Skip Navigation

Eligible for a AngioDynamics Port Catheter lawsuit?

Angiodynamics-Port-Catheter-Lawsuit

Angiodynamics-Port-Catheter-Lawsuit

AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit

Updates and Settlement Information

What is the AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit?

AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits are being pursued by lawyers throughout the U.S., alleging that design defects make the manufacturer’s implantable port catheter systems prone to fracturing, migrating and causing serious health risks.

Individuals may be eligible for a AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit settlement if they received an implantable port and experienced;

  • Catheter Fracture
  • Perforations
  • Catheter Migration
  • Infection
  • Blood Clots
  • Wrongful Death
  • Other Injuries

UPDATED:


AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Overview

The AngioDynamics implantable port devices are designed to provide long-term vascular access for patients who require regular intravenous treatments, such as chemotherapy, antibiotics, parenteral nutrition, or blood transfusions. These ports are surgically implanted under the skin, with a catheter that runs into a large vein, allowing healthcare providers to deliver medications and fluids directly into the bloodstream.

However, since these devices were introduced in 2003, a growing number of patients have reported serious complications linked to AngioDynamics port catheters, including cases where the catheter has fractured, broken apart, or migrated from its original position. These failures have led to life-threatening infections, blood clots, cardiac injuries, and other severe complications or death.

As a result, AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits are being filed against the manufacturers, alleging that their port catheter devices have a defective design that compromises patient safety. Lawsuits claim that the catheter material, made from polyurethane mixed with barium sulfate, weakens over time, making the ports prone to cracking, breaking and harboring dangerous bacteria.

Additionally, lawsuits argue that AngioDynamics failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about the known risks of catheter fracture, migration, and infection, leaving patients vulnerable to devastating injuries.

Financial compensation may be available through a AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit settlement for individuals who received one or more of the manufacturers implantable ports, and subsequently suffered any of the following complications:

  • Infections (sepsis or septic shock)
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
  • Hemorrhaging or Bleeding Injuries
  • Cardiac/pericardial tamponade
  • Cardiac arrhythmia
  • Severe and persistent pain
  • Perforations of tissues, vessels and organs
  • Patient death
  • Other injuries caused by a AngioDynamics port catheter

To determine if you or a loved one qualify for an AngioDynamics port catheter settlement, submit information for review by a port catheter injury lawyer, who will evaluate the circumstances of your case and determine if you qualify for a claim.

Attorneys handle all AngioDynamics lawsuits on a contingency fee basis, which means that there are no fees or expenses paid unless a settlement or lawsuit payout is received.

AngioDynamics-Port-Catheter-Lawsuits
AngioDynamics-Port-Catheter-Lawsuits

2025 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Updates

April 4, 2025 Update: In one of the most recent AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed, a Missouri woman alleges that the company’s SmartPort port catheter, which was implanted in her in March 2013, has a defective design that led to the device shattering inside her body. The lawsuit details how the SmartPort catheter fractured in March 2020 and was subsequently found to have failed, necessitating its surgical removal just days later. Despite the initial surgery, a fragment of the catheter remained, requiring an additional procedure in April 2020 to remove it.

March 5, 2025 Update: The JPML has reported in its latest docket report that there are at least 120 Angiodynamics chemo port lawsuits currently pending in the litigation.

February 25, Update: As the size of the litigation continues to grow, AngioDynamics filed a notice on February 20, indicating that it plans to file a motion to dismiss at least 58 of the 125 pending claims, arguing that nearly half of the chemo port lawsuits were filed after statute of limitation laws in the plaintiffs’ states had passed, indicating some plaintiffs waited 10 to 22 years to file a complaint about their injuries.

January 31, 2025 Update: With at least 90 product liability lawsuits brought through federal courts so far against the medical device companies, Judge Ohta authorized the direct filing of new AngioDynamics lawsuits in the MDL, indicating it would eliminate delays linked to having to transfer cases from other federal courts. Judge Ohta’s order indicates that defendants have no plans to object to filings into her court.

