Bisphenol A Safety to be Researched Further by FDA

After standing by their controversial position that Bisphenol A (BPA) is safe in baby bottles and other consumer products, the FDA indicates that they will now review additional research and may carry out further studies on the potential long term health impact of the chemical.

Bisphenol A, which is commonly referred to as BPA, is used in a variety of consumer products, such as baby bottles, sports bottles, food containers and the liners of some cans. It is used to harden plastic and to prevent leaks or bacterial contamination in the canning industry.

Several studies have suggested that long-term exposure to low doses of Bisphenol A in consumer products could pose long term health risks in humans. As a result, several consumer groups and lawmakers in the United States have called on baby product manufacturers to stop using the chemical and the use of BPA in baby bottles was banned in Canada.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The FDA has consistently maintained their position that Bisphenol A is safe at the levels currently found in plastic baby bottles and other consumer products. However, the agency has been criticized by various experts who indicate that the study relied on by the FDA was funded by the chemical industry and other independent studies were not taken into account.

In September 2008, the National Toxicology Program of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released a final report about the safety of Bisphenol A, indicating that there is “some concern” that the plastic chemical may cause problems with development and health.

An advisory panel of outside experts was convened by the FDA on September 16, 2008 to discuss the potential health concerns and safety of BPA in consumer products.

The panel concluded that the agency’s statement that BPA was safe in baby bottles and other products does not consider all available and credible evidence, indicating that “the margins of safety defined by the FDA as ‘adequate’ are, in fact, inadequate.”

According to a letter from the FDA released on Monday, the agency is now re-evaluating its research on Bisphenol A and determining whether additional studies are needed to look into the safety of the chemical. However, this does not necessarily mean that the FDA plans to change their stance on Bisphenol A safety.

1 Comments

  • Legislation to Ban BPA in Bottles and Food Containers Introduced - AboutLawsuits.comMarch 16, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    [...] concerns over the safety of BPA have grown in recent years, as experts have suggested that low doses of BPA can seep into the food [...]

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Depo-Provera Meningioma Brain Tumors Risks May Have Been Ignored by Pfizer for Decades
Depo-Provera Meningioma Brain Tumors Risks May Have Been Ignored by Pfizer for Decades (Posted 2 days ago)

After decades of medical research and reported Depo-Provera side effects, Pfizer should have known that its birth control shot increases the risks of meningioma brain tumors, yet failed to warn women or the medical community.

Philadelphia Roundup Lawsuit Ends in Defense Verdict for Monsanto
Philadelphia Roundup Lawsuit Ends in Defense Verdict for Monsanto (Posted 2 days ago)

Bayer and Monsanto prevailed in a Roundup lawsuit that went to trial in Philadelphia this week, after a jury found that exposure to the herbicide did not cause a man to develop non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.