Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Fatal Bleeding Still Occurring With New Blood Thinners Despite Antidotes: Study June 21, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsImportant Andexxa Update โ December 22, 2025: An Andexxa recall was announced on December 18, 2025, and the drug was subsequently removed from the U.S. market after regulators concluded it failed to effectively reverse life-threatening bleeding while increasing the risk of heart attack, stroke, dangerous blood clots and related deaths. Following the recall, Andexxa lawsuits are now being investigated to determine whether the drug should never have been introduced or kept on the market.The findings of a new study reveal many bleeding events among users of a new generation of blood thinners, such Pradaxa, Xarelto and Eliquis, still end in death, despite the introduction of โreversal agentsโ intended to stop their blood thinning effects. Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) cause major bleeding in 2% to 3.5% of all patients, according to new data from Spanish researchers. When the drugs were first introduced several years ago, however, there were no medications specifically designed to halt their blood thinning effects, often leaving doctors with no way to prevent patients from bleeding out.In 2017 and 2018, that changed, first with a reversal agent for Pradaxa, and then with a reversal agent for Xarelto, Eliquis and other Factor Xa inhibitors. However, according to the new study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology on June 14, the risk of death from bleeding events still remains high, even for patients given the reversal agents.andexxa Recall lawsuitDid you or a loved one RECEIVE andexxa?Lawsuits are being investigated after findings showed Andexxa failed to effectively reverse bleeding events while increasing the risk of serious injuries, including stroke, heart attack, dangerous blood clots, and death.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONandexxa Recall lawsuitDid you or a loved one RECEIVE andexxa?Lawsuits are being investigated after findings showed Andexxa failed to effectively reverse bleeding events while increasing the risk of serious injuries, including stroke, heart attack, dangerous blood clots, and death.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONResearchers looked at data from 60 studies, involving 4,735 patients who suffered severe bleeding related to the use of Pradaxa, Xarelto, Eliquis and other DOACs. They were given either the reversal agent for Pradaxa or the reversal agent for Xarelto and Eliquis. However, the mortality rate was still high, at just under 18%, and was more than 20% for those who suffered intracranial bleeding, or brain bleeds. The rebleeding rate was 13.2%, with 78% of those rebleeds occurring after the patients were put back on the blood thinners.Researchers also found a high rate of thromboembolism, potentially fatal blood clots, were associated with AndexXa; the reversal agent for Xarelto and Eliquis.At issue was the rate of effective hemostasis, the ability for the reversal agents to cancel out the blood thinning effects, which was only 78.5%. The rate was similar regardless of which reversal agent was used, and researchers found that patient risk of death was โmarkedly and significantlyโ tied to whether the patients achieved effective hemostasis.โThe risk of death after severe DOAC-related bleeding remains significant despite a high rate of effective hemostasis with reversal agents,โ the researchers determined. โFailure to achieve effective hemostasis strongly correlated with a fatal outcome.โIncidents of unstoppable bleeding have resulted in thousands of reports involving injury or death for patients using the new drugs. About 30,000 Xarelto lawsuits were filed against the drug makers, alleging that users and the medical community were not adequately warned about the risk of problems linked to the drug.Following a handful of early bellwether trials, which were held before U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon in the Eastern District of Louisiana to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that was likely to be repeated throughout the litigation, a global Xarelto settlement was reached in March 2019, resolving nearly all claims. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Bleeding, Blood Thinners, Brain Hemorrhage, Eliquis, Pradaxa, XareltoMore Andexxa Lawsuit Stories Lawsuit Alleges Andexxa Administered To Reverse Xarelto Effects Caused Near-Fatal Thrombotic Event May 28, 2026 Eliquis, Xarelto Bleeding Risks Renewed Amid Andexxa Recall Tied to Stroke, Heart Attack Concerns January 9, 2026 Andexxa Recall Announced After FDA Says Xarelto, Eliquis Reversal Agent Risks Outweigh Benefits December 22, 2025 0 CommentsURLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: 2 days ago)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026) Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: 3 days ago)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026) J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Andexxa Administered To Reverse Xarelto Effects Caused Near-Fatal Thrombotic Event May 28, 2026
Eliquis, Xarelto Bleeding Risks Renewed Amid Andexxa Recall Tied to Stroke, Heart Attack Concerns January 9, 2026
Andexxa Recall Announced After FDA Says Xarelto, Eliquis Reversal Agent Risks Outweigh Benefits December 22, 2025
Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: 2 days ago)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)
Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: 3 days ago)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)