Bard IVC Filter Cases Selected For Trial Dates in Sept. 2018, Nov. 2018 and Feb. 2019

With more than 3,500 Bard IVC filter lawsuits pending in the federal court system, the U.S. District Judge presiding over the litigation has confirmed the three cases that will serve as the next “bellwether” trials, which are set to begin in September 2018, November 2018 and February 2019.

Each of the complaints raise similar allegations to those presented throughout the litigation, indicating that retrievable blood clot filters sold by C.R. Bard in recent years were defectively designed and prone to fail. The devices have been linked to injuries after they moved out of position, punctured internal organs or fracture, causing small pieces to travel throughout the body.

Lawsuits filed by Carol Kruse, Lisa and Mark Hyde and Debra Mulkey will go before juries in September, November and February, respectively, according to a case management order (PDF) issued on June 28.

The first Bard IVC filter bellwether trial went before a jury in March 2018, resulting in aย $3.6 million verdict, which was recently upheld by Judge Campbell during post-trial motions. However, Bard prevailed in a second trial last month, which ended in a defense verdict.

Mulkey’s claim was originally expected to go before a jury starting on September 18, 2018. However, the order indicates that she has been experiencing health issues that make her availability for that trial uncertain. Instead of moving the trial date, the Court has replaced her bellwether claim with the Kruse case and reset Mulkey’s case for trial in February 2019.

In addition to cases against Bard, another 3,750ย Cook IVC filter lawsuitsย are centralized as part of a separate MDL, involving similar allegations of design defects. Last month, a Texasย jury awarded $1.2 millionย in damages to a firefighter who suffered injuries from a Cook Celect filter.

While the outcome of these bellwether trials are not be binding of remaining claims in the litigation, they are being closely watched by parties involved, and may influence eventual negotiations to reachย IVC filter settlements, which would avoid the need for thousands of separate trials to be held nationwide.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery.
A Georgia couple’s lawsuit claims the makers of Dupixent failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of mycosis fungoides, a type of T-cell lymphoma.