Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Actos Statute of Limitations May Run This Week in Some States June 13, 2012 Austin Kirk Add Your Comments It is possible that individuals diagnosed with bladder cancer after using Actos may face a deadline for filing their lawsuit later this week, if the medication was prescribed or used in a state with a one-year statute of limitations. Attorneys for Takeda Pharmaceuticals are expected to argue that the Actos statute of limitations started running in many cases on June 15, 2011, when the FDA issued a warning about the possible link between Actos and bladder cancer. Although no court has suggested that such arguments are likely to be successful, many lawyers are planning to make sure all cases are filed on behalf of individuals who may be subject to a one-year statute of limitations, which would require that they file a complaint within one year from the date they knew or reasonably should have known that their diagnosis of bladder cancer may have been caused by use of Actos. Learn More About Actos Lawsuit Side effects of Actos may increase the risk of bladder cancer. Lawsuits are pending nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Actos Lawsuit Side effects of Actos may increase the risk of bladder cancer. Lawsuits are pending nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The exact calculation of the statute of limitations period in each legal claim varies based on the laws of that state and the circumstances surrounding the case. While most states have a statute of limitations period that requires individuals to file their claim within two or three years, several states have only a one year limits period. Actos (pioglitazone) was developed by Takeda Pharmaceuticals and approved in the United States for treatment of type 2 diabetes in July 1999. The FDA began reviewing the potential risk of bladder cancer from Actos side effects in September 2010, after interim data from an on-going 10 year study found an increased incidence of tumors among users of the medication. Data suggested that the rate of exposure and increased risk of bladder cancer reached statistical significance after 24 months of use. In June 2011, information about the risk of bladder cancer from Actos was widely reported in the media when regulators in France issued an Actos recall after a review of public insurance data identified an increased incidence of cancer among users of the medication. On June 15, the FDA issued a drug safety communication that indicated new information would be added to the warning label for Actos, which states that use of the medication for more than one year may increase the risk of developing bladder cancer. Takeda Pharmaceuticals may argue that this notification would reasonably be expected to cause individuals to know that their may be a connection between their use of Actos and bladder cancer diagnosis. Hundreds of individuals throughout the United States have already filed an Actos lawsuit against Takeda Pharmaceuticals, alleging that the drug maker failed to properly research the medication or warn about the risk of developing bladder cancer. All federal cases involving bladder cancer with Actos use have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation, which is centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. In recent weeks, the number of Actos cases filed in the MDL has increased dramatically. However, most of the filings are not related to the possible approaching statute of limitations for Actos cases, but rather due to new procedures recently put in place by the Court, which allow for direct filing of lawsuits in the MDL. An evaluation of the applicable statute of limitations for each Actos lawsuit is made on a case-by-case basis by attorneys investigating potential cases. Although sound arguments may exist against Takeda’s likely position, many attorneys are treating June 15 as a possible deadline for filing cases from one-year discovery states. Tags: Actos, Actos Cancer, Bladder Cancer, Diabetes, Diabetes Drug, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Image Credit: | More Actos Lawsuit Stories Actos Bladder Cancer Warnings Updated by FDA to Add New Study Data Reviewed December 13, 2016 Bladder Cancer Risk with Actos Highlighted in a New Study April 5, 2016 Actos Side Effects May Increase Risk of Bone Fractures, Weight Gain: Study March 1, 2016 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES BioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (Posted: today) Following a Class I recall, more than 100 BioZorb lawsuits have been filed by breast cancer survivors who suffered painful complications after the surgical tissue marker failed to dissolve as intended. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025) Whippet Lawsuit Alleges Nitrous Oxide Addiction Resulted in Paralysis, Nerve Damage (Posted: 3 days ago) A class action lawsuit claims nitrous oxide canisters sold under names like GreatWhip and Galaxy Gas were illegally marketed for recreational use, leading to widespread addiction, nerve damage and paralysis among young users. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITGalaxy Gas Class Action Lawsuit Over Deceptive Marketing of Nitrous Oxide Amended (06/16/2025)FDA Updates List of Nitrous Oxide Inhalant Products That Pose Serious Health Risks (06/06/2025)Nitrous Oxide Addiction Lawsuit Claims Manufacturer Concealed Galaxy Gas Side Effects (05/01/2025) Cartiva Settlement Rumors Mount Again, as More Toe Implant Lawsuits Withdrawn and Trials Approach (Posted: 4 days ago) The withdrawal of two Cartiva toe implant lawsuits has sparked rumors of a potential settlement agreement to resolve product liability claims over the recalled devices. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITFailed Cartiva Implant Resulted in Need for Removal, Big Toe Fusion Surgery: Lawsuit (04/10/2025)Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (03/31/2025)Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)
BioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (Posted: today) Following a Class I recall, more than 100 BioZorb lawsuits have been filed by breast cancer survivors who suffered painful complications after the surgical tissue marker failed to dissolve as intended. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)
Whippet Lawsuit Alleges Nitrous Oxide Addiction Resulted in Paralysis, Nerve Damage (Posted: 3 days ago) A class action lawsuit claims nitrous oxide canisters sold under names like GreatWhip and Galaxy Gas were illegally marketed for recreational use, leading to widespread addiction, nerve damage and paralysis among young users. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITGalaxy Gas Class Action Lawsuit Over Deceptive Marketing of Nitrous Oxide Amended (06/16/2025)FDA Updates List of Nitrous Oxide Inhalant Products That Pose Serious Health Risks (06/06/2025)Nitrous Oxide Addiction Lawsuit Claims Manufacturer Concealed Galaxy Gas Side Effects (05/01/2025)
Cartiva Settlement Rumors Mount Again, as More Toe Implant Lawsuits Withdrawn and Trials Approach (Posted: 4 days ago) The withdrawal of two Cartiva toe implant lawsuits has sparked rumors of a potential settlement agreement to resolve product liability claims over the recalled devices. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITFailed Cartiva Implant Resulted in Need for Removal, Big Toe Fusion Surgery: Lawsuit (04/10/2025)Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (03/31/2025)Cartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)