October 4, 2024 Update: The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued a transfer order on October 3, centralizing all current and future AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits in the Southern District of California, appointing U.S. District Judge Jinsook Ohta to oversee the pretrial proceedings of the AngioDynamics, Inc., and Navilyst Medical, Inc., Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation . At the time of the motion, there were 23 lawsuits pending across 16 different district courts, with the JPML noting an additional 33 potential actions in 19 districts, indicating a rapidly expanding scope of litigation.

September 27, 2024 Update: The U.S. JPML heard oral arguments over the motion during a recent hearing on September 26, at the Fred D. Thompson U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building in Nashville, Tennessee, to determine whether cases over the defective port catheter devices should be consolidated, and if so, where.

August 8, 2024 Update: Following a growing number of AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits being filed, each raising similar allegations that the manufacturer failed to disclose the risks associated with the devices, plaintiffs have filed a motion to centralize all AngioDynamics lawsuits filed in federal court before one judge in a multidistrict litigation.


Angiodynamics Port Catheter MDL No. 3125

Due to similar questions of fact and law raised in a growing number of lawsuits filed against AngioDynamics, a motion was filed in July 2024 to consolidate the cases into a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL). Plaintiffs requested centralization of AngioDynamics lawsuits to avoid duplicative discovery, prevent conflicting pretrial rulings, and improve judicial efficiency in handling these complex claims.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) heard oral arguments on September 26, 2024, during a hearing held at the Fred D. Thompson U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building in Nashville, Tennessee, to determine whether the cases should be coordinated and where they should be assigned.

On October 3, 2024, the JPML issued a transfer order, establishing the AngioDynamics, Inc., and Navilyst Medical, Inc., Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, directing that all current and future AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide be centralized in the Southern District of California, under the supervision of U.S. District Judge Jinsook Ohta for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

At the time of the motion, there were at least 23 port catheter lawsuits pending in 16 different district courts, and the JPML noted an additional 33 potential actions in 19 districts, signaling that the litigation is rapidly growing in size and scope.

However, the litigation has grown significantly in size since the centralization, as individuals who have suffered AngioDynamics port catheter injuries have come forward to file claims.

  • SmartPort Port Catheter
  • LifePort Port Catheter
  • Xcela Plus Port Catheter
  • Vortex Port Catheter​
  • Navilyst PowerPort
  • BioFlo Port Catheter

No, there is not a class action lawsuit over AngioDynamics port catheters. Instead, individuals who have suffered injuries are filing separate lawsuits in either state or federal court to recover damages from the injuries they have sustained.


What Are AngioDynamics Port Catheters Used For?

AngioDynamics port catheters are vascular access devices implanted under the skin, typically in the chest. They are designed to allow repeated access to a patient’s vascular system for treatments like:

  • Chemotherapy
  • IV medications
  • Blood transfusions
  • Nutrition (TPN)

The catheter connects to a port that healthcare providers can access with a needle, eliminating the need for multiple IV lines. These devices are supposed to stay safely implanted for months or years.


Angiodynamics Port Catheter Design Defects

Lawsuits claim that AngioDynamics failed to properly design and manufacture its port catheter systems and failed to provide adequate warnings to patients and doctors about known risks and life threatening complications. Some of the specific design defect allegations named in lawsuits include the following:

One of the common problems outlined in lawsuits is the composition of the catheter material. AngioDynamics port catheters are made from polyurethane mixed with barium sulfate, a radiopaque agent that allows doctors to see the catheter on X-rays.

However, lawsuits claim that excessive barium sulfate concentrations weaken the catheter’s structural integrity, causing the material to:

  • Crack and split over time.
  • Develop microfractures that grow and worsen with use.
  • Lose flexibility and become brittle inside the body.

These material failures can cause the catheter to fracture and break apart while implanted, placing patients at risk of fragments migrating into critical areas like the heart and lungs.

