Amtrak Supports MDL for Philadelphia Train Crash Lawsuits

According to a recent response filed with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), Amtrak agrees that all personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits filed over the Northeast Regional train derailment near Philadelphia in May should be centralized before one judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.  

Last month, a group of plaintiffs filed a motion to establish an Amtrak lawsuit MDL, or multidistrict litigation, to reduce duplicative discovery into common issues in the cases, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and the courts.

In a response (PDF) filed on June 30, Amtrak indicates that it agrees the cases should be centralized before U.S. District Judge Legrome Davis in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where most of the current complaints are already pending.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

There are already at least 22 Amtrak train accident lawsuits filed in four separate U.S. District Courts, with additional claims expected on behalf of the 238 passengers injured in the crash.

“An MDL proceeding will promote coordinated discovery, reduce the costs of litigation, and enable cases to proceed more efficiently to resolution or trial,” Amtrak noted in the response.

All of the complaints involves similar allegations that Amtrak’s negligence caused the derailment of Northeast Regional Train 188 on May 12, after it went around a dangerous curve in the tracks at more than 100 miles per hour. The train was traveling from Washington, D.C. to New York, resulting in eight deaths and varying degrees of injuries for almost all others onboard the train.

While the accident is still under investigation, a team from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has determined that the train headed toward the turn at 107 m.p.h. when the engineer, identified as Brandon Bostian, hit the emergency brakes. The train took the turn at 102 m.p.h.; more than double the 50 m.p.h. speed limit, according to data recorders on the train, analyzed by the NTSB team.

In addition, that section of the tracks did not have a positive control system used across the region to automatically slow trains down when travelling at excessive speed. Congress has mandated that all railroads in the U.S. have such a system in place by the end of this year.

Some critics say the accident could have been avoided if a second engineer had been present on the train, which would have reduced the risk that the operator would have maintained the excessive speed heading into the dangerous part of the train tracks.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

A U.S. District Judge has ordered women involved in Depo-Provera lawsuits to inform him of any third-party pre-settlement loans they take out, as predatory interest rates may force them to reject settlement offers.