Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Trial Over Fosamax Jaw Damage Set to Begin April 19 in New York February 3, 2010 Staff Writers Add Your CommentsA federal judge has denied attempts by Merck & Co. to have a Fosamax lawsuit thrown out, clearing the way for an April 19 trial to move forward involving allegations that the plaintiff developed permanent and debilitating jaw damage from Fosamax side effects.The case, filed by Louise H. Maley, will be the second Fosamax trial to reach a jury out of hundreds of cases that are currently pending against Merck involving allegations that they failed to adequately research their osteoporosis drug and warn about the risk of a rare jaw condition, known as osteonecrosis of the jaw.A prior trial, involving a lawsuit over jaw damage from Fosamax filed by Shirley Boles, ended in a mistrial last year, after the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict. It is anticipated that the Boles case will be retried later this year.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know About…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBoth cases were chosen as “bellwether” trials because they would be used to evaluate how juries respond to the evidence in the Fosamax litigation. A third “bellwether” case, involving a lawsuit filed by Bessie Fleming, was dismissed in November, after the Court determined that the plaintiff would be unable to establish that Fosamax caused her jaw damage.Merck tried to have Maley’s lawsuit dismissed as well, arguing that she could not show specific causation between Fosamax and jaw injuries that developed after taking the drug for eight years. However, in a ruling issued last week, U.S. District Judge John Keenan disagreed and ruled that Maley has enough evidence to allow the case to be presented to a jury.Judge Keenan indicated in his order that Maley’s trial over Fosamax jaw damage will begin on April 19, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in Manhattan.There are currently more than 900 similar Fosamax jaw damage lawsuits pending against the Merck & Co., and lawyers will be closely watching how the jury in the Maley trial respond to evidence that is likely to be presented throughout many of the other cases.Fosamax (alendronate sodium), is a member of a class of drugs known as bisphosphonates, and is prescribed for treatment of osteoporosis. Fosamax was approved by FDA in October 1995, and has been used by more than 20 million people. The drug generated over $3 billion in annual sales for Merck before it became available as a generic last year. Tags: Fosamax, Jaw Necrosis, Merck, Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Image Credit: |More Fosamax Lawsuit Stories Fosamax Fracture Lawsuits Dismissed Again, After Judge Rules FDA Rejected Label Warning Change March 24, 2022 Zometa Side Effects Increase Risk of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Study January 14, 2021 Study Questions Whether Fosamax And Similar Bone Drugs Provide Benefits After Seven Years of Use December 10, 2020 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: today)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026) Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: yesterday)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026) AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 4 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)
Fosamax Fracture Lawsuits Dismissed Again, After Judge Rules FDA Rejected Label Warning Change March 24, 2022
Study Questions Whether Fosamax And Similar Bone Drugs Provide Benefits After Seven Years of Use December 10, 2020
Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: today)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)
Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: yesterday)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)
AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 4 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)