Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Cartiva Implant Recall Issued by Stryker Due to Rising Rates of Big Toe Joint Failure Manufacturer’s decision to recall Cartiva big toe implants comes as a number of patients pursue lawsuits alleging the device was defectively designed and prone to failure. November 27, 2024 Russell Maas Add Your Comments Although the Cartiva implant has been widely advertised as a superior alternative to big toe fusion surgery, with the manufacturers claiming patients face a low risk of complications, a massive recall has now been issued for all lots of the synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) sold since July 2016, due to a “higher-than-expected” rate of failure, often resulting in the need for removal or revision surgery. The Cartiva SCI is a molded cylindrical implant made of polyvinyl alcohol-based hydrogel (PVA), which has been promoted as an alternative to fusion surgery for treating hallux limitus or hallux rigidus, which are forms of degenerative arthritis in the big toe’s first joint. Although the FDA approved the Cartiva implant in 2016 based on clinical trials showing a 13% failure rate, concerns have emerged in recent years about significantly higher Cartiva failure rates, with a number of individuals now pursuing product liability lawsuits against Stryker, alleging that they manufactured and sold an unreasonably defective and dangerous product. The Cartiva implant lawsuits outline reports of users experiencing severe complications, including severe toe pain, loosening, fractures and other issues. Often, these complications necessitate surgery to fuse the big toe, resulting in a loss of mobility. Cartiva Lawsuit Did you or a loved one receive a Cartiva Toe Implant? Lawyers are reviewing Cartiva lawsuits for individuals who experienced complications after receiving the toe implant. Settlement benefits may be available. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Cartiva Lawsuit Did you or a loved one receive a Cartiva Toe Implant? Lawyers are reviewing Cartiva lawsuits for individuals who experienced complications after receiving the toe implant. Settlement benefits may be available. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Lawsuits over the Cartiva implant have pointed to a growing body of medical research and case reports published in recent years, which challenged Stryker’s claimed 13% Cartiva failure rate, with some findings suggesting that 79% of Cartiva implants fail within two years. Earlier this month, a new study was released, which indicated that Cartiva implant patients faced a 30 times higher rate of reoperation than those who received alternative procedures, which was expected to provide important new evidence in the litigation. Cartiva Implant Recall Issued by Stryker In response to the growing evidence, Stryker quietly issued a Cartiva implant recall (PDF) late last month, calling for the return of all existing devices, so that it can provide updated postmarket safety information for patients and medical providers. According to a medical device recall notice sent to surgeons and hospital risk managers on October 31, 2024, Stryker decided to recall Cartiva implants in response to this newly published data and postmarket reports revealing that patients with Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implants (SCI) are experiencing higher-than-expected rates of complications compared to the figures presented in the 2016 Premarket Approval (PMA). These complications include the need for revision or removal of the implant, subsidence, displacement, persistent pain, nerve damage and fragmentation. In several cases, Stryker indicates Cartiva SCI devices have required revision or removal at rates that surpass those observed in the initial premarket and post-approval studies. The recall includes all lots of Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant (SCI) that were sold from July 2016 through October 2024, including 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm and 12 mm sizes, with the following catalog and primary device identifier (PDI) numbers: CAR-06-US (6mm) – PDI 00852897002328 CAR-08-US (8mm) – PDI 00852897002021 CAR-10-US (10mm) – PDI 00852897002038 CAR-12-US (12mm) – PDI 00852897002335 Medical facilities are being instructed to review their internal inventories to identify the recalled Cartiva products. Once identified, these devices must be removed from their points of use and either isolated or quarantined to prevent further use. All affected implants available at the facility should be returned to: Product Field Action Product Return ATTN: Return PFAA 3775099/PFAE 3794726 Memphis-Arlington Rd Arlington, TN 38002 As part of the recall, healthcare providers and physicians are instructed to continue monitoring patients who have received the affected Cartiva implants for any new or worsening symptoms. These symptoms may include pain, difficulty walking, skin reactions, stiffness, swelling or weakness in the big toe joint. If users experience adverse reactions or encounter quality issues with the Cartiva implant, they are encouraged to report these incidents promptly to Stryker’s Trauma & Extremities division complaint department via email and the FDA MedWatch Serious Injury Reporting Program. Cartiva Implant Failure Lawyers Lawyers are continuing to investigate