Discovery Continuing in Zantac Lawsuits Over Cancer Caused By Heartburn Drug

The U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal Zantac lawsuits has outlined a discovery process that will continue over the next two years, involving thousands of claims filed by former users who indicate the recalled heartburn caused them to develop cancer.

Each of the complaints raise similar allegations, indicating manufacturers of name-brand Zantac, generic ranitidine and over-the-counter versions of the medication failed to warn that the active pharmaceutical ingredient is inherently unstable and converts to high levels of a cancer-causing chemical byproduct, known as N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA).

Formers users indicate they could have avoided a diagnosis of breast cancer, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, stomach cancer and other cancers associated with use of the blockbuster medication, which was one of the top selling brand-name drugs for decades before it was pulled from the market last year.

ZANTAC LAWSUITS

Did you or a loved one take recalled Zantac?

Side effects of Zantac may increase the risk of cancer, due to chemical impurities found in the heartburn drug.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

To avoid duplicative discovery into common issues in the cases, the Zantac litigation was centralized earlier this year before U.S. District Judge Robin L. Rosenberg in the Southern District of Florida, as part of a federal MDL, or multidistrict litigation.

While the claims remain at the earliest stages of the proceedings, the parties have advised Judge Rosenberg that issues related to the scope of discovery remain unresolved at this time.

In an order (PDF) issued earlier this month, the Court indicated the court will establish a series of deadlines to help the parties in prioritizing discovery and focusing attention on resolving key disputes that may be helpful in advancing the litigation.

“It appears that the overall progress of this MDL litigation, and the ability to comply with the case management schedule, may benefit from the expeditious resolution of one or more of these discovery issues at this time,” the judge wrote.

The Court set aside time for a discovery hearing that may be held in the next few weeks, which will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart to resolve the most significant issues.

As part of the coordinated management of the litigation, it is expected that Judge Rosenberg will establish a “bellwether” program, where small groups of representative cases will be prepared for a series of early trial dates that are unlikely to begin until at least 2022. While the outcome of these early trial dates will not be binding on other claims in the litigation, they may have a large impact on potential Zantac settlements the drug makers may negotiate for certain cancers, to avoid thousands of individual cases going before juries nationwide in coming years.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Master Baby Food Lawsuit Filed in MDL Outlines How Toxic Metals Caused Autism, ADHD in Children
Master Baby Food Lawsuit Filed in MDL Outlines How Toxic Metals Caused Autism, ADHD in Children (Posted yesterday)

Plaintiffs have submitted a baby food lawsuit Master Complaint that is expected to streamline the filing of lawsuits alleging that toxic heavy metals in Beech-Nut, Gerber, Hain and Nurture products caused ADHD, autism and other developmental disorders.

Lawsuit Claims AGGA Device Damaged Teeth, Resulting in Disfiguring Injury
Lawsuit Claims AGGA Device Damaged Teeth, Resulting in Disfiguring Injury (Posted yesterday)

Another AGGA device lawsuit has been filed by a man who says he had to have the device surgically removed less than a year after having it implanted due to jaw problems and migraines.