Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Actos Lawsuit Results in Landmark $9 Billion Punitive Damages Verdict April 8, 2014 Austin Kirk Add Your Comments Following more than 12 weeks of trial, it took a Louisiana jury only a few hours to return a verdict in the first federal case involving the development of bladder cancer from side effects of Actos, awarding $1.5 million in compensatory damages and an additional $9 billion in punitive damages against Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly. The landmark jury award, which may be the largest ever in a pharmaceutical product liability lawsuit, came in a case brought by Terrance Allen, who alleged that the makers of the diabetes drug Actos withheld information from consumers and the medical community about the risk of users developing bladder cancer. The Actos trial was the first “bellwether” case in the federal court system, where about 3,000 other complaints are pending involving nearly identical allegations. Learn More About Actos Lawsuit Side effects of Actos may increase the risk of bladder cancer. Lawsuits are pending nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Actos Lawsuit Side effects of Actos may increase the risk of bladder cancer. Lawsuits are pending nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Following closing arguments presented on Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, the jury awarded $1.5 million in compensatory damages, which are designed to compensate Allen for his injuries. The jury also awarded additional damages designed to punish the drug makers for their actions, indicating that Takeda Pharmaceuticals should pay $6 billion in punitive damages and another $3 billion should be paid by Eli Lilly, which helped distribute the drug in the United States for several years. Before the case began, U.S. District Judge Rebecca Doherty, who is presiding over all federal Actos bladder cancer lawsuits, found that Takeda acted in bad faith during pretrial discovery, either accidentally or intentionally destroying evidence relevant to the cases. As a result, Judge Doherty allowed evidence to be presented to the jury regarding the spoiliation of evidence. Testimony and evidence was presented during the trial that suggested that Takeda Pharmaceuticals actively tried to hide the drug’s links to bladder cancer and successfully did so for several years. The trial included internal memos and communications, as well as scientific studies that Allen’s attorneys argued the drug maker tried to keep the public unaware. Takeda has maintained that Allen’s bladder cancer was not caused by Actos and that the company did due dillegence in providing bladder cancer warnings. However, the jury found that the popular diabetes drug was the cause of Allen’s bladder cancer diagnosis and awarded the seventh largest punitive damages verdict in U.S. history. The drug maker has indicated that it will appeal the decision, and it is likely that the verdict will be substantially reduced. Following the award, Takeda’s stock dropped more than eight percent. While some analysts say investors are overreacting, the drug maker’s overall cost to settle Actos lawsuits is likely to be substantial, since they will face a risk of punitive damages in other cases. Actos Litigation Actos (pioglitazone) is a type 2 diabetes drug that has been used by millions of Americans. Concerns emerged in 2010 about a potential link between Actos and bladder cancer, leading to thousands of product liability lawsuits being filed against the drug makers for failure to adequately research the medication or provide sufficient warnings to consumers and the medical commuity. In addition to cases pending before Judge Doherty in the federal Actos MDL (Multidistrict Litigation), a large number of cases have been filed in various state courts throughout the country. At least three trials have already taken place at the state level, with conflicting results. In May 2013, a California jury awarded $6.5 million in damages over Actos bladder cancer in a case brought by Jack Cooper, who was given an expedited trial date due to his grave health. However, following post-trial motions, that verdict was reversed after the state court judge excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witness testimony. A second trial was held in Maryland state court in September 2013, which resulted in a jury finding that Takeda failed to adequately warn about the risk of bladder cancer from Actos and awarding $1.77 million in damages. However, the case resulted in a defense verdict for the drug maker under a unique Maryland law, known as contributory negligence, as the jury also found that the plaintiff failed to exercise reasonable care for his own health, which nullified the negligence of the drug maker. A third Actos bladder cancer trial recently concluded in Nevada state court, which resulted in a defense verdict after the jury determined that both Actos and the plaintiff’s history as a smoker contributed to the development of bladder cancer. In that case, the plaintiff also ordered generic versions of Actos from online pharmacies, which raised questions as to whether Actos or unknown factors in the generic versions purchased online could have contributed to the development of the disease in that case. Another state case is currently underway in Las Vegas. The case involves claims by two different plaintiffs who say they developed bladder cancer as a result of taking the drug. Tags: Actos, Actos Bladder Cancer, Bladder Cancer, Cancer, Diabetes, Diabetes Drug, Eli Lilly, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Image Credit: | More Actos Lawsuit Stories Actos Bladder Cancer Warnings Updated by FDA to Add New Study Data Reviewed December 13, 2016 Bladder Cancer Risk with Actos Highlighted in a New Study April 5, 2016 Actos Side Effects May Increase Risk of Bone Fractures, Weight Gain: Study March 1, 2016 2 Comments Jim June 10, 2014 I just heard from my law firm. Be patient, this issue is very slow moving. Just be assured, your case will get it’s day in court. Takeda and Eli Lilly have very deep pockets, therefore expect every stalling and delaying tactic in the lawyers arsenal. Plus there are 3,000 or more individual suits to be adjudicated. And they are working in various Federal District courts throughout the nation. Also most law firms will allow you to contact them to inquire about the progress of your individual case. So you may contact them directly. Good luck in your pursuits. dominic April 20, 2014 I am a perfect example of Actos, and what it did to me. What do I have to do to hear from the lawfirm representing me, in this suit. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (Posted: today) Canadian researchers say receiving Depo-Provera injections for more than a year triples the risk of brain tumors compared to women who take birth control pills. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (07/09/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025) Uber Faces Lawsuit Indicating Driver Raped Passenger After Using Wife’s Account (Posted: yesterday) A lawsuit filed by a Florida woman says she was raped after an Uber driver’s husband showed up behind the wheel. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Driver Background Check Materials Must Be Produced in Sexual Assault Lawsuits: Court (06/17/2025)MDL Judge Updated on Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Status as Claims Top 2,800 (06/06/2025)Uber Seeks To Transfer MDL Sexual Assault Lawsuits to Districts Where Attacks Occurred for Trial (05/23/2025) Depo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (Posted: 2 days ago) A U.S. District Judge has ordered women involved in Depo-Provera lawsuits to inform him of any third-party pre-settlement loans they take out, as predatory interest rates may force them to reject settlement offers. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (07/11/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)
Depo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (Posted: today) Canadian researchers say receiving Depo-Provera injections for more than a year triples the risk of brain tumors compared to women who take birth control pills. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (07/09/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)
Uber Faces Lawsuit Indicating Driver Raped Passenger After Using Wife’s Account (Posted: yesterday) A lawsuit filed by a Florida woman says she was raped after an Uber driver’s husband showed up behind the wheel. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Driver Background Check Materials Must Be Produced in Sexual Assault Lawsuits: Court (06/17/2025)MDL Judge Updated on Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Status as Claims Top 2,800 (06/06/2025)Uber Seeks To Transfer MDL Sexual Assault Lawsuits to Districts Where Attacks Occurred for Trial (05/23/2025)
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (Posted: 2 days ago) A U.S. District Judge has ordered women involved in Depo-Provera lawsuits to inform him of any third-party pre-settlement loans they take out, as predatory interest rates may force them to reject settlement offers. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (07/11/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)