new Cartiva implant lawsuits for individuals who have suffered injuries or required additional surgery that could have been avoided if warnings about the rate of Cartiva failures had been disclosed in a timely manner. Financial compensation may be available through a Cartiva implant failure lawsuit settlement for individuals who received the big toe implant and experienced any of the following complications: Implant Failure/Fracture Subsidence (implant sinks into the bone) Toe Fusion Surgery Replacement Surgery Revision Surgery All claims are being pursued by Cartiva implant lawyers on a contingency fee basis, which means that there are no fees or expenses paid unless a Cartiva settlement or lawsuit payout is received. Written by: Russell Maas Managing Editor & Senior Legal Journalist Russell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nation’s leading personal injury law firms and oversees the site’s editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Big Toe Fusion, Cartiva Failure Rates, Cartiva Implant Lawsuit, Cartiva Implant Recall, Stryker Image Credit: Shutterstock: Sundry Photography Find Out If You Qualify for Cartiva Failure Compensation More Cartiva Lawsuit Stories Lawsuit Claims Cartiva SCI Failure Caused by Defective Design of Big Toe Implant September 18, 2025 Cartiva Lawyers Select Settlement Mediator in Toe Implant Lawsuit September 12, 2025 Lawsuit Claims Cartiva Implant Caused Bone Loss and Nerve Damage in Big Toe August 12, 2025 0 Comments PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Breast Mesh Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Highlighting Internal Bra Complications (Posted: today) Breast mesh implants promoted as internal bras are now under scrutiny, following studies and FDA warnings linking the devices to infections, implant loss, and surgical failure. Lawsuits are being investigated for women who suffered complications after reconstruction or augmentation procedures involving products like GalaFLEX, Phasix, Strattice, and AlloDerm. MORE ABOUT: BREAST MESH LAWSUIT Dupixent Cancer Risks Outlined in User Stories, as Evidence Mounts of T-Cell Lymphoma Link (Posted: yesterday) Dupixent users are coming forward with accounts of devastating cancer diagnoses, saying the popular eczema drug masked early warning signs of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. As the FDA investigates and the first lawsuit is filed, researchers warn Dupixent may unmask or accelerate hidden cancers, raising urgent questions about its long-term safety. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over T-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis (10/02/2025)Dupixent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Warning Label Update Being Evaluated by FDA (09/15/2025)Dupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (09/04/2025) Lawsuits Over Vision Loss From Ozempic, Mounjaro Should Be Sent to New MDL Judge, Plaintiffs Argue (Posted: 2 days ago) Plaintiffs involved in GLP-1 vision loss lawsuits are calling for the litigation to be consolidated in New Jersey federal court, and not be bundled with existing stomach paralysis litigation. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITReports of ‘Ozempic Teeth’ Raise Concerns Over Dry Mouth Side Effects Linked to GLP-1s (10/03/2025)Study Raises New Questions Over Ozempic Hair Loss Risks (09/26/2025)Mounjaro Side Effects Led to Emergency Surgery, Lawsuit Alleges (09/24/2025)
Breast Mesh Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Highlighting Internal Bra Complications (Posted: today) Breast mesh implants promoted as internal bras are now under scrutiny, following studies and FDA warnings linking the devices to infections, implant loss, and surgical failure. Lawsuits are being investigated for women who suffered complications after reconstruction or augmentation procedures involving products like GalaFLEX, Phasix, Strattice, and AlloDerm. MORE ABOUT: BREAST MESH LAWSUIT
Dupixent Cancer Risks Outlined in User Stories, as Evidence Mounts of T-Cell Lymphoma Link (Posted: yesterday) Dupixent users are coming forward with accounts of devastating cancer diagnoses, saying the popular eczema drug masked early warning signs of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. As the FDA investigates and the first lawsuit is filed, researchers warn Dupixent may unmask or accelerate hidden cancers, raising urgent questions about its long-term safety. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over T-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis (10/02/2025)Dupixent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Warning Label Update Being Evaluated by FDA (09/15/2025)Dupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (09/04/2025)
Lawsuits Over Vision Loss From Ozempic, Mounjaro Should Be Sent to New MDL Judge, Plaintiffs Argue (Posted: 2 days ago) Plaintiffs involved in GLP-1 vision loss lawsuits are calling for the litigation to be consolidated in New Jersey federal court, and not be bundled with existing stomach paralysis litigation. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITReports of ‘Ozempic Teeth’ Raise Concerns Over Dry Mouth Side Effects Linked to GLP-1s (10/03/2025)Study Raises New Questions Over Ozempic Hair Loss Risks (09/26/2025)Mounjaro Side Effects Led to Emergency Surgery, Lawsuit Alleges (09/24/2025)