, new crash test dummies that are more realistic and better for analyzing more realistic injury hazards have been proposed. The newly recommended dummies would allow researchers to define the genuine impacts a crash is likely to have on the human body. The proposal also seeks to grade the way vehicles receive software updates by implementing vehicle ratings on their ability to dynamically update programs more swiftly as new technology emerges. With vehicles more readily available for quicker safety software updates, the length of recalls or dealer services would be cut down significantly. Lastly, the NHTSA is proposing the Five-Star Ratings be measured in full and half-star increments to provide customers more discriminating information about the vehicles safety performance. In early November, the NHTSA announced that all vehicles eligible for the nationally recognized 5-Star Rating System must be equipped with automatic emergency braking (AEB) technology by 2018, in an effort to encourage more automakers to incorporate preventable rear-end collision systems. On November 2, the NHTSA issued a federal register notice upgrading its 5-Star Rating System to include AEB as a recommended safety technology in 2018. U.S Transportation Secretary, Anthony Fox stated that AEB technology will substantially enhance safety, especially with the number of distracted drivers on the road. The AEB technology includes systems designed to prevent collisions in which the driver does not react fast enough or does not apply sufficient braking power to avoid or mitigate a crash. The AEB systems use multiple on-vehicle sensors such as radar, cameras, and lasers to detect potential crash threats. The systems are designed to recognize collision threats from these sensors and engage the vehicleโs brakes if the driver does not react quickly enough or apply enough braking power. For customers potentially purchasing a new vehicle, the NHTSA has created a new AEB information page on www.safecar.gov/AEB to explain and better help the public understand how the systems work and the benefits of purchasing vehicles equipped with the technology. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Auto Accident Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-502846p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">TFoxFoto</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a> More Lawsuit Stories Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL March 20, 2026 Additional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 March 20, 2026 DeWalt Miter Saw Lawsuit Claims Safety Features Failed, Caused Injury March 20, 2026 0 Comments PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (Posted: today) Both Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific are fighting against a call by plaintiffs to consolidate all spinal cord stimulator lawsuits before one federal judge for pretrial proceedings. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Problems Resulted in Burning Pain, Shocks From SCS Leads: Lawsuit (03/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (03/10/2026)Lawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026) Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (Posted: yesterday) More than 4,000 women across the U.S. have filed product liability lawsuits and medical monitoring class action claims seeking compensation for potential brain tumor symptoms and side effects allegedly caused by Depo-Provera. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)Nearly 4,000 Women Are Pursuing a Depo-Provera Lawsuit After Developing Brain Tumors (03/04/2026)Long-Term Side Effects of Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma and Hearing Loss, Lawsuit Says (02/26/2026) Uber Settlements Reached To Resolve Certain Sexual Assault Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago) Plaintiffs in Uber driver sexual assault lawsuits have asked a federal judge to approve a Common Benefit Funds motion, which is usually a sign of some form of settlement agreement. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Sexual Assault MDL Judge Considered Expanding Jury Pool in Next Bellwether Trial (03/10/2026)MDL Judge Confirms Next Uber Assault Lawsuit Will Go Before Jury in April 2026 (02/17/2026)Lyft Sexual Assault MDL Established in Northern District of California (02/09/2026)
Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (Posted: today) Both Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific are fighting against a call by plaintiffs to consolidate all spinal cord stimulator lawsuits before one federal judge for pretrial proceedings. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Problems Resulted in Burning Pain, Shocks From SCS Leads: Lawsuit (03/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (03/10/2026)Lawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)
Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (Posted: yesterday) More than 4,000 women across the U.S. have filed product liability lawsuits and medical monitoring class action claims seeking compensation for potential brain tumor symptoms and side effects allegedly caused by Depo-Provera. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)Nearly 4,000 Women Are Pursuing a Depo-Provera Lawsuit After Developing Brain Tumors (03/04/2026)Long-Term Side Effects of Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma and Hearing Loss, Lawsuit Says (02/26/2026)
Uber Settlements Reached To Resolve Certain Sexual Assault Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago) Plaintiffs in Uber driver sexual assault lawsuits have asked a federal judge to approve a Common Benefit Funds motion, which is usually a sign of some form of settlement agreement. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Sexual Assault MDL Judge Considered Expanding Jury Pool in Next Bellwether Trial (03/10/2026)MDL Judge Confirms Next Uber Assault Lawsuit Will Go Before Jury in April 2026 (02/17/2026)Lyft Sexual Assault MDL Established in Northern District of California (02/09/2026)