Why was Celsius Energy Drink recalled?

Celsius Energy Drink was recalled because some cans were mistakenly filled with vodka seltzer and labeled incorrectly, raising the risk of unintentional alcohol consumption.

Which product was involved in the mislabeled Celsius recall?

The recall affects two production lots of High Noon Beach Variety Packs, which may contain vodka seltzer in cans mislabeled as Celsius Astro Vibe Energy Drink, Sparkling Blue Razz Edition.

What are the risks of consuming mislabeled Celsius cans?

Consumers may unknowingly ingest alcohol, leading to health risks such as allergic reactions, alcohol poisoning, or injury, especially for minors or individuals avoiding alcohol.

What are the lot codes for the recalled Celsius cans?

The affected Celsius cans have lot codes from L CCB 02JL25 2:55 to L CCB 02JL25 3:11 lasered on the bottom of the can.

Celsius Energy Drink Recall Issued After Cans Were Inadvertently Filled With Vodka Seltzer

Q: Where were the recalled products shipped?

The mislabeled High Noon packs were shipped to retailers in Florida, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin between July 21 and July 23, 2025.

High Noon is recalling certain packs of seltzers due to mislabeling, which may cause unintended alcohol consumption.

Celsius Energy Drink Recall Issued After Cans Were Inadvertently Filled With Vodka Seltzer

July 31, 2025

Darian Hauf

Add Your Comments

A recall has been issued for two production lots of High Noon Beach Variety Packs after it was discovered that some alcoholic seltzer cans were mistakenly labeled as Celsius energy drinks, potentially putting consumers at risk of unknowingly ingesting alcohol.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the High Noon-Celsius recall on July 30, after the manufacturer determined that a shared packaging supplier had accidentally shipped empty Celsius energy drink cans to its facility, which were then filled with vodka-based seltzer and distributed in 12-pack Beach Variety Packs.

Celsius is marketed as a stimulant energy drink with no alcohol content, while High Noon is an alcoholic ready-to-drink cocktail.

The mislabeling raises serious health concerns, particularly for minors, individuals with medical conditions, or those who must avoid alcohol, as it could lead to unintentional alcohol ingestion, allergic reactions, alcohol poisoning or accidental injury.

Do You Know about…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More

SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

Do You Know About…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More

SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

High Noon is recalling two production lots of its Beach Variety packs (12-pack, 12 fluid ounce cans) that may contain cans mislabeled as Celsius Astro Vibe Energy Drink, Sparkling Blue Razz Edition, with a silver top. The affected Celsius cans have lot codes L CCB 02JL25 2:55 to L CCB 02JL25 3:11 lasered on the bottom.

According to the FDA, the recalled packs were shipped between July 21 and July 23, 2025, to retailers in Florida, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Virginia and Wisconsin. No illnesses or injuries have been reported to date.

Even if consumers did not purchase a High Noon Beach Variety Pack, they are urged to check any Celsius Astro Vibe cans for the affected lot codes and dispose of them immediately if found, as the contents may contain alcohol despite the energy drink label.

Customers who have purchased the affected packs or mislabeled Celsius cans should contact High Noon Consumer Relations at consumerrelations@highnoonvodka.com for more information on next steps, including refunds.

Sign up for more recall and legal news that could affect you or your family.

Image Credit: FDA

Written By: Darian Hauf

Consumer Safety & Recall News Writer

Darian Hauf is a consumer safety writer at AboutLawsuits.com, where she covers product recalls, public health alerts, and regulatory updates from agencies like the FDA and CPSC. She contributes research and reporting support on emerging safety concerns affecting households and consumers nationwide.

0 Comments

Name

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

First Name*

Last Name

Email*

Shared Comments*

This field is hidden when viewing the form

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page

Yes

Post Comment

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page

Weekly Digest Opt-In

Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

Contact Phone #

Alt Phone #

Private Comments

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

CAPTCHA

GA Source

GA Campaign

GA Medium

GA Content

GA Term

MORE TOP STORIES

Judge Says Suboxone ‘Schedule A’ Lawsuits Should Be Filed Individually or Dismissed

(Posted: today)

Two years after allowing thousands of incomplete Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits to be submitted due to statutes of limitation laws, a federal judge says those cases should be filed individually or dismissed.

MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUIT

JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28

(Posted: 3 days ago)

In late May, a panel of federal judges will hold oral arguments over whether all federal spinal cord stimulator lawsuits should be consolidated before one judge for pretrial proceedings.

MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUIT

Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death

(Posted: 4 days ago)

As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumer’s death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.

MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUIT