Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Half A Million Portable Bed Rails Recalled After Deaths, Entrapment ReportsDesign allows sleepers to become trapped between the rail and the mattress, CPSC warns December 7, 2021 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsFollowing reports of at least two deaths, federal health officials are urging consumers to stop using nearly 500,000 portable bed rails, which may pose an entrapment and suffocation hazard.The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced theย Drive DeVilbiss Healthcare bed rails recall on December 6, warning that design problems may allow a user to become pinned between the mattress and the bed rail, increasing the risk of death, entrapment and suffocation if they roll off the bed.The bedside rails are portable and feature separate pieces that can be attached to a standard bed, by sliding a piece of rail under the mattress. They are intended to help adults get out of bed, but the CPSC warns that they actually pose a serious hazard if left in place while sleeping, potentially causing individuals to become trapped between the metal bar and the mattress while sleeping, or between parts of the bedrail itself.The CPSC has become aware of two reports of entrapment deaths linked to the Bed Assist Handle bed rails, which occurred in 2011 and 2015, involving a 93-year-old woman at her home and 92-year-old man at an assisted living facility in Canada. The CPSC indicates both fatalities were caused by the bed rails not being securely fastened to the bed, allowing the users to become entrapped between the rails and mattress.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe recall involves approximately 496,100 Bed Assist Handles with model number 15064, Bed Assist Rail with Folding Board with model number 15062, Home Bed Assist Handleย with model number RTL15073, and Home Bed Assist Handles with model number RTL15063-ADJ.The products are made of steel tubing either in white or chrome and include either a black non-slip padding on the grip handle and under-bed frame or a wooden under-bed board attached to the grip handle. Customers may identify whether their bed rail products are recalled by locating the model number printed next to the brand name Drive on a label located on the product metal tubing.The recalled bed rails were manufactured by Drive DeVilbiss Healthcare and were sold at medical supply stores nationwide and online atย www.amazon.comย andย www.walmart.com from October 2007 through December 2021 for between $30 and $80.ย Approximately 68,000 units were also distributed for sale in Canada and Mexico.Consumers, hospitals and nursing home facilities are being asked to stop using the recalled bed rails immediately and to contact Drive DeVilbiss Healthcare at 877-467-3099 and reference the recall number 22-025 to receive a full refund.Bed Rail Safety ConcernsBed rail safety has been a focus of federal regulators for years, seeking to address issues that occur if the rail shifts away from the bed frame, creating a gap between the bed rail and the mattress. The gaps create an entrapment and strangulation hazard to the users which could potentially result in death.The devices are often used in nursing homes to aide with residents who have trouble getting into, and out of, bed. They are also frequently used in home care situations where an elderly or disabled person is being cared for at home. A growing number of injuries and deaths associated with bed rails has raised a great deal of concern as to whether the products should even be available on the market.In December 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued aย warning problems with similar portable bed rail products, which were linked to a risk of entrapment. An investigation by the FDA and CPSC revealed there had been at least 155 deaths and five injuries linked to the use of portable bed rails between January 2003 and September 2012.Earlier this year, the CPSC issued a bed rail warning, instructing consumers to stop using three models of Bed Handles Inc., portable adult bed rail products indicating after receiving four bed rail fatalities involving elderly or disabled individuals.The agency warned that because Bed Handles Inc., is no longer in business, no recall remedy is available for owners. Rather, customers should immediately stop using and discard the Bed Handles Inc. products to prevent this risk of entrapment and asphyxiation. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Bed Rail, Bed Rail Recall, Entrapment, SuffocationMore Lawsuit Stories Dupixent Skin Cancer Lawsuit Filed After Man Diagnosed With Mycosis Fungoides October 20, 2026 Chemo Port Fracture Lawsuit Alleges SmartPort Problems Led to Removal Surgery October 20, 2026 Tylenol Autism and ADHD Lawsuits Advance as Appeals Court Rejects Rehearing October 20, 2026 0 Comments PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent Skin Cancer Lawsuit Filed After Man Diagnosed With Mycosis Fungoides (Posted: yesterday)A man’s Dupixent skin cancer lawsuit claims the eczema treatment led to a CTCL diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Risks Lead Experts to Recommend Skin Biopsies Before Treatment (10/16/2026)Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (10/01/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026) Fujifilm and Olympus Scope Infection Risks Highlight Growing Need for Advanced Disinfection Systems: Report (Posted: 2 days ago)Concerns about life-threatening infections associated with reusable medical scopes are increasing the need for advanced disinfection technology to protect patients from bacterial contamination.MORE ABOUT: SCOPE INFECTION LAWSUITOlympus Medical Device Warning Letter Follows FDA Inspections of Six Manufacturing Facilities (10/16/2026)Olympus Scope Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over ERCP Infection (09/03/2026)Olympus Colonoscopy Lawsuit Over C. Diff Infection Set for Status Hearing in September 2026 (08/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 5 days ago)A Georgia womanโs spinal cord stimulator lawsuit alleges she suffered painful shocks and permanent injuries after an Abbott device’s leads migrated out of position.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMaster Complaint for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Filed (10/12/2026)Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (10/05/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)
Dupixent Skin Cancer Lawsuit Filed After Man Diagnosed With Mycosis Fungoides (Posted: yesterday)A man’s Dupixent skin cancer lawsuit claims the eczema treatment led to a CTCL diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Risks Lead Experts to Recommend Skin Biopsies Before Treatment (10/16/2026)Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (10/01/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026)
Fujifilm and Olympus Scope Infection Risks Highlight Growing Need for Advanced Disinfection Systems: Report (Posted: 2 days ago)Concerns about life-threatening infections associated with reusable medical scopes are increasing the need for advanced disinfection technology to protect patients from bacterial contamination.MORE ABOUT: SCOPE INFECTION LAWSUITOlympus Medical Device Warning Letter Follows FDA Inspections of Six Manufacturing Facilities (10/16/2026)Olympus Scope Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over ERCP Infection (09/03/2026)Olympus Colonoscopy Lawsuit Over C. Diff Infection Set for Status Hearing in September 2026 (08/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 5 days ago)A Georgia womanโs spinal cord stimulator lawsuit alleges she suffered painful shocks and permanent injuries after an Abbott device’s leads migrated out of position.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMaster Complaint for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Filed (10/12/2026)Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (10/05/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)