Avandia Provides No Significant Benefit in Reduction of Artery Plaque

According to new research presented yesterday at the American Heart Association’s annual meeting in New Orleans, Avandia does not provide any statistically significant reduction in the buildup of plaque in coronary arteries when compared to an older generic diabetes drug.

The findings could add further support to the growing movement calling for an Avandia recall, since many experts indicate that any potential benefits of the drug are outweighed by the risk, especially considering alternative medications that are available.

GlaxoSmithKline PLC’s Avandia (rosiglitazone) was approved by the FDA in 1999 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Sales for the drug were over $2 billion a year, until a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May 2007 suggested that users of the drug may face an increased risk of heart problems.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, filed a petition with the FDA on October 30, 2008, calling for an Avandia ban.

The group pointed to the previously identified side effects of Avandia which could increase the risk of heart attacks, congestive heart failure, macular edema and bone fractures. However, the group also identified a potential new health concern, pointing to 14 reports of liver failure involving Avandia received by the FDA, 12 of which resulted in death.

Last month, the American Diabetes Association and their European counterpart issued a revised consensus statement on type 2 diabetes treatments, indicating that Avandia should not be used.

The latest research reported on November 12, 2008, has several experts renewing their concerns about the continued use of the Avandia, since there are more effective and safer medications available.

The study involved data on 672 people in 19 countries, testing Avandia against Pfizer Inc.’s Glucotrol, which is also available as generic glipizide. The study was designed to measure plaque buildup in heart arteries, which was measured at the start of the study and 18 months later.

Researchers found that Avandia only provided a slight reduction in placque when compared with glipizide, and the difference was too small to be statistically significant, which means it could have been attributed to chance.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

Plaintiffs have asked the judge presiding over all AFFF lawsuits to consolidate five claims involving kidney cancer and testicular cancer injuries for the first bellwether trial in the federal MDL.
As sportsbooks have spread to 38 states, new data shows a sharp rise in gambling addiction-related help-seeking, suggesting that the platforms’ predatory designs may be fueling harmful, compulsive behaviors.
A product liability lawsuit over the side effects of the Depo shot states women worldwide were warned about brain tumor risks, but not those in the U.S.