Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Bard Eclipse IVC Filter Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial to Begin May 15 April 16, 2018 Austin Kirk Add Your Comments Following a $3.6 million verdict in the first IVC filter bellwether case to go before a jury last month, C.R. Bard is set to face another trial next month, involving a complaint that alleges a Bard Eclipse Vana Cava Filter fractured and caused a woman to suffer a pulmonary embolism. The cases are part of a series of early trial dates, which are designed to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that may be repeated throughout several thousand IVC filter lawsuits pending against Bard throughout the federal court system, each raising similar allegations that the small blood clot filters are prone to move out of position, puncture internal organs or fracture, causing small pieces to travel throughout the body. Given similar questions of fact and law raised in complaints filed throughout the federal court system, the Bard IVC filter litigationย has been centralized before U.S. District Judge David G. Campbell in the District of Arizona since August 2015, for coordinated pretrial proceedings, to reduce duplicative discovery into common issues, avoid conflicting rulings from different Courts and serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and the judicial system. Learn More About IVC Filter Lawsuits Design Problems with Certain IVC Filters Linked to Severe Injuries. Lawsuits Reviewed Nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About IVC Filter Lawsuits Design Problems with Certain IVC Filters Linked to Severe Injuries. Lawsuits Reviewed Nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION A lawsuit filed by Sherr-Una Booker was the first in a series of early test trial dates, involving problems with a Bard G2 Vena Cava filter. Following a multi-week trial that began in March 2018, a federal jury awarded $2 million in compensatory damages, with 80% of the award assessed against C.R. Bard. The company was then ordered to pay another $2 million in punitive damages, which were design to punish Bard’s reckless disregard for the safety of consumers, resulting in a total verdict of $3.6 million. In an order (PDF) issued by Judge Campbell near the conclusion of that case, a trial date was set for May 15 for a second bellwether trial, involving a lawsuit filed by Doris Jones, of Georgia. A final pretrial conference has been set for May 4 before the trial begins. Jones filed her complaint (PDF) in March 2016, indicating a Bard Eclipse IVC Filter was implanted in her body in August 2010, which ultimately fractured in April 2015, and embolized in her pulmonary artery. Last month,ย Judge Campbell denied Bardโs motion for summary judgment in part. While the Court dismissed plaintiffs claims for consumer fraud, unfair trade practices, misrepresentation and negligence per se, the lawsuit will proceed to trial on claims for failure to warn and punitive damages. While the outcomes of the Jones bellwether trial will not be binding on other cases, it will be closely watched by those involved in the litigation, as it will help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that may be repeated throughout other cases. Also, the process may help facilitate the negotiation ofย IVC filter settlements, which may avoid the need for hundreds of individual trial dates in courts nationwide. In addition to litigation against Bard, hundreds of similarย Cook IVC filter lawsuitsย andย Cordis IVC filter lawsuitsย are also pending against the manufacturers of these similar medical devices. Tags: Bard, Bard Eclipse Filter, C. R. Bard, IVC Filter More IVC Filter Lawsuit Stories Cook Celect IVC Filter Lawsuit Alleges Device Fractured Into Patientโs Vein February 27, 2026 Lawsuit Alleges Cook Tulip Filter Fractured, Perforated Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) October 31, 2025 Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Verdict of $3.3M Upheld By Appeals Court August 16, 2023 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: today) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026) Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: yesterday) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)
Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: today) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)
Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: yesterday) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)