Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
NHTSA Hits Fiat Chrysler With $105M In Fines Over Auto Recall Failures July 27, 2015 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsFiat Chrysler Automobiles must pay a $105 million fine, the largest ever levied against an auto manufacturer, for failure to perform timely recalls and to notify regulators and consumers about defective vehicles.ย The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced the civil penalties on July 26. In addition to the monetary fines, the company, more commonly known as Chrysler, must also submit to additional federal oversight and agree to buy back some defective vehicles from owners.The fines and penalties were detailed in a consent order (PDF) dated July 24, which came after a July 2 public hearing covering problems the NHTSA found with 23 Chrysler recalls that affected more than 11 million vehicles.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION“Today’s action holds Fiat Chrysler accountable for its past failures, pushes them to get unsafe vehicles repaired or off the roads and takes concrete steps to keep Americans safer going forward,” Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a press release. “This civil penalty puts manufacturers on notice that the Department will act when they do not take their obligations to repair safety defects seriously.”The consent order requires Chrysler to pay a $70 million cash penalty, and to spend at least $20 million meeting performance requirements. In addition, the company may have to pay another $15 million if an independent monitor discovers more safety violations.The company will also have to inform owners of more than half a million vehicles with potentially defective suspension parts, which could cause the driver to lose control, that they can sell their vehicle back to Fiat Chrysler. It must also give another million Jeep owners the opportunity to trade in their vehicles for above market value or give them a financial incentive to repair fuel tanks that could burst into flames.Chrysler Recall ProblemsThe July 2nd hearing over the Chrysler problems involved a review of 23 different recalls where there was evidence that the company failed to adequately address safety problems.Included in that list is a Jeep Grand Cherokee and Jeep Liberty rear fuel tank recall, which has been linkedย to at least 51 deaths due to the fuel tanks unprotected rear placement. The NHTSA reports at least 51 people have been killed in fiery crashes that included Chryslers 1993 to 1998 model years Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2002 to 2007 model years Jeep Liberty that have pose a fire hazard when rear-ended.Despite the reported deaths associated with the rear end accidents causing the vehicles gas tank to crack and engulf the vehicle in flames, Chrysler denied NHTSA claims that a safety defect existed and refused to recall the vehicles. Even after Chrysler agreed to recall 1.5 million of the potentially affected 2.6 million vehicles, four months passed before the recall was actually initiated and announced. Many of these vehicles are still not repaired due to Chryslerโs inability to provide necessary repair parts.An additional recall concern is the nearly 1.6 million Chrysler vehicles that were impacted by an ignition interlock safety hazard, similar to the General Motors recall that impacted 6 million vehicles. According to the NHTSA, certain Chrysler vehicles experienced defective ignition interlock systems that can get knocked out of the run position, putting the driver in an increased crash situation with no air bags.Other recalls evaluated at the hearing included steering control failures, alternator failures, rear axle defects, and multiple air bag failure recalls all issued since 2013.“Fiat Chrysler’s pattern of poor performance put millions of its customers, and the driving public, at risk,” NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind said in the press release. “This action will provide relief to owners of defective vehicles, will help improve recall performance throughout the auto industry, and gives Fiat Chrysler the opportunity to embrace a proactive safety culture.” Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Auto Recall, Chrysler, Jeep Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-365671p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">FotograFFF</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a>More Lawsuit Stories Fourth Bard PowerPort Bellwether Case Set for Trial Dec. 1, as Third Gets Underway October 14, 2026 Lawsuit Alleges Apple AirTag Tracker Used to Monitor Womanโs Location October 14, 2026 Heart Valve Lawsuit Alleges Abbott Trifecta GT Failed Years Earlier Than Expected October 14, 2026 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Fourth Bard PowerPort Bellwether Case Set for Trial Dec. 1, as Third Gets Underway (Posted: today)A federal judge has scheduled a fourth Bard PowerPort bellwether trial to begin on December 1, while the third trial is slated to begin on October 13.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJudge Clears Bard PowerPort Lawsuit for Trial, Rejecting Motion for Summary Judgment (10/02/2026)Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (09/14/2026)Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (09/09/2026) GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Man to Become Legally Blind (Posted: yesterday)A Florida manโs lawsuit claims he became legally blind after developing NAION while using the diabetes drug Ozempic.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic Injection Lawsuit Claims Diabetes Medication Caused Vision Loss (09/22/2026)Lawsuit Blames Mounjaro, Ozempic Side Effects for Vision Loss (09/15/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (09/08/2026) Master Complaint for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Filed (Posted: 2 days ago)Boston Scientific SCS implant litigation is moving toward a process that will speed up future lawsuit filings as the number of claims continues to rise.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (10/05/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)Nevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)
Fourth Bard PowerPort Bellwether Case Set for Trial Dec. 1, as Third Gets Underway (Posted: today)A federal judge has scheduled a fourth Bard PowerPort bellwether trial to begin on December 1, while the third trial is slated to begin on October 13.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJudge Clears Bard PowerPort Lawsuit for Trial, Rejecting Motion for Summary Judgment (10/02/2026)Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (09/14/2026)Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (09/09/2026)
GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Man to Become Legally Blind (Posted: yesterday)A Florida manโs lawsuit claims he became legally blind after developing NAION while using the diabetes drug Ozempic.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic Injection Lawsuit Claims Diabetes Medication Caused Vision Loss (09/22/2026)Lawsuit Blames Mounjaro, Ozempic Side Effects for Vision Loss (09/15/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (09/08/2026)
Master Complaint for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Filed (Posted: 2 days ago)Boston Scientific SCS implant litigation is moving toward a process that will speed up future lawsuit filings as the number of claims continues to rise.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (10/05/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)Nevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)