Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
CarMax Accused of Selling Recalled Cars Without Safety Repairs June 11, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsTwo consumer groups are calling for an investigation into the sales practices of CarMax, indicating that the used car retailer is selling vehicles with unrepaired safety recalls that pose may serious and life threatening risks to customers and the general public.ย The California Public Interest Research Group and the Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety Foundation have started a petition on Change.org, asking the California attorney general and the Department of Motor Vehicles to investigate and stop the used car giant CarMax from selling recalled cars without repairing safety defects.Researchers from the two groups visited two CarMax stores in California, one in Oxnard and another in Sacramento, where they cross checked vehicle identification numbers with a federal database containing recalls and whether that specific vehicle had been repaired.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAccording to the findings, more than 10 percent of the nearly 500 cars on the Oxnard CarMax sale lot had unrepaired recalls and seven vehicles were subject to two or more unrepaired safety recalls. The investigation further found the Sacramento CarMax vehicles contained an inventory of nearly 10 percent of vehicle subject to safety recalls, all of which were unrepaired.The consumer groups claim that the safety recalls seen among vehicles at the Sacramento and Oxnard CarMax stores were subject to were not just minor defects, but potentially fatal safety risks.A few of the safety defects detailed in their report indicated vehicles contained springs that can break and puncture the fuel tank posing fire risks, spontaneously unlatching doors that could open in traffic, bolt recalls that could cause the engine to stall in traffic and render the airbags inactive, brake failures, faulty ignition switches, and rupturing Takata airbags.The consumer groups claimed that all of these safety defects pose serious and potentially life threatening risks to customers, and claimed that some of the vehicles on the lots were currently being recalled due to fatalities caused by the defects.The report indicates that CarMax was selling vehicles with recalled Takata airbags, which have been linked to problems where they may overinflate and rupture, sending shrapnel into the passenger compartment. At least six deaths and hundreds of injuries have been linked to the Takata airbags in recent months.CarMax was also found to be selling vehicles subject to recent GM recalls over faulty ignition switches, which have impacted over 17 million vehicles that may suddenly turn off if heavy keychains are used or if the ignition is jarred, such as may occur in an accident. This may cause the airbags to fail, exposing passengers to an increased risk of serious injury. Over 100 deaths and many more injuries have been linked to the GM airbag problems so far.Though Federal law prohibits car dealers from selling vehicles with safety defects, no law exists to mandates used car dealers or even rental car companies to repair recalls before sale or service. The consumer groups are calling on the California states attorney and the Department of Motor Vehicles to mandate the repair of recalls before sale from used car dealerships.Although CarMax may not currently be mandated to repair recalls on used vehicles, the consumer groups claim the company may still be in violation of certain California regulations, including โbait and switchโ infractions and providing false and misleading information to customers. The groups claim that CarMax lures customers in with the promise of a car that is safe and reliable but is then switched to a defective unsafe vehicle. In addition, CarMax advertises that their vehicles are โcertifiedโ and run through a 125-point inspection to guarantee safety and quality, when in reality the consumer groups say some of the vehicles are โticking time-bombsโ.One incident report the groups refers to in their petition occurred in Irvine, California, where a couple with children purchased a โCarMax Quality Certifiedโ Dodge Ram 1500 from CarMax on May 19, 2015 because they wanted a safer vehicle to transport their children. After they purchased the truck they were informed by Chrysler that a safety recall had been in effect for over a year on that vehicle due to the drive shaft reportedly separating from the rear axle.When the couple tried to return the vehicle to CarMax, the dealer denied their claims and told them it was their problem now. Just 11 days after purchasing the vehicle, without warning, the drive shaft separated from the axle and the truck fell apart on the freeway and caught on fire. The couple and their 12 year old daughter barely escaped the vehicle before it burst into flames, which closed down the freeway for nearly four hours while first responders fought to put out the fire.Despite the reports and the allegations, CarMax claims they are not authorized by automobile manufacturers to perform safety recall repairs. However, the consumer groups claim the company brought in $10 billion worth of revenue last year and could afford to have the vehicles serviced by certified dealers.Currently, U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx and National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator (NHTSA) Mark Rosekind are pressing for Congress to pass legislation that would prevent customers from receiving rental cars or used vehicles subject to safety recalls until they have been repaired.The legislation would be included in an infrastructure bill known as the Grow America Act and would detail procedural rules for requiring the rental agencies and used car dealers to go about fixing the defects in the manner that new car dealerships follow currently.The NHTSA is pressing for the legislation that would mandate used dealers and rental companies to follow similar protocols that a new car dealer would due to the recent influx in vehicle recalls. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Airbag Recall, Auto Recall, Carmax, General Motors (GM), Ignition Switch, TakataMore Lawsuit Stories Mounjaro NAION Lawsuit Claims Side Effects Led to Permanent Vision Loss May 21, 2026 Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery May 21, 2026 Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Urinary Sphincter Failed, Required Additional Surgery May 21, 2026 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Mounjaro NAION Lawsuit Claims Side Effects Led to Permanent Vision Loss (Posted: yesterday)A Mounjaro vision loss lawsuit accuses Eli Lilly of failing to properly investigate the drug’s side effects and provide proper warnings before marketing it to the public.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic and Mounjaro Drug Class Linked to 35% Higher NAION Vision Loss Risk (05/14/2026)Ozempic Vision Loss Lawsuit Highlights Devastating Consequences of NAION Diagnosis (05/04/2026)GLP-1 Dementia, Alzheimerโs Disease Risks Questioned in New Study (04/27/2026) Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (Posted: 2 days ago)According to a recently filed lawsuit, exposure to Suboxone oral film strips caused an Illinois man to suffer severe tooth decay that required extensive dental work.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)Judge Says Suboxone โSchedule Aโ Lawsuits Should Be Filed Individually or Dismissed (04/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Resulted in Severe Paralysis: Lawsuit (Posted: 3 days ago)A man who became paralyzed has filed an Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit after the original device failed, causing him to suffer electric shocks.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Eterna Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Resulted in Worsening Pain (05/13/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges SCS Lead Failure Caused Nerve Damage (05/06/2026)Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (04/29/2026)
Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery May 21, 2026
Mounjaro NAION Lawsuit Claims Side Effects Led to Permanent Vision Loss (Posted: yesterday)A Mounjaro vision loss lawsuit accuses Eli Lilly of failing to properly investigate the drug’s side effects and provide proper warnings before marketing it to the public.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic and Mounjaro Drug Class Linked to 35% Higher NAION Vision Loss Risk (05/14/2026)Ozempic Vision Loss Lawsuit Highlights Devastating Consequences of NAION Diagnosis (05/04/2026)GLP-1 Dementia, Alzheimerโs Disease Risks Questioned in New Study (04/27/2026)
Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (Posted: 2 days ago)According to a recently filed lawsuit, exposure to Suboxone oral film strips caused an Illinois man to suffer severe tooth decay that required extensive dental work.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)Judge Says Suboxone โSchedule Aโ Lawsuits Should Be Filed Individually or Dismissed (04/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Resulted in Severe Paralysis: Lawsuit (Posted: 3 days ago)A man who became paralyzed has filed an Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit after the original device failed, causing him to suffer electric shocks.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Eterna Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Resulted in Worsening Pain (05/13/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges SCS Lead Failure Caused Nerve Damage (05/06/2026)Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (04/29/2026)