RSS
TwitterFacebook

Wright Profemur Hip Lawsuit Centralization Sought in Federal MDL

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

With dozens of product liability lawsuits pending throughout the federal court system involving problems with Wright Profemur hip implants, several plaintiffs are requesting that the litigation to be centralized before one judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Wright Medical Technology and MicroPort Orthopedics, Inc. face at least 42 complaints in 25 different U.S. District Courts, each involving plaintiffs who experienced complications after the Profemur Modular necks and Profemur femoral stems were used together in a total hip replacement system.

Unlike traditional hip replacement systems, which feature a single femoral component, the Wright Profemur hip stem features two modular pieces, which allow the implant to be adjusted for leg length. However, problems with the modular hip design have plagued the Wright Profemur system, leading to reports of corrosion as the metal pieces rub against each other during normal daily activities. Plaintiffs claim that the design is prone to fracture and fail at the femoral neck stem.

On May 18, a Motion to Transfer (PDF) with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict litigation, calling for all lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide to be consolidated as part of a Wright Profemur MDL, which would help avoid duplicative discovery, prevent contradictory rulings from different judges, and serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses, and the courts.

“Movants allege in their complaints that the taper of the Profemur modular neck and female bore of the Profemur modular femoral stems were defectively designed and/or manufactured and promote fretting and corrosion at the junction of the modular neck and the femoral stem, which results in personal injury and the need for revision surgery,” the motion states. “In addition, each plaintiff alleges Defendants knew or should have known of the defective nature of these hip implant components, and yet failed to properly warn doctors and patients and failed to timely remove the products from the market when it knew of the dangers associated with these products.”

The Wright Profemur Total Hip System was one of the first modular hip implant designs.

Several years ago, the manufacturer faced several hundred Wright Profemur hip lawsuits, filed by individuals who said their devices failed within a few years, alleging that the system featured an unreasonably dangerous design which resulted in fractures, breaks, degradation, fretting, failures and the need for revision surgery.

A number of Wright Profemur hip lawsuits went to trial, one of which resulted in a $4.5 million verdict by a California state court jury. Several other claims were settled before they went to trial.

In the motion to transfer, plaintiffs request for the federal litigation ti be consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

If U.S. JPML agrees to centralize the cases, it is likely the judge will establish a “bellwether” process, where a group of representative claims will be prepared for early trial dates to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be presented throughout other cases. While the outcome for these early trials would not be binding on other plaintiffs, they may facilitate Wright Profemur hip settlements that would avoid the need for dozens, or possibly hundreds, of additional trials to be scheduled throughout the federal court system.

Tags: , ,

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact A Lawyer

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.