Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Backhoe Struck In Amtrak Accident Was Scheduled To Be There, NTSB Reports April 21, 2016 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsTwo railroad workers were killed earlier this month when their backhoe was struck by an Amtrak train in Pennsylvania, and a preliminary report suggests that they were scheduled to be on the tracks at the time, raising questions about how that information was or was not communicated to the operator of the passenger train.ย According to an investigation update issued by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on April 18, the maintenance crew performing work on the track were within a scheduled 55-hour window when Amtrak train 89 struck the backhoe while traveling at nearly 106 mph, killing two workers.The investigation is still ongoing to determine why the train was scheduled to pass through the designated area where maintenance was previously planned.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONOn Sunday, April 3, 2016, at approximately 7:50 a.m., Amtrak train 89, carrying 337 passengers and seven crew members, struck the backhoe at mile post 15.7 on the Amtrak Northeast Corridor near Chester, Pennsylvania, killing backhoe operator, Joe Carter, and a supervisor, Peter Adamovich, both veteran Amtrak workers, and sending 41 Amtrak passengers to nearby hospitals.The train consisted of one locomotive, eight passenger cars, one cafรฉ car, and one baggage car. Reports suggest that it was traveling on track 3 at roughly 106 mph in a 110 mph speed limit zone at the time of the accident.Investigators indicate the maintenance crew was performing ballast cleaning and a remediation of a fouled ballast on track two during a scheduled 55-hour window beginning on April 1, 2016 at 10:00 p.m. and extending to 5:00 a.m. on April 4, 2016.The NTSB states that during the scheduled maintenance track 2 was removed from service and intermittent foul time was granted on main tracks 1, 3 and 4 to protect the crew members. The backhoe that was used to assist in cutting away the fouled ballast.During scheduled maintenance times, the NTSB establishes what are known as โfoul timesโ to ensure workers are not on the tracks at the same time a train is scheduled to use that track. The roadway worker is supposed to be notified by the train dispatcher that no trains will operate within a specific stretch of track until the maintenance crew members report the track is clear.At this time, the NTSB has not confirmed whether the foul time protocols were set in place, or whether the Amtrak train had permission to use the track at the time of the incident. Some experts have speculated that proper foul time protocols could not have been set in place, indicating it would have been impossible to route the train on the parallel track because it would have recognized the scheduling conflict. The NTSB has not yet stated whether failed protocols or failure to get permission to use the track was the cause of the accident.Statements gathered from the Amtrak trains engineer by the NTSB indicate the operator hit the brakes and initiated emergency protocols only after seeing something on the tracks ahead, leaving hardly any time to bring the train to a stop from its 106 mph traveling speed. The operator was not aware of any ongoing maintenance that would have potentially interfered with the route.The report is the first of many anticipated updates to follow over the next year to determine where the communication failure occurred and establish backup protocols to prevent further fatalities and injuries from happening. Amtrak also recently reported the estimated damages of the accident to reach $2.2. million, not including any potential liability costs from lawsuits if the accident is determined to be a result of negligence. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Amtrak, Train Accident, Train CrashMore Lawsuit Stories Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism July 7, 2026 Omnipod Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Recalled Insulin Delivery System July 7, 2026 Lack of Safety Features Led to Roblox Child Exploitation, Lawsuit Claims July 7, 2026 0 Comments PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: today)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026) Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration (Posted: yesterday)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (06/16/2026) Olympus Scope Infection Concerns Follow Years of FDA Warnings Over Reusable Endoscopes (Posted: 5 days ago)Federal warnings and enforcement actions involving Olympus and other reusable medical scopes have raised concerns that design flaws may allow bacteria to remain trapped after cleaning, leading to serious infections and product liability lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SCOPE INFECTION LAWSUITOlympus Endoscope Lawsuit Filed Over ERCP Infection, Sepsis Linked to Contaminated Scope (06/09/2026)Pediatric Sepsis Cases Contribute to More Than 1,800 Childrenโs Deaths Annually in U.S.: Study (03/31/2026)Infections After Colonoscopy, ERCP May Result in Lawsuits Over Olympus Scope Problems (03/27/2026)
Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism July 7, 2026
Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: today)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026)
Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration (Posted: yesterday)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (06/16/2026)
Olympus Scope Infection Concerns Follow Years of FDA Warnings Over Reusable Endoscopes (Posted: 5 days ago)Federal warnings and enforcement actions involving Olympus and other reusable medical scopes have raised concerns that design flaws may allow bacteria to remain trapped after cleaning, leading to serious infections and product liability lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SCOPE INFECTION LAWSUITOlympus Endoscope Lawsuit Filed Over ERCP Infection, Sepsis Linked to Contaminated Scope (06/09/2026)Pediatric Sepsis Cases Contribute to More Than 1,800 Childrenโs Deaths Annually in U.S.: Study (03/31/2026)Infections After Colonoscopy, ERCP May Result in Lawsuits Over Olympus Scope Problems (03/27/2026)