Another issue is surface degradation. The mixture of polyurethane and barium sulfate is alleged to create a rough and uneven surface, especially as barium sulfate particles break away from the catheter over time.

This surface roughness can cause several dangerous complications:

  • Buildup of fibrin and blood clots (thrombosis) on the catheter surface.
  • Increased risk of bacterial colonization, leading to serious infections and sepsis.
  • Damage to blood vessels from the irregular and deteriorating catheter wall.

Lawsuits argue that AngioDynamics failed to incorporate available safer design options, such as using higher-grade radiopaque materials or adding protective layers to prevent surface erosion.

In addition to material issues, lawsuits claim that AngioDynamics did not properly control the manufacturing process, resulting in:

  • Inconsistent mixing of barium sulfate within the catheter material, creating weak points prone to breaking.
  • Variable catheter wall thickness, making some areas thinner and more likely to fracture.
  • Failure to adjust the polymer formulation when receiving raw materials that did not meet required specifications.

AngioDynamics Port Catheter Injuries

Lawsuits filed against AngioDynamics allege that design and manufacturing defects make these devices prone to serious health complications and injuries. Numerous adverse event reports have been outlined in lawsuits, including:

  • Need for additional surgeries: Many patients require emergency procedures to remove fractured or infected devices.
  • Catheter device fractures: Pieces of the catheter may break off inside the body, with fragments traveling to the heart, lungs, or other organs.
  • Infections: Bacteria can enter the bloodstream due to cracks or surface damage, leading to sepsis and other severe infections.
  • Blood clots (thrombosis): The presence of damaged or fractured catheters can cause clot formation, putting patients at risk of stroke, embolism, or heart attack.
  • Device migration: The port or catheter can shift from its original position, causing damage to veins and surrounding tissues.

Share Your Story

Were you injured by a defective AngioDynamics port catheter? Share your story with AboutLawsuits.com and have your comments reviewed by a lawyer to determine if you may be eligible for a lawsuit.

AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Settlements

The AngioDynamics port catheter litigation is still in the early stages, and no global settlement offers have been made by the manufacturer at this time. While dozens of lawsuits have already been filed and consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), the process of gathering evidence, reviewing documents, and preparing cases for a series on bellwether trials is still ongoing as new cases are filed monthly.

It is expected that U.S. District Judge Jinsook Ohta, who is overseeing the coordinated pretrial proceedings in the Southern District of California, will soon establish a bellwether trial program. This means a small group of representative cases will be selected for early jury trials to help determine how juries may respond to evidence and testimony about catheter fractures, infections, blood clots, and other complications.

These bellwether trials are crucial in shaping the outcome of the litigation, as they provide insight into how juries will respond to evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout each of the claims.

Although it is too early to know how much compensation may be awarded, these early trials will help determine the potential value of future settlements or verdicts in similar claims.

Since no settlements have been reached yet, the value of an AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit will depend on the severity of each person’s injuries and how the device failure impacted their life. However, based on similar cases involving defective medical devices, the following types of damages may be available:

  • Medical Expenses: Compensation for past and future medical bills related to treating infections, blood clots, catheter removal surgeries, hospital stays, and follow-up care caused by the defective port catheter.
  • Pain and Suffering: Money to cover the physical pain and emotional distress endured because of the catheter failure, including ongoing complications and the trauma of invasive procedures.
  • Lost Wages: Reimbursement for income lost due to time away from work during treatment, recovery, or hospitalizations, as well as any loss of future earning capacity if the injuries prevent a return to work.
  • Permanent Disability or Disfigurement: Compensation if the catheter complications caused lasting physical damage, scarring from surgeries, or loss of normal bodily function.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Money to account for the negative impact on quality of life, such as no longer being able to engage in activities or care for oneself due to ongoing health issues.
  • Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish: Recovery for the emotional suffering caused by the ordeal, including anxiety, depression, and fear about future health.
  • Out-of-Pocket Costs: Reimbursement for travel, home care, medications, and other expenses directly related to the injury caused by the defective port catheter.
  • Wrongful Death Damages: For surviving family members if a loved one died due to complications from an AngioDynamics port catheter. This can include funeral costs, loss of financial support, and compensation for the emotional pain of losing a loved one.

