Avastin Gastrointestinal Perforation Risk Confirmed by Study
New research confirms that cancer patients treated with Avastin face a greatly increased risk of developing potentially deadly holes in the wall of their stomach, small intestine or large bowel, known as gastrointestinal perforation.
According to the study, published in the most recent issue of the medical journal The Lancet Oncology, researchers at Stony Brook University Cancer Center in New York found that side effects of Avastin, the brand name of the anti-angiogenesis drug Bevacizumab, can lead to a 167 percent higher risk of developing gastrointestinal perforations when the drug is taken together with chemotherapy.
While Avastin already has a black-box warning about the risk, the research is the first to first to establish the significant Avastin gastrointestinal perforation risk.
Did You Know?
Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled
Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.Learn More
Avastin was approved by the FDA in 2004 for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer when combined with chemotherapy. The drug prevents the formation of new blood vessels in tumors, starving them and inhibiting their growth. It has been found to improve the survival rate of cancer patients when combined with chemotherapy.
Gastrointestinal perforations are holes in the walls of the stomach, small intestine or large bowel, which allow the contents to leak out into the abdominal cavity. This can cause bacterial contamination, a condition known as peritonitis. When the stomach develops perforations, gastric acid can leak into the abdominal cavity, causing chemical peritonitis. Such incidents are considered surgical emergencies that require immediate treatment.
The new study looked at 12,294 patients with a variety of solid tumors. Gastrointestinal perforation occurred in 0.9% of the patients being treated with Avastin, about twice the rate of those who did not take the drug. More than 20% of those cases were fatal.
The Avastin study also found a direct correlation with dosage and the types of tumors treated. When compared to those who did not take the drug, patients being treated with 2.5 mg/kg per week saw a 61% increase in the risk of gastrointestinal perforation from Avastin, compared with a 167% rate for those taking 5 mg/kg per week. Patients being treated for advanced colorectal cancer and renal cell cancer were found to also be at an especially increased risk, with patients treated for pancreatic cancer facing the lowest risk.
A prior study from Stony Brook in November 2008 indicated that Avastin can also increase the risk of blood clots by as much as one third, leading researchers to call for stronger warnings to be added to the drug’s label about the Avastin blood clot side effects.
In December 2008, the drug’s manufacturer, Genentech, sent a letter to doctors warning about Avastin problems linked to reports of serious eye inflammation when it is used off-labelm to treat wet macular degeneration. The manufacturer stated that it was aware of at least 38 cases of eye problems from Avastin use, with 32 of them involving severe inflammation.
GuidoOctober 30, 2009 at 10:26 am
Avastin would create a similar condition like GI perforation in breast too. My w. had been on Avastin & Xeloda combination for around a year; and her(3-4 years old) lumpectomy suture and the surgical bed started pulling in and opening up (on the inframamary fold). The opening has not been healed since the starting around April 2009. The breast gradually hardened. It seems she has to go thr[Show More]Avastin would create a similar condition like GI perforation in breast too. My w. had been on Avastin & Xeloda combination for around a year; and her(3-4 years old) lumpectomy suture and the surgical bed started pulling in and opening up (on the inframamary fold). The opening has not been healed since the starting around April 2009. The breast gradually hardened. It seems she has to go through an otherwise unnecessary mastectomy. Any help or sugession in regards are welcomed.
MaenMay 28, 2009 at 2:02 pm
I think the Avastin is a big bubble should be finished for example: 1. Colorectal Cancer: with Oxaliplatin was not impressive. Only with Irinotecan also a negative result in early cancer 2. Breast cancer with old product called Paclitaxel was given a good result (only progression free survival not overall survival) but in the other hand with the newest & most common drug Docetaxel with a tri[Show More]I think the Avastin is a big bubble should be finished for example: 1. Colorectal Cancer: with Oxaliplatin was not impressive. Only with Irinotecan also a negative result in early cancer 2. Breast cancer with old product called Paclitaxel was given a good result (only progression free survival not overall survival) but in the other hand with the newest & most common drug Docetaxel with a trial called Avado trial ; it seems the result was not so impressive they tried to promoted the Hazard ratio rather than a clinical result. The median time to disease progression was 8 months with docetaxel alone, compared with 8.7 months with docetaxel plus low-dose bevacizumab, and 8.8 months with docetaxel plus high-dose Bevacizumab it is 0.8 months = 24 days !!! 3. Lung cancer : at the beginning with Paclitaxel it was made a good survival a trial called E4599 by A Sandler published at 2006 at NEJM it is add 2 months for overall survival (from 10.2 to 12.2 ) with a double dose and of course a double cost 4. Renal cell carcinoma : same story; without any advantages regarding survival Kindly note the British health system was refused Avastin for CRC or other indications due to lack cost effectiveness Is it worth this!!!
"*" indicates required fields
More Top Stories
Defendants want to divide the discovery process to focus on the causal links between hair relaxers and cancer.
The FDA has announced it has received 106,000 medical device reports linked to recalled Philips CPAP devices, including nearly 400 deaths.
The U.S. JPML has consolidated all Tepezza lawsuits over hearing loss before one Northern Illinois federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.