Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Judge Dismisses Camp Lejeune Lawsuits Filed Before Exhausting Administrative Settlement Options Under New Law Some plaintiffs will have to refile their claims under the new Camp Lejeune law and go through the administrative settlement process before they can sue the government for their injuries. December 28, 2022 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Camp Lejeune settlements may now be available for injuries caused by contaminated water at the Marine base between 1950s and 1980s New law requires notice of potential claims and a six month window for U.S. government to exhaust administrative settlement options Court denied a handful of Camp Lejeune lawsuits filed only days after the new law was signed by President Biden, requiring claims to go through the administrative process first Thousands of Marines and family members exposed to toxic water have filed administrative notice of their claims and made demands for Camp Lejeune settlement benefits LEARN MORE ABOUT THE STEPS IN PURSUING A CAMP LEJEUNE WATER SETTLEMENT A federal judge has dismissed several Camp Lejeune lawsuits filed only days after President Biden signed new legislation that allowed claims to be pursued for injuries caused by contaminated water at the U.S. marine base, indicating the plaintiffs failed to exhaust the administrative settlement options under the law. Camp Lejeune is a Marine Corps base in North Carolina, which was plagued with water contamination problems between the 1950s and 1980s, exposing millions of service members, family members and other individuals to toxic chemicals in the drinking water. Although various cancers and other devastating injuries have been directly linked to contaminants in the water, by the time the extent of the Camp Lejeune water contamination problems were known to veterans and family members living on the base, the ten-year North Carolina statute of limitations allowed the U.S. government to deny all claims, and hundreds of prior lawsuits were dismissed. On August 10, President Biden signed landmark new legislation, which corrected the federal governments failure to compensate veterans and military family members, opening a two year window for Camp Lejeune water contamination lawsuits to be filed to be filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, which has been granted exclusive jurisdiction over the claims. Stay Up-to-Date About Camp Lejeune Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Camp Lejeune lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Camp Lejeune Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Camp Lejeune lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Prior to filing a lawsuit under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, the new law requires each claimant provide notice of their claim to the U.S. Navy, which must deny the claim in writing or fail to resolve the claim within six months. However, individuals who previously submitted Camp Lejeune claims that were denied by the U.S. Government prior to this new law being enacted, attempted to immediately reinitiated their lawsuits, arguing that the notice requirements of the Act were satisfied when they originally presented their claims years ago. Within days after President Biden signed the Honoring Our PACT Act in August 2022, dozens of individuals filed lawsuits under the new law, seeking damages for injuries caused by contaminated water at Camp Lejeune between 1953 and 1987, which had previously been denied by the U.S. government. However, those plaintiffs indicated that they were pursuing claims under the new Act based upon administrative notice provided prior to the new law going into effect. In September, U.S. District Judge James C. Dever III raised questions about whether these early plaintiffs complied with the Camp Lejeune Justice Act requirements, calling for evidence to be presented to establish how each claim was submitted and the date the U.S. government denied the claim under the Act, together with a brief explaining how an administrative claim brought before the Act was passed complies with the new requirements. Both plaintiffs and the government filed briefs supporting their stances. Plaintiffs argued that the Camp Lejeune Justice Act requires nothing more than the filing of a claim with the U.S. Navy setting forth the facts that led to a plaintiff’s injury and a demand for a sum of money, which each plaintiff did years ago. However, the government argued that the new law requires that administrative Camp Lejeune settlement options be exhausted before any lawsuit is filed in the new Act, to provide the U.S. government with the opportunity to properly evaluate and attempt to negotiate a resolution for the new cause of action created by the legislature. Judge Rules Plaintiffs Must Refile Camp Lejeune Claims Under New Law On December 20, Judge Denver issued a court order (PDF) dismissing a number of those early claims, indicating that plaintiffs must first exhaust administrative remedies provided by the Camp Lejeune Justice Act before filing a lawsuit against the government. “One of the core purposes of administrative exhaustion is to facilitate administrative settlement. The Camp Lejeune Justice Act created a new federal cause of action and a new administrative exhaustion requirement for such claims and opened the United States to new liability,” Judge Denver wrote. “Congress’s creation of a new cause of action under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act created a need for the Navy to review administratively these new claims…in order to expedite fair settlements in accordance with the purposes of administrative exhaustion.” The decision means the plaintiffs will have to refile their claims under the new act, once the U.S. government denies their claim or if a Camp Lejeune settlement is not reached within six months after proper notice of the claim is provided. Camp Lejeune Justice Act Filing Requirements In addition to allowing previously denied claims to move