3M Payment of $1B in Stock To Settle Earplug Lawsuits Deemed Fair by U.S. Judge
The U.S. District Judge presiding over all 3M earplug lawsuits has approved the use of $1 billion in stock to help fund settlement payouts for hundreds of thousands of outstanding claims for military veterans left with permanent hearing loss and tinnitus, determining that the use of stock to partially fund a $6 billion settlement agreement is fair and appropriate.
The settlement seeks to resolve nearly 300,000 product liability lawsuits brought against 3M Company by U.S. military veterans, who say they suffered permanent hearing damage due to alleged design defects with the company’s Combat Arms earplugs, which were standard military issue for all service members between 2003 and 2015.
The veterans claim 3M Company, and it’s Aero Technologies subsidiary, knew the earplugs failed to properly seal the ear canal, yet continued to sell their product to the U.S. government, causing service members to be left without adequate ear protection during combat and training exercises.
Did You Know?
Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled
Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.Learn More
Given common questions of fact and law raised in the litigation, all claims brought throughout the federal court system have been centralized for the past three and a half years before U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida, as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation. However, there are also a number of cases pending in state courts of Minnesota, where 3M’s headquarters are located.
Following a series of massive damage awards returned by juries in early cases that went to trial in the MDL, the manufacturer ultimately agreed to pay $6 billion to settle the earplug lawsuits, which will be funded over a five year period. However, the deal allowed up to $1 billion of the earplug settlement to be funded in the form of stock in 3M Company, which has raised concerns among some claimants.
Judge Approves Fairness of $1 Billion 3M Stock Sale
As part of the settlement, 3M will fund the deal between 2023 and 2029, with all consideration, including any 3M stock, deposited into a settlement fund before it is distributed to claimants under terms of the agreement. Judge Rodgers held a fairness hearing on December 11, to determine whether the stock sale should be allowed.
In a court order (PDF) issued on December 31, the Court concluded that the stock issuances are fair, allowing the deal to go forward if 98% of plaintiffs agree to the settlement deal.
“Assuming the 98% Participation Level is reached and 3M does not, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the foregoing $1 billion in cash in lieu of issuing stock, 3M will issue shares of common stock to the Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”), established pursuant to this Court’s order, ECF No. 3856, in four separate tranches (the “Stock Issuances”) equal to $1 billion,” Judge Rodgers concluded.
Rules for Opting Out of 3M Earplug Settlement
While the parties move forward with the settlement claim process, there remain questions over whether enough veterans will approve of the deal to sign on.
Plaintiffs were given six months from August 29 to accept or opt-out of the agreement, which is expected to pay an average of about $24,000 per plaintiff, which has been criticized by some as insufficient compensation for permanent hearing loss and tinnitus injuries. If less than 98% of plaintiffs agree to the settlement, the deal may fall apart.
In a case management order (PDF) issued on December 28, Judge Rodgers indicates that plaintiffs who do not elect to participate in the agreement by January 15 must transition their cases from the administrative docket to the active docket by January 22, 2024.
Those who fail to strictly comply with that deadline and others that will follow after that date, such as deadlines for preservation of documents, status conferences and mediation, will result in dismissal with prejudice without further notice.
Get more articles like this sent directly to your inbox.
"*" indicates required fields
Gysgt kevinJanuary 11, 2024 at 11:30 am
I have, asked that I be included with the 3M lawsuit, long time ago. And I have not heard a single reply from anyone, I now havecto pay for my bilateral hearing devices. Who can I speak with concerning my hearing loss,
DickensJanuary 11, 2024 at 3:04 am
Am a ugandan worked with american from 2006_2010 at balad airbase iraq. May I know if we non US Citizens gonna benefit from that settlement? Or how can I apply for that coz I was also affected. Secondly I heard of burnout, is there anyway I can apply?.
MuhammadJanuary 7, 2024 at 2:50 pm
I'm a veteran that served in the US navy from 2000-2005 and used 3m earplugs. I have a va service connected disability (tinnitus) I need to know if it's too late to file for this 3m lawsuit?
ThomasJanuary 6, 2024 at 11:00 am
$24k, that's well over twice what my attorney told me I'd get. I'd like to know what attorney the people who are getting paid $24k used. My attorney (Baron Budd and Associates) told me via email I'd get $10k and lose over 40% to attorney fees. I've been trying to contact them via phone to ask why is my settlement so low considering I've got hearing loss, tinnitus and vertigo all because of these e[Show More]$24k, that's well over twice what my attorney told me I'd get. I'd like to know what attorney the people who are getting paid $24k used. My attorney (Baron Budd and Associates) told me via email I'd get $10k and lose over 40% to attorney fees. I've been trying to contact them via phone to ask why is my settlement so low considering I've got hearing loss, tinnitus and vertigo all because of these ear plugs and I'm only going to get maybe $6k which is a joke for dealing with a lifetime of just tinnitus, much less the hearing loss or vertigo. I hate people who scam people and it's even worse to scam veterans who risked our lives to protect this country that allows it's veterans to get scammed.
RussellJanuary 5, 2024 at 11:17 am
I'm 61 years old now by the time the lawyers get their share and make more money than the veterans and I call that highway robbery that's veterans have served for this country have died for this country that have been hurt in many engagements using the 3M air plugs and we still got screwed for a measly 24,000 by the time the attorney gets through with it they get their percentage you might as well[Show More]I'm 61 years old now by the time the lawyers get their share and make more money than the veterans and I call that highway robbery that's veterans have served for this country have died for this country that have been hurt in many engagements using the 3M air plugs and we still got screwed for a measly 24,000 by the time the attorney gets through with it they get their percentage you might as well take it to the casino and double down your money cuz you got to pay taxes on it 3M extreme what really gets me a lot of us who were in aviation they say that mild to compare to other veterans who might have been Ground Pounders when some of us were federal employees that air bases to where the big c-135 flew over every single day while we work outside and while we were close to the wine engines for the uh 60 Blackhawk we're just 24,000 pretty bad when the lawyers and attorneys get more money than the veterans they should have set aside two more billion dollars just to pay these guys off one pissed off veteran I still have ringing in my ears yeah I agreed with my lawyer to go ahead with his settlement through the fact I'll probably die before I see it they should have went for 10 billion dollars and gave everyone of the 300,000 a million dollars a piece you can get it over with cuz half of those people like me will probably be dead before we see a dime I already had a lawyer I don't need another one to get your percentage
More Top Stories
A federal judge has scheduled the initial status conference for coordinated GLP-1 RA drug stomach paralysis lawsuit pretrial proceedings for March 14.
U.S. government attorneys now say they want each plaintiff in a Camp Lejeune lawsuit to prove specific causation, which seems to run counter to the intent of the law passed by Congress.
Those seeking to apply for leadership positions in Suboxone injury lawsuits have until March 1 to file with the court.