Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Delayed Volvo Recalls Results in $1.5M NHTSA Fine July 12, 2012 Ricky Allen Add Your CommentsSwedish automaker Volvo will have to pay $1.5 million dollars for being too slow in conducting recall campaigns, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported Tuesday.ย According to a NHTSA press release, the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act requires all auto manufacturers to notify the federal regulators within five business days of determining that a safety defect exists or that the manufacturer is not in compliance with federal motor vehicle safety standards โ and to promptly conduct a recall.After Volvo discovered issues with incorrect tire pressure labeling, defective airbag deployments and stalling issues, which led to the recall of roughly 32,000 vehicles between 2010 and 2012, the auto maker reportedly failed to take timely actions.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe largest delayed recall included 11,168 Volvo S60, XC60, S80 and XC70 vehicles from the 2012 model year, which were found to have a wire harnesses under the front seats that may not have been attached properly. As a result, when the seats are moved, the wire may be disconnected, which could result in the airbags deploying improperly or not at all.Earlier this year, Volvo reported it had 182 warranty claims involving the problem, but no crashes. Deliveries and shipments at ports and factories were halted in October 2011, to check and secure wires. However, the company did not officially recall any vehicles for another four months.Although Volvo eventually alerted consumers about the problems, the NHTSA determined that Volvoโs handling of the situation was slow.A January 2011 investigation evaluated how fast the situation was handled and found evidence that Volvo failed to report the defects and noncompliance to the agency in accordance with federal law.Volvo Cars North America will pay $1.5 million in U.S. fines to settle claims that the company failed to report safety defects in a timely manner in seven recall campaigns since 2010. The company has apologized for the delays and indicates that it will work to improve its recall procedures and emphasized that there were no injuries or crashes connected to any of the recalls.As part of the settlement, NHTSA stated Volvo Cars North America, LLC and its parent company Volvo Car Corporation, have agreed to make internal changes to its recall decision-making process to ensure timely reporting to consumers and the federal government in the future.Volvo denied wrongdoing in the settlement, but agreed to pay the fine.Photo Courtesy of draco2008 via Flickr/CC 2.0 Tags: Auto Recall, VolvoMore Lawsuit Stories Nova Kratom Lawsuit Alleges Addictive Products Caused Cardiac Injury and Dependence August 13, 2026 Lawsuits Over TDF Drug Injuries Dismissed After California Supreme Court Ruling August 13, 2026 Syfovre, Izervay Side Effects May Thicken Retinal Nerves, Research Warns August 13, 2026 1 Comments courtney September 28, 2012 I own a volvo s60 & i ve been dealing with a number of problems. NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (Posted: yesterday)C.R. Bard and its Becton Dickinson parent company face more than 3,700 Bard PowerPort lawsuits that claim the port catheters are defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026) Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 2 days ago)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026) Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)
Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (Posted: yesterday)C.R. Bard and its Becton Dickinson parent company face more than 3,700 Bard PowerPort lawsuits that claim the port catheters are defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026)
Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 2 days ago)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)
Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)