Zimmer Peek Ardis Inserter Recall Issued Due to Breakages

Irvin Jackson

Add Your Comments

Zimmer has recalled a medical device used during spinal fusion surgery, indicating that it may break inside patients’ bodies, causing internal injuries and blood loss. 

On December 20, the FDA posted information about a Zimmer PEEK Ardis Inserter recall that was issued after the manufacturer, Zimmer Spine, received reports of the devices breaking during surgery.

Although there have been no post-operative complaints regarding the breakages, Zimmer warns that the fractured implants could cause dural tears and blood loss.

Do You Know about…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Do You Know About…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

The Zimmer PEEK Ardis Inserter is used to implant the PEEK Ardis Interbody Spacer, a device used in posterior spinal fusion procedures. Zimmer estimates from reports that the inserters appear to be breaking at a rate of about 0.52 percent, or one out of roughly every 200.

The recall affects all lots of the PEEK Ardis Inserter, including inserters in the Ardis Instrument Set with part number 3256-01 and Specialty Ardis Inserters with part numbers 07.00780.701, 07.00780.702, 07.00900.702, 650-0176-01, 650-0179-01, 650-0208-01, 650-0239-01, 650-0263-01, 650-0293-01, 650-0297-01, 650-0351-01, 650-0351-02, and 650-0365-01. The part number and lot number are located on the inserters. The recalled medical devices were distributed from June 2008 through December 2012. About half were distributed in the U.S. and the rest were sold around the world.

Zimmer’s spinal subsidiary has warned surgeons and hospitals worldwide to immediately stop using the PEEK Ardis Inserter and return any in their inventory to Zimmer Spine. This also means that the PEEK Ardis Interbody Spacer cannot be used either, since it cannot be implanted without the Inserter.

Customers and distributors are being notified of the recall by mail. Any health care professionals with questions can call (866)774-368, can visit the website at www.peekardis.zimmer.com or can send an email to qualitycompliance@zimmer.com. Patients with questions are advised to consult their health care provider.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Tags: Medical Device Recall, Zimmer

More Lawsuit Stories

2 Comments

Phyllis
2009 through 2014 i had 3back surgery. 2012 The peek cage hardware became “loose hardware”and was surgically removed from back.But in the process of the removed a screw broke off in my back bone. And I feel like I should had being told that had a Recall on the “Peek Cage”. I didn’t know about a recall on the product so I don’t it is fair to say my statue of limitations has expired.The I found about a recall on the product was in 2019 -2020.
Christopher
Received fusion (L5-S1) Oct 27, 2009. Had a break Oct 29, 2009. They PEEK cage was ‘repaired’ Nov 2, 2009. I have operative report and film. Not sure what broke or ‘anchor fastener’ broke or came loose 10/29/09.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims
Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL
A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.
Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks
A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.