Boston Scientific Recall NexStent Monorail, NexStent Carotid Stent and Monorail Delivery System

|

Boston Scientific has issued a Class I recall for their NexStent Monorail, NexStent Carotid Stent and Monorail Delivery System, due to a defect which could allow the tip of the stent delivery system to detach during a carotid artery stenting procedure.

The recalled stents are used to treat blockages in carotid artery disease. Carotid arteries, which are located on either side of the neck, supply blood to the brain.

During carotid artery stenting (CAS), the physician places the stent, which is self-expanding, in the artery to keep it open and to help prevent future narrowing which could disrupt blood flow.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

The Boston Scientific carotid stent recall, which was posted on the FDA website August 14, 2008, was classified as a “Class I Recall” because the use of the potentially defective stents carries a reasonable probability of serious adverse health consequences or death.

If the tip of the stent delivery system detaches, it could cause a stroke, vessel wall injury, an increased amount of time to complete the procedure or an additional emergency surgery to remove the detached tip of the stent.

Boston Scientific manufactured the recalled NexStent Monorail, NexStent Carotid Stent and Monorail Delivery Systems between June 12, 2007, through May 2, 2008. However, the recall is only directed to cardiologists and medical providers, and does not apply to individuals who already have the carotid stent implanted. According to Boston Scientific, the problems are only known to occur during the stenting procedure.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Florida womanโ€™s lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific altered their SCS device batteries, firmware and stimulation features without adequate safety testing approved by the FDA.
A Depo-Provera lawsuit filed against Pfizer says the manufacturer knew Depo-Provera could stimulate brain tumor growth before the birth control shots hit the market, yet failed to warn doctors and patients.
Two years after allowing thousands of incomplete Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits to be submitted due to statutes of limitation laws, a federal judge says those cases should be filed individually or dismissed.