Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Boston Scientific S-ICD Defibrillator Electrode Recall Due To Fracture Risk February 12, 2021 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsFederal health officials have announced a Class I recall involving certain Boston Scientific implantable defibrillators, following dozens of reports involving problems where electrodes fractured and failed to provide electrical shock treatments, which may have resulted in more than two dozen serious injuries and one death.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the Boston Scientific defibrillator recall on February 10, warning that the electrodes for the implantable life-saving devices have the potential to fracture at a specific point which could cause operation failure.The recall affects the EMBLEM S-ICD Subcutaneous Electrode Model 3501, which is part of Boston Scientific S-ICD System implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The devices are implanted under a patientโs skin in the upper chest area to provide electrical shock therapy to stop dangerous heart rhythms or cardiac arrest.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBoston Scientific and the FDA are aware of at least 27 complaints regarding the implanted device fracturing, resulting in at least 26 serious injuries and one reported death.Officials warn that in the event of the device fracturing, it could become unable to deliver therapy to slow very fast heartbeats from cardiac arrest, or could require the need for additional surgery to replace failed devices.Boston Scientific issued an Important Medical Device Advisory letter on December 2, 2020, instructing healthcare professionals to promptly identify patients with the impacted devices implanted to notify them of the issue and evaluate the risks of using affected devices compared to replacing them.The manufacturer also recommended healthcare professionals modify their patient monitoring schedules by using the LATITUDE remote monitoring system to detect any alerts and to perform a system follow-up every three months. Patients with suspected device fractures should undergo chest radiography of the entire electrode length to confirm.While the manufacturer recommends replacing any electrode that is shown to have signs of a break with high impedance alert, routine replacement of an electrode without fracture evidence is not recommended.However, patients with a history of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, who are unable to reliably follow up every three months, or those who are unable to hear beeping tones from the LATITUDE monitoring system should evaluate the risks they could face due to an electrode fracture, the manufacturer warned.The devices were manufactured by Boston Scientific of Marlborough, Massachusetts. They were distributed from June 2017 to present. The manufacturer indicates approximately 19,919 units are impacted by the recall.The FDA has classified the recall as a Class I recall, indicating it is the most serious of its kind, and there is a reasonable probability that the use of the product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.Customers or healthcare professionals with additional questions are being encouraged to contact Boston Scientific Technical Services at (800)-CARDIAC (227-3422) or by email at tech.services@bsci.com. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Boston Scientific, Electrode Recall, Heart Rhythm, ICD, Medical Device RecallMore Lawsuit Stories Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges August 11, 2026 Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week August 11, 2026 Gree Dehumidifier Lawsuit Alleges Defective Appliance Caused House Fire August 11, 2026 2 Comments Joseph August 19, 2021 This Boston scientific should be ashamed of them selfs ,they new there was something wrong with this difublator when they put them out ,I called Boston scientific to see what to do and they will do nothing for you ,now I have to get the difublator out it does not work this company should be obligated to pay for this to get done and this is serios surgery to have it removed ,Boston scientific takes no responsibility for there mistakes , and they never notified me ,I got a call from my doctor 6 months after the recall ,beware of this company Jacqueline May 27, 2021 I have the Boston Scientific Emblem S-ICD and it has stopped working, and I am scared that if I go into cardiac arrest I will be in serious trouble. Waiting to see what my Cardiologist is going to do!! URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: today)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026) Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: yesterday)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026) AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 4 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)
Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: today)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)
Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: yesterday)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)
AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 4 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)