Bill Proposed to Require Carbon Monoxide Detectors in NJ Schools

|

A group of New Jersey lawmakers are trying to pass new legislation to require the use of carbon monoxide detectors in schools; a step that only two other states have taken to reduce the risk of children suffering brain damage from exposure to carbon monoxide leaks that may occur during the school day.ย 

Several Assembly Democrats are preparing to introduce a bill that establishes the requirement following a number of recent incidences involving carbon monoxide poisoning, including at least two schools that were evacuated in recent weeks, causing dozens of students and adults to receive hospital treatment for carbon monoxide exposure. The bill is currently in the drafting stage.

A carbon monoxide leak at a school in Tennessee earlier this month sent more than 100 people to the hospital, and a similar incident at an Atlanta elementary school caused about 50 people to receive treatment for carbon monoxide poisoningย in December. In both cases, the schools lacked functioning carbon monoxide detectors and the leaks were only discovered after children got sick and caretakers became suspicious of the cause.

|
|

Neither school district required that the schools have carbon monoxide detectors. In fact, only Maryland and Connecticut currently require carbon monoxide detectors in schools. The group of New Jersey lawmakers seek to make their state the third state to have such a requirement.

Carbon Monoxide Alarms Protect Against “Hidden” Gas Leaks

Carbon monoxide is a significantly toxic gas that is colorless, odorless, tasteless and lacks any sort of irritating factor that could allow someone to detect its presence. Because people often fail to promptly recognize symptoms of carbon monoxide, they are the leading cause of fatal poisonings in the United States.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, carbon monoxide poisoning kills about 500 people in the U.S. annually, and is linked to about 15,000 emergency room visits. In many cases, the injuries or deaths could have been prevented by the use of carbon monoxide detectors and proper maintenance of heating systems and generators, which could result in the availability of financial benefits for victims through a carbon monoxide lawsuit.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Georgia couple’s lawsuit claims the makers of Dupixent failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of mycosis fungoides, a type of T-cell lymphoma.
In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials.
Women who experienced infection, chronic inflammation, implant instability or other complications after internal bra mesh procedures are now questioning whether those risks were fully disclosed before implantation.