RSS
TwitterFacebook

Bayer Agrees to Increased Payment of $2B To Settle Roundup Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma Cases Diagnosed Over Next Four Years

  • Written by: Irvin Jackson
  • 1 Comment

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

After a federal judge previously signaled that an attempt to bind individuals not yet diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma from Roundup to a class action settlement may not be proper or fair, Bayer has revised the deal and increased the compensation that it will pay to resolve cases diagnosed over the next four years.

In June 2020, Bayer announced that it would spend more than $10 billion in Roundup settlements, which the manufacturer indicated would resolve most pending lawsuits filed by individuals diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma following exposure to the weedkiller, and included $1.25 billion set aside to address future claims.

While individual settlements are moving forward for previously diagnosed and filed claims, the U.S. District Judge presiding over the federal litigation expressed skepticism about the “propriety and fairness” of a proposed class action settlement that would bind individuals not yet diagnosed with cancer, and limit their right to pursue lawsuits through the court system in the future.

As a result, the proposed Roundup class action settlement was withdrawn by the parties, and additional negotiations have been ongoing over the past six months.

In a motion for preliminary approval (PDF) filed on February 3, the parties outlined the key features of a new proposal to settle Roundup non-Hodgkins lymphoma cases diagnosed in the future, including an increase in the total funding up to $2 billion and a resolution program where class members do not lose the right to file a lawsuit if they decide not to accept the amount awarded.

“The present agreement has been rebuilt from the studs on up,” according to the 83 page proposal submitted by lawyers. “First, and foremost, the present agreement is based on conventional notions of claim resolution rather than issue preclusive determination. The new Settlement contains a straightforward compensation fund to make offers to class members who have or develop NHL, together with a broad program of diagnostic assistance for NHL risk and other programmatic benefits.”

Key features include a compensation fund that will be optional for individuals diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma, providing awards that will range between $10,000 and $200,000 per person in exchange for a release. However, if they choose not to participate, future claimants maintain their right to file a Roundup lawsuit against Bayer and it’s Monsanto subsidiary.

The program would also include free legal assistance and representation to help navigate and evaluate the settlement benefits, a diagnostic testing program and outreach efforts to bring users of Roundup into the diagnostic and compensation programs.

Under terms of the Roundup settlement, Monsanto will also seek permission from the EPA to include information on the weedkiller label about the link between Roundup and non-Hodgkins lymphoma, as well as a link to information about whether exposure causes the cancer.

Bayer has agreed to a 60% increase in the amount that will be paid to fund the settlement, with up to $2 billion in payments over the first four years. After this initial period expires, the parties may seek to extend the settlement, with additional funding provided above the initial $2 billion.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Photo Courtesy of Mike Mozart via Flickr Creative Commons

1 comment

  1. Marilyn Reply

    My husband has Parkinsons!
    He has always taken care of our yard using roundup from around 1984 untill 2019.
    He was healthy for the most part. In 2013 he was diagnosed with Parkinsons disease and he is in horrible health. He was not even 50 years old when he got Parkinsons and now he is not able to work or do much of anything. We have been married for 37 years and Parkinsons has taken so much from us. I’ve always known it had to be some type of chemical that caused this disease. Now we have fou.d out he had a tumor on his liver! At this time we have not had any tests ran on his liver. I weep as I watch this disease destroy my husband day by day. We not only struggle with this awful disease but we stuggle mentally, and financially!

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact A Lawyer

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.