Birmingham Metal-on-Metal Hip Problems Led To Need For Revision Surgery: Lawsuit

A Minnesota man indicates that he is one of hundreds of victims in every state in the country who has suffered injuries due to Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) system complications, according to allegations raised in a product liability lawsuit filed against Smith & Nephew over problems with the metal-on-metal hip implant. 

Michael P. Tracy filed the complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland on March 28, indicating that the Smith & Nephew Birmingham hip implanted in his body was defective and carried a high risk of failure.

Tracy indicates that he underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) on his right hip in February 2008, at which time surgeons used the Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) system. However, in December 2017, he had to undergo revision surgery after the metal-on-metal hip implant failed, at which time the surgeon discovered that the failure of the implant led to the development of a “creamy reactive fluid around Tracy’s hip joint.

Learn More About

Hip Replacements Lawsuits

Lawsuits are being reviewed for several different dangerous and defective hip replacement systems.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For Compensation

The Smith & Nephew BHR was one of the first metal-on-metal hip replacement systems on the market, and concerns were raised about its safety even before it was approved.

A competitor, Wright Medical, attempted to stop the devices from getting approved, filing a citizen’s petition with the FDA in 2006, asking the agency to reject the application for the BHR, due to concerns over the adequacy of the clinical trials used to obtain premarket approval.

Due to a high rate of problems following Birmingham hip resurfacing, Smith & Nephew subsequently withdrew the system from the marketing in the U.S. market and eventually issued a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing recall in September 2015.

“At the time of the initial implant procedure, neither Plaintiff nor his surgeon were aware of the myriad problems associated with the BHR when used in a THA operation,” Tracy’s lawsuit states. “In fact, Smith & Nephew continued to promote the THA total hip system as a safe alternative to other metal-on-metal hip devices despite the THA not being a safer alternative and not being approved for sale in the U.S.”

In May 2017, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) ordered that all product liability lawsuits over Birmingham Hip Resurfacing be centralized before U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Blake in the District of Maryland.

As hip replacement lawyers continue to review and file cases for individuals nationwide, it is ultimately expected that hundreds of cases may be brought in the coming weeks and months.


"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Framework for Talcum Powder Science Day Before New MDL Judge Proposed by Parties
Framework for Talcum Powder Science Day Before New MDL Judge Proposed by Parties (Posted yesterday)

The new federal judge overseeing all talcum powder lawsuits has called for a Science Day to educate the court ahead of planned Daubert hearings which could decide if bellwether test trials can move forward.