Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Following Zantac Recalls, Drug Maker Deleted Emails In Violation of Preservation Orders May 12, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsAs tens of thousands of Zantac lawsuits move through the discovery phase, plaintiffs who developed cancer following use of the recalled heartburn drug indicate Sanofi allowed the widespread and improper deletion of emails and other evidence, in violation of preservation orders issued by the Court.Sanofi and other drug makers started to issue Zantac recalls in late 2019, after independent researchers discovered the active pharmaceutical ingredient ranitidine may convert to high levels of a potent human carcinogen, known as N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA).More than 70,000 former users have already stepped forward to claim they developed cancer following use of the drugs, alleging the drug makers knew or should have known for decades ranitidine was inherently unstable and converts to the cancer-causing chemical byproduct when stored at high temperatures or as it passes through the body.Stay Up-to-Date AboutZantac LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits, and safety warnings that may impact your family, including any new Zantac lawsuit updates or legal developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutZantac LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits, and safety warnings that may impact your family, including any new Zantac lawsuit updates or legal developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreWhile the parties work to complete discovery about what the drug makers knew and when they knew it, plaintiffs learned Sanofi destroyed employee emails and other documents which may have provided important evidence in the case. The destruction, which plaintiffs described as โwidespread,โ violated three preservation orders by the Court dating back to November 2019.โSanofiโs counsel provided a โreportโ to Plaintiffs on February 19, 2021, concerning its root cause investigation, recovery and remedial positions,โ according to a memorandum (PDF) submitted last week. โOn March 1, 2021, Plaintiffs requested documents, information, and discovery concerning the conditions, circumstances, and events that led to the destruction of many custodiansโ emails during a critical timeframe in this litigation, but it was not until this week that Sanofi agreed to allow that discovery process to proceed.โGiven common allegations and claims raised in complaints filed through the federal court system, the Zantac litigation is currently centralized before U.S. District Judge Robin L. Rosenberg in the Southern District of Florida, who is presiding over the coordinated discovery and plans for a small group of “bellwether” cases to go to trial next year, to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the claims.Plaintiffs indicate the destruction of emails and documents relevant to the Zantac recalls has caused delays in preparing their case, and that other drug makers have also taken actions which have slowed down the discovery process. For example, more than 80% of GlaxoSmithKlineโs initial document production last summer was redacted, according to the filing. And in February, GlaxoSmithKline informed plaintiffs it โmistakenlyโ had failed to run extremely basic search terms, such as “Zantac” and “NDMA” on its document archives.As result of the delays, they have asked the court to modify previously issued pretrial schedules, to allow more time to review new documents and prepare their expert reports.โDefendantsโ documents contain indispensable information from clinical trials, adverse events, laboratory testing, root cause analyses, and other key science that experts need to form their opinions,โ the memorandum states. โIt is obvious, therefore, that Plaintiffs need the ability to review those same documents to properly counter the defenses in this litigation. Remarkably, those documents have still not all been collected, reviewed, and produced, and the ones that have been produced came extremely late.โZantac Cancer RisksThe Zantac litigation may become one of the largest active mass tort claims over the next few years, given the widespread use of the heartburn and acid reflux drug for decades before it was removed from the market late last year.Public concerns about theย Zantac cancer riskย first emerged in September 2019, when an online pharmacy discovered that each pill may expose users to levels of NDMA that are drastically higher than the permissible and safe. The FDA has previously found that the daily safe limit for NDMA exposure is only 96 nanograms (ng). However, pills tested by the independent pharmacy found that users may be exposed to more than 3 million nanograms from each Zantac pill.Investigations have confirmed the problems were not caused by contamination or changes in the manufacturing process, but appear to be part of the inherent molecular structure of the active pharmaceutical ingredient in Zantac, ranitidine.Plaintiffs allege the manufacturers of Zantac knew or should have known about these problems for decades, yet aggressively marketed and sold brand-name prescription, generic and over-the-counter versions of Zantac for years, without warning users that it may cause them to develop cancer.If the parties fail to reach Zantac settlements or another resolution for the cases following discovery and bellwether trials held before Judge Rosenberg, thousands of individual cases may end up remanded back to U.S. District Courts nationwide for individual trial dates in the coming years. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Drug Recall, GlaxoSmithKline, Heartburn, Heartburn Drug, NDMA, Sanofi, ZantacMore Zantac Lawsuit Stories Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed More Than 5 Years After Recall June 18, 2025 Jury Hears Zantac Cancer Evidence in Illinois Trial Against Boehringer Ingelheim February 5, 2025 Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Trial Ends With Hung Jury in California November 22, 2024 0 CommentsNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026) Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 3 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026) Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (Posted: 4 days ago)A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamicsโ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITSmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Womanโs Body (05/15/2026)18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026)
Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 3 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026)
Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (Posted: 4 days ago)A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamicsโ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITSmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Womanโs Body (05/15/2026)18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)