How Long Do I Have To File A Lawsuit For AngioDynamics Port Catheter Injuries?

The time limit to file an AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuit, known as the statute of limitations, varies by state and depends on the specific circumstances of your case. Generally, the deadline is based on when the injury occurred or when it was first discovered that the port catheter may have caused harm.

Since complications like catheter fractures, infections, or blood clots may not appear until months or even years after implantation, it’s important to speak with a lawyer as soon as possible to determine how much time you have to file. If you wait too long, you could lose the right to pursue compensation for your injuries.


Examples of AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits

McKenzie Jacobsen filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on December 6, 2024, alleging that a defect in the device’s design caused her to develop a Staphylococcus epidermidis infection that required surgical removal.

Jacobsen presents claims of negligence, design defect, failure to warn, breach of warranty, fraudulent concealment, violations of Minnesota’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and seeks compensatory damages.

Serena Coleman filed an Angiodynamics Xcela lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California on May 9, indicating that she required surgical removal of an AngioDynamics Xcela port after it failed and led to the development of a severe infection.

Coleman states that she received an AngioDynamics Xcela port catheter in May 2022, and by October, she developed central line site pain and a lump at the implant site, which was diagnosed as an infection. Later that month, the infected port had to be surgically removed. She blames the infection and other health complications on the port’s construction with barium sulfate particles. 

Laura Schultz filed an Angiodynamics LifePort lawsuit in the U.S. District Court Eastern District of California on September 9, after suffering injuries from a fractured and migrated port catheter while receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Schultz claims that in November 2009, she began experiencing an irregular heart rate and was admitted to Stanislaus Surgical Hospital in Modesto, California. Imaging revealed that her LifePort had thrombosed and fractured, causing fragments to migrate into her right atrium. Schultz subsequently underwent surgery to remove the damaged LifePort catheter system.

Jeremy Matchett filed an Angiodynamics Vortex lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on September 24, indicating that a portion of his chemo port broke while doctors were attempting to remove it, and portions remained in his body for months, unbeknownst to him or his doctors.

Matchett had his Vortex port removed in May 2023 following treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. However, in August 2023, he began experiencing chest pain and palpitations when lying on his left side, leading to the discovery of retained fragments. A CT scan revealed that a piece of the broken chemo port had migrated to his left brachiocephalic vein, a major vessel transporting blood from the upper body to the heart. This condition had gone unnoticed by healthcare providers until then, which required surgical intervention.

Youwith Pinnock filed a Vortex port infection lawsuit on behalf of the estate of Tiffany Gadson, on February 6, 2025, in the Southern District of California. According to the lawsuit, Gadson was implanted with an AngioDynamics Vortex port in April 2011. However, in October 2015, she was hospitalized for a sickle cell crisis when she tested positive for a Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus infection.

The lawsuit claims the infection stemmed from the Vortex port, leading to its surgical removal in 2018. The complaint raises allegations of fraudulent concealment, negligence, failure to warn, design defect, breach of warranty, violation of Virginia consumer protection laws, and seeks compensatory and punitive damages.


Have a Port Catheter Injury Lawyer Review Your Case

AngioDynamics port catheter lawyers provide free consultations and claim evaluations. There are no fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

If you or a loved one suffered severe injuries from an AngioDynamics device, submit information about your potential claim for review by a AngioDynamics lawyer to determine whether you qualify for a claim, and if you may be eligible to seek compensation for your injuries.

Free Case Evaluation

If you or a loved one experienced an injury from an AngioDynamics port catheter, submit information for review by a lawyer to determine if you may be eligible for an AngioDynamics lawsuit settlement.


0 Comments


Share Your Story With Our Community

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.