Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Navy Engineer Diagnosed With Kidney Cancer From Fire Foam Exposure on Aircraft Carrier, Lawsuit Alleges February 18, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsFollowing years of exposure to fire foam chemicals working on an aircraft carrier and submarine, a former U.S. Navy engineer indicates he has been diagnosed with kidney cancer.Eugene Jackson, of Florida, filed a product liability complaint (PDF) this month against the manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) and toxic chemicals known as per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), alleging that the companies acted with reckless indifference to the health and safety of individuals exposed to their products.Firefighting foam containing PFAS chemicals was regularly used throughout Jacksonโs service in the Navy, beginning in 1980, when he trained at the Naval Training Center, then from 1981-1995 when he served as an engineer aboard the U.S.S. Lexington aircraft carrier and the U.S.S. Emory Land submarine tender.Firefighting Foam LawsuitsWere you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONFirefighting Foam LawsuitsWere you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONJackson indicates he developed kidney cancer as a result of the fire foam exposure, which was confirmed in February 2017, through robotic nephrectomy of his right kidney.According to allegations raised in the lawsuit, the defendants involved in production or sale of fluorochemical fire foam products knew about the risks, and never should have marketed AFFF.โAt all times pertinent to this Complaint, Defendants regularly participated in placing the fluorochemical products into the American stream of commerce,โ the lawsuit states. โAs manufacturers, designers, refiners, formulators, distributors, suppliers, sellers, and/or marketers of fluorochemical products, Defendants owed a duty to all persons whom Defendantsโ products might foreseeably harm, including Plaintiff, not to manufacture, sell, and/or market any product which is unreasonably dangerous for its intended and foreseeable uses.โThe toxic chemicals were first introduced into the manufacturing industry in the 1940โs, because of their ability to resist heat, grease, stains, and water. However, since then the chemicals have been linked to a myriad of adverse health effects including liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased fertility, high cholesterol, obesity, hormone suppression, and cancer.Jacksonโs complaint joins a number of fire foam lawsuitsย filed across the nation, all raising similar allegations of the manufacturers failing to warn of the dangerous PFAS, which have resulted in those exposed to develop testicular cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer and other injuries.Due to the growing number ofย lawsuits over firefighting foam injuriesย brought throughout the federal court system, centralized pretrial proceedings have been established in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, where the parties are engaging in coordinated discovery and preparing for a series of early โbellwetherโ trials designed to gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated in claims brought by firefighters nationwide. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Firefighter, Firefighter Foam, Kidney Cancer, PFAS Find Out If You Qualify for A AFFF Lawsuit SettlementMore Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Stories Judges to Weigh Firefighter Gear Lawsuit Consolidation This Month July 24, 2026 Firefighter Turnout Gear Lawsuits Warrant New MDL Over PFAS Risks: Motion May 18, 2026 Three AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuits Selected for Tier 2 Bellwether Trials September 16, 2025 3 Comments James December 2, 2022 I am a retired naval engineer and served as Boiler Technician and Machinist Mate from 1978 – 2000. I now suffer from stage 4 Renal Cell Carcinoma. I was exposed to along with many other cancer causing chemicals, including the AFFF many times while serving onboard US ships. I was diagnosed with RCC in 2016. Had my right kidney removed and within a year, the cancer had metastasized to my lungs, ribs and spine. I recall several times being drenched in AFFF when conducting MSF drills. Many times we used AFFF mixed with “big juice” to clean bilges, deck plates and wash our uniforms and under clothing. I even remember being told to ingest the foam while in boot camp as the foam was made from animal bone and would not harm us. Most all in my presence there try it, including myself. I would like to hear from others with RCC that were exposed to this chemical. Thank you and God Bless. Irvin Jackson March 17, 2022 [Editor]: fixed! Daryl March 17, 2022 USS Emory S. Land is a submarine tender, not a โsubmarineโ as stated in the article. CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (Posted: yesterday)C.R. Bard and its Becton Dickinson parent company face more than 3,700 Bard PowerPort lawsuits that claim the port catheters are defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026) Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 2 days ago)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026) Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)
Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (Posted: yesterday)C.R. Bard and its Becton Dickinson parent company face more than 3,700 Bard PowerPort lawsuits that claim the port catheters are defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026)
Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 2 days ago)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)
Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 3 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)