Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Wearable Cardioverter–Defibrillators Failed To Reduce Risk Of Death For Recent Heart Attack Patients: Study October 4, 2018 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsThe findings of new research suggests that wearable defibrillators do not appear to provide any extra protection against death for patients who recently suffered a heart attack. In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on September 27, researchers who were part of the VEST clinical trials indicate that they failed to find a lower rate of heart-related deaths among patients who were given wearble cardioverter-defibrillators up to three months following a heart attack.Patients with a low ejection fraction who have recently suffered a myocardial infarction are at a higher risk of death. While such patients may eventually be implanted with a heart device, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are contraindicated until 40 to 90 days after a heart attack.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know About…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONIn this new study, researchers sought to see if the wearable devices would reduce the risk of death among those patients. They conducted a clinical trial known as VEST, which was funded by the National Institutes of Health and Zoll Medical. The study involved 2,302 participants, 1,524 assigned to the device group and 778 assigned to a control group.According to the findings, arrhythmic death occurred in 1.6% of patients wearing the defibrillators, compared to 2.4% in the control group. Of the 48 in the device group who died, 12 were wearing the defibrillator at the time of death. The device delivered appropriate shocks to 20 participants in the device group, or about 1.3%, and delivered inappropriate shocks to nine study participants, or 0.6% of the device group.“Among patients with a recent myocardial infarction and an ejection fraction of 35% or less, the wearable cardioverter–defibrillator did not lead to a significantly lower rate of the primary outcome of arrhythmic death than control,” the researchers concluded.Earlier this year, Zoll Medical, one of the backers of the study, had to issue a Zoll LifeVest 4000 recall after it was discovered that the devices may stop supplying life-saving shock treatments. At least one fatality was linked to the recall, which sparked an FDA safety communication on January 17.The recalled vests are wearable cardioverter defibrillators used to treat life-threatening abnormal heartbeats in adults and children that are at risk of sudden-cardiac arrest and not candidates for an implantable defibrillator.The devices are designed to continuously monitor the patient’s heart and, in the event a fast, or life-threatening heart rhythm is detected, will deliver a shock treatment to restore the patient’s heart beat to a normal rhythm. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Defibrillator, External Defibrillator, Heart Attack, Heart Rhythm, Medical Device Recall, Zoll LifeVestMore Lawsuit Stories Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use June 17, 2026 Roblox, Snapchat, Discord Lawsuit Alleges Platforms Work in Tandem To Exploit Children June 17, 2026 Boston Scientific Pelvic Mesh Lawsuit Claims Advantage System Caused Permanent Injury, Deformity June 17, 2026 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: today)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026) Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (Posted: 2 days ago)A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)
Boston Scientific Pelvic Mesh Lawsuit Claims Advantage System Caused Permanent Injury, Deformity June 17, 2026
Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: today)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (Posted: 2 days ago)A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)