3M Combat Arms Earplug Settlement Identification Phase Complete, and Submission of Eligible Claimant Registration Forms Will Soon Begin

A federal judge has determined that process for identifying all potential claimants who may participate in a recent $6 billion 3M Combat Arms earplug lawsuit settlement agreement has been completed, and the next phase will soon begin, allowing plaintiffs to submit registration forms to obtain compensation for hearing loss and tinnitus injuries.

The settlement seeks to resolve nearly 300,000 product liability lawsuits brought against 3M Company by U.S. military veterans, who say they suffered permanent hearing damage due to alleged design defects with the company’s Combat Arms earplugs, which were standard military issue for all service members between 2003 and 2015.

The veterans claim 3M Company, and it’s Aero Technologies subsidiary, knew the earplugs failed to properly seal the ear canal, yet continued to sell their product to the U.S. government, causing service members to be left without adequate ear protection during combat and training exercises.

Given common questions of fact and law raised in the litigation, all claims brought throughout the federal court system have been centralized for the past three and a half years before U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida, as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation.

Following a series of massive damage awards returned by juries in early cases that went to trial in the MDL, the manufacturer decided to pursue a controversial 3M earplug lawsuit bankruptcy plan last year, attempting to put its fully owned subsidiary Aearo Technologies into bankruptcy, even though 3M is a multi-billion dollar parent company that is well funded and directly profited from sale of the earplugs for years.

However, federal courts repeatedly shot down the earplug manufacturer’s attempts, saying the filings were not made in good faith, and that the company faced no financial distress from the lawsuits that would warrant bankruptcy protection.

3M Combat Arms Earplug Settlement

With thousands of potential trials likely to be scheduled over the next year, which could result in massive liability awards, 3M Company offered a $6 billion Combat Arms earplug lawsuit settlement (PDF) on August 28, which seeks to resolve the litigation and prevent the federal court system from being flooded with hundreds of thousands of trials in the coming years. However, there remain some questions about whether enough individual plaintiffs will agree to accept the settlement, which would be paid over the course of five years.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

In the days after the settlement was announced, Judge Rodgers issued a case management order (PDF) detailing how the Court intended to protect plaintiffs from predatory settlement lending companies, which often advance money at extremely high interest rates once a settlement is announced. In addition, the Court also issued an order (PDF) describing how those who do not wish to participate in the settlement can proceed with individual lawsuits.

On September 23, the latest 3M earplug settlement update was issued by the Court, announcing in a case management order (PDF) that the identification phase of the program is now complete. Judge Rodgers indicated that the “process for Eligible Claimants to submit Registration Forms, including required signatures and attachments, will soon begin.”

Earplug Settlement Amount Concerns

While the parties move forward with the settlement claim process, there remain questions over whether enough veterans will approve of the deal to sign on.

Plaintiffs have six months from August 29 to accept or opt-out of the agreement, however some have questioned whether the settlement amount, which comes to about $24,000 per plaintiff paid out across five years, is adequate to address permanent hearing loss and tinnitus injuries. If less than 98% of plaintiffs agree to the settlement, the deal may fall apart.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior legal and investigative journalist with more than 30 years of experience covering complex issues at the intersection of law, politics, and environmental policy. He began his reporting career in 1991 after graduating from Wayne.




56 Comments


John
Why are they not paying the V.A. these monies to distro according to service member’s already documented hearing loss ? No lawyers needed. And no soldier is left out. Sound judgment? Yes. Geez

Erik
I just read this article and you have got to be kidding me 24,000 that is a direct insult to all the claimants in my eyes. I personally would not settle for this pathetic amount.

Gerardo
I don’t know where you went to school, but last time I checked a Billion has 9 zeroes. And about 300.000 vets are involved. You mean to tell the world that each claim is only getting 24 grand? You better get some that knows math because your full of Caca. And you all wonder why we have a hard time trusting people!

David
24k for being permanently hearing impaired when several litigants in the MDL were awarded 10’s of millions ?! These people must think some of us are stupid !

Brian
I have something to add to this if you don’t mind. I was affected by this 3m ear plugs , and how do they come up with an average 24,000 pay out for what we have gone through and will for life ? We will never get our hearing back and constantly listen to ringing in our ears. To me it’s not right.

Jamal
I am a veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom and I suffer from tinnitus in my ears, and I have try to beco.e part of the 3M claim but with no success. I could not find a law firm that would represent me in the case. Does anyone know if and how I could still become part of this case?

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

The first BioZorb lawsuit set to go before a jury in early September will involve claims that a woman had to undergo an unplanned mastectomy due to complications.
A federal judge is calling on lawyers for plaintiffs and defendants to address concerns about thousands of potentially unfiled AFFF lawsuits, which could affect settlement negotiations.