Chrysler Pacifica Lawsuits Allege Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) May Explode and Catch Fire

Plaintiffs are pushing for the Chrysler Pacifica lawsuits to be consolidated and centralized before one federal judge for pretrial proceedings.

A series of Chrysler Pacifica class action lawsuits are being pursued for owners of the recalled minivans, alleging that the vehicles pose a significant risk of exploding or catching fire. Yet the manufacturer has yet to provide a remedy or fix, nearly two years after initiating a recall.

To date, at least seven Fiat Chrysler Pacifica lawsuits have been filed on behalf of 46 plaintiffs, which are currently pending across four different U.S. District Courts, each raising similar allegations that the Plug-in Hybrid Electric minivans pose an unreasonable risk of fires and explosions.

Fiat Chrysler issued a Pacifica minivan recall on June 11, 2020, impacting at least 27,634 hybrid minivans from the model years 2017 to 2020.

At the time of the recall, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHSA) had received at least 12 reports of the Chrylser Pacifica fires linked to an electrical post on the 12-volt battery developing high resistance and overheating.

The recall notice indicated that these overheating events may occur while the plug-in hybrid electric minivans are on or off. As a result, vehicle owners have been instructed to park the vehicles outdoors, away from other vehicles and structures, and to not allow moisture of any kind to get on the floor of the second row seating where the post is located, as this could increase the risk of a fire. In particular, the company warned customers to keep wet items out of the back seat such as beverages, umbrellas, or bottled liquids that could leak and make contact with the post.

Nearly two years after owners of the minivans were told about these problems, they are still unable to safely charge the minivans or park the vehicle inside their garages. While awaiting a Chrysler Pacifica recall repair to be released by the auto maker, owners are left without the ability to fully use the hybrid-electric features they paid for, according to the lawsuits.

The recalled minivans are a hybrid vehicle, consisting of both an internal combustion engine with a battery and electric motor. However, due to the increased battery fire risks, owners cannot charge the battery to power the electric motor.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

As a result of the unresolved battery problems, a growing number of owners and lessees have filed lawsuits against Fiat Chrysler claiming they have are not able to use the hybrid features that were advertised, unable to park their vehicle in garages or near structures, and that the vehicles have lost significant value due to the unresolved defect.

On May 9, one of the plaintiff’s, Scott Olsen, filed a motion filed a motion to transfer (PDF) with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), calling for all of the Chrysler Pacifica lawsuits filed throughout the federal court system to be consolidated for pretrial proceedings in either the Northern District of California before the U.S. District Judge Edward J. Davila for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings, or to the Central District of California before the District Judge Cormac J. Carney.

“As suggested by the nature of the allegations and the size of the putative class, the Related Actions will involve complex and voluminous electronic discovery,” the motion states. “Should the cases remain in separate districts, there will inevitably be duplicative motions, depositions, and production of documents.”

Known as an MDL, or multidistrict litigation, such centralization is common in complex product liability litigation, where a large number of claims are being filed in courts nationwide over the similar damages caused by the same product defects.

Coordinating the cases before one judge is intended to reduce duplicative discovery into common issues, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings and serve the convenience of common witnesses, parties and the judicial system.

5 Comments

  • DARLASeptember 14, 2022 at 3:22 pm

    speaking of cracked windshields mine is the same way and sadly its around 1000.00 to replace and calobrate them, Wished I have never got mine! another thing that I wished I had never gotten it is when I went to get my tag here in Oklahoma it doubled in price d/t the fine higher ups in Oklahoma decided that depending on size and weight of your hybrid that will be the price of your tag .. for what?[Show More]speaking of cracked windshields mine is the same way and sadly its around 1000.00 to replace and calobrate them, Wished I have never got mine! another thing that I wished I had never gotten it is when I went to get my tag here in Oklahoma it doubled in price d/t the fine higher ups in Oklahoma decided that depending on size and weight of your hybrid that will be the price of your tag .. for what? well when asked it is suppose to pay for the fixing of the roads here in Oklahoma and to this day or beat up and not fixed and to pay for the charging stations the two we have here in my town do not work but that hey that's what my tag doubling in price is paying for.

  • DavidSeptember 13, 2022 at 5:27 pm

    We have 2018 model and have received the recall telling us not to charge it, park it in our garage, or near our house. I want it fixed or replaced.

  • CraigSeptember 12, 2022 at 8:40 pm

    I have one and have not been able to get appropriate restitution from Chrysler. The severe recall restrictions are now 7 months old while no solution in sight.

  • CharleneAugust 11, 2022 at 10:33 am

    I would like to join in one of these lawsuits. How do I do that?

  • ChristinaJuly 29, 2022 at 10:16 am

    I’m not having problems with my battery but I’m having problems with my windshield cracking all the time. Having to replace The windshield for the second time in two months.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status Conference To Be Held With MDL Judge This Week
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status Conference To Be Held With MDL Judge This Week (Posted 2 days ago)

U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal hair relaxer lawsuits will meet with lawyers involved in the litigation on Thursday, to discuss the status of the claims and when to move forward with bellwether cases.

Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025
Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025 (Posted 3 days ago)

A series of four bellwether claims in the baby formula NEC lawsuit MDL will be ready to go before a federal juries in May 2025, August 2025, November 2025 and February 2026 according to a proposed trial schedule agreed upon by both plaintiffs and defendants.