forward, the Camp Lejeune Justice Act also allows any individual, or surviving family members, to pursue settlement benefits for injuries caused by contaminated water on the base, even if they never previously attempted to pursue a claim. For new cases, the Act requires that notice of the Camp Lejeune water contamination claim must be provided to the U.S. Navy under the requirements of 28 U.S. Code § 2675. The U.S. Navy JAG Corps has posted information about how to file a claim under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022, outlining the required steps needed to file a Camp Lejeune water lawsuit. Each claimant must include a Camp Lejeune Justice Act Claim form (PDF), providing specific information about their lawsuit, including: Status at time of exposure to Camp Lejeune water (Member of the Armed Forces; Military Family Member or Dependent; Civil Service Employee; Civilian; Contractor Working for Private Company on Base; Unborn Individual Exposed In Utero) Where you resided at the time of exposure (Terawa Terrace Housing; Hospital Point Housing; Other On-Base Housing; Outside of Camp Lejeune) Whether you worked at Hadnot Point Industrial Area in Camp Lejeune Nature of your injury (Personal Injury Caused by Water at Camp Lejeune; Wrongful Death Following Exposure to Camp Lejeune Water) Specific type of cancer or other injury that is the basis of the Camp Lejeune lawsuit The form also requires that each individual specify the amount of their Camp Lejeune claim in U.S. dollars, certifying that it will be accepted as a full and final Camp Lejeune water settlement amount if offered by the U.S. Government. Failure to specify the total amount of damages sought from the Camp Lejeune water contamination during this process may result in a forfeiture of their rights. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Camp Lejeune, Military, North Carolina, Veterans, Veterans Affairs, Water Contamination More Camp Lejeune Lawsuit Stories Information About 2,500 Camp Lejeune Injury Claims May Influence Settlement Process October 27, 2025 Trichloroethylene Exposure Linked to Parkinson’s Disease Risk: Study October 8, 2025 Court Urged To Press Forward With Camp Lejeune Lawsuit Deadlines During Government Shutdown October 6, 2025 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Side Effects From Depo-Provera Shots Led to Brain Tumor, Multiple Surgeries: Lawsuit (Posted: today) A Depo-Provera lawsuit claims the birth control injections led a woman to develop multiple brain tumors which needed repeated surgeries to address. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITTop Medical Device Recalls and Warnings of 2025 Resulting in Lawsuits and Investigations (12/29/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit To Be Prepared for Trial by December 2026 (12/23/2025)Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Approved by FDA, As Lawsuits Move Forward (12/17/2025) Presentations on How Hair Relaxers Cause Cancer Will Be Heard by MDL Judge This Week (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge will receive presentations this week on how hair relaxers cause cancer and other important scientific points in the litigation. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Manufacturers Push for Evidence Many Plaintiffs Did Not Likely Keep (12/10/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit MDL Status Hearings Scheduled Throughout 2026 (11/13/2025)Update on Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status To Be Provided to Court at MDL Hearing (11/05/2025) Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Continue To Be Filed, As MDL Stay Extended (Posted: 4 days ago) Syngenta and Chevron continue to face a growing number of Paraquat lawsuits as the parties attempt to finalize a settlement agreement. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Parkinson’s Disease Settlement Payout Amounts Still Being Finalized (10/03/2025)Paraquat MDL Lawsuit Deadlines Extended Again, as Settlement Details Finalized (08/12/2025)Pesticide Exposure Could Lead to Higher Rheumatoid Arthritis Risks for Women Farm Workers: Study (07/23/2025)
Court Urged To Press Forward With Camp Lejeune Lawsuit Deadlines During Government Shutdown October 6, 2025
Side Effects From Depo-Provera Shots Led to Brain Tumor, Multiple Surgeries: Lawsuit (Posted: today) A Depo-Provera lawsuit claims the birth control injections led a woman to develop multiple brain tumors which needed repeated surgeries to address. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITTop Medical Device Recalls and Warnings of 2025 Resulting in Lawsuits and Investigations (12/29/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit To Be Prepared for Trial by December 2026 (12/23/2025)Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Approved by FDA, As Lawsuits Move Forward (12/17/2025)
Presentations on How Hair Relaxers Cause Cancer Will Be Heard by MDL Judge This Week (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge will receive presentations this week on how hair relaxers cause cancer and other important scientific points in the litigation. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Manufacturers Push for Evidence Many Plaintiffs Did Not Likely Keep (12/10/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit MDL Status Hearings Scheduled Throughout 2026 (11/13/2025)Update on Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status To Be Provided to Court at MDL Hearing (11/05/2025)
Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Continue To Be Filed, As MDL Stay Extended (Posted: 4 days ago) Syngenta and Chevron continue to face a growing number of Paraquat lawsuits as the parties attempt to finalize a settlement agreement. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Parkinson’s Disease Settlement Payout Amounts Still Being Finalized (10/03/2025)Paraquat MDL Lawsuit Deadlines Extended Again, as Settlement Details Finalized (08/12/2025)Pesticide Exposure Could Lead to Higher Rheumatoid Arthritis Risks for Women Farm Workers: Study (07/23/2025)