Johnson’s Baby Shampoo Boycott Urged Over Harmful Chemicals

A health and environmental group is trying to pressure Johnson & Johnson to remove certain chemicals from the company’s famous baby shampoo, indicating that they may be harmful to children and can cause cancer.  Although the chemicals have been removed from Johnson’s baby shampoo in several countries, it is still present in the product sold in the United States.

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics has called for a boycott of Johnson & Johnson baby shampoo in order to force the company to remove quaternium-15 and 1,4-dioxane.

Quaternium kills bacteria, but releases formaldehyde, which is a known human carcinogen. The group has also released a new report (pdf) detailing the chemicals’ risks and how they mesh with regulatory standards.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The group says that Johnson’s Baby Shampoo sold in several nations, including Japan and the U.K., do not contain formaldehyde, but shampoo sold to parents of children in the U.S., Australia, Canada, China and Indonesia still contain the cancer-causing agents. The chemicals are not listed on the label.

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics points out that since there are formaldehyde free versions of Johnson’s Baby Shampoo sold in some countries, that it is not necessary for versions containing the chemicals and potentially endangering children to be sold in any country. The group was joined by several other organizations, including the Breast Cancer Fund, the Environmental Working Group and others, in writing a letter to Johnson & Johnson calling for the company to make a firm commitment by November 15 to remove the chemicals.

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics has been attempting to get Johnson & Johnson to remove the chemicals for almost three years with what it says was no success. When it released its latest report “Baby’s Tub is Still Toxic,” Johnson & Johnson responded by announcing that it is planning to phase the chemicals out.

“We know that some consumers are concerned about formaldehyde, which is why we offer many products without formaldehyde releasing preservatives, and are phasing out these types of preservatives in our baby products worldwide,” according to the company’s statement.

The company says that the chemicals are safe in the amounts used in its baby products and are there to protect against harmful bacteria growth. The chemicals are approved in every country in which they are used, Johnson & Johnson’s statement claims.

4 Comments

  • ClaudiaNovember 5, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    Soy una mama hispana, y es increible que estamos en una pais con una alta tecnología de control de calidad para cada producto que sale al mercado, especialmente productos para ninos, y que ahora no podamos confiar en nada.... es totalmente frustrante saber que estas en frente de las mejores marcas y no puedas confiar en ellos

  • ah puiNovember 3, 2011 at 9:21 am

    dont be rubbish!!!! the whooolllleeee nation here is using and has no problem....

  • CarolineNovember 3, 2011 at 2:04 am

    It is really surprising that they only talk about J&J. I just looked at other shampoos I have for my daughter... They all contain quaternium-15. One of them is the baby life brand from shoppers drugmart in Canada.... Great... I am speachless...

  • BriannnaNovember 2, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    Why do they not have to list the chemicals that are in the product? Isn't that what it is for and illegal to not do so?

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Caesarstone Faces Lawsuit Filed By Quartz Countertop Cutter Diagnosed With Silicosis
Caesarstone Faces Lawsuit Filed By Quartz Countertop Cutter Diagnosed With Silicosis (Posted 4 days ago)

A former quartz countertop cutter's silicosis lawsuit indicates that he could have avoided the severe lung damage if warnings had been provided about steps that would have reduced exposure to silica dust.

Cartiva Implant Recall Issued by Stryker Due to Rising Rates of Big Toe Joint Failure
Cartiva Implant Recall Issued by Stryker Due to Rising Rates of Big Toe Joint Failure (Posted 4 days ago)

Decision to recall Cartiva implants comes as manufacturer faces a growing number of lawsuits alleging that device was defectively designed and prone to failure, requiring big toe fusion surgery.