Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Toy Magnetic Ball Injury Risk Should Result in Ban from U.S.: Experts October 23, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A recent panel of experts was convened to review the dangers of small toy magnetic balls, and many have called for a complete ban on the office desk toys due to the serious risks they pose for children. ย The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) held a hearing on October 22 to review toy magnet set safety standards, as the organization considers a new rule that would ban some of them from the U.S. A number of medical experts testified at the hearing, but the founder of one of the most successful brands complained that the industry had not been notified of the event. Do You Know aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The public hearing came after years of the CPSC battling to get better label warnings on the toy magnet sets, and, when that appeared to fail at preventing injuries, fighting to have them removed from the market entirely.ย The CPSC was forced to file rare administrative complaints against a number of manufacturers in July 2012, seeking to force theย recall of BuckyBallsย andย Zen Magnets. The proposed rule (PDF) would prohibit toy magnet sets that have more than one magnet that fits within the CPSC’s small parts cylinder, used for determining whether a part is small enough to be swallowed by a child, and if the magnets from the set had a flux index (a measure of magnet strength) of 50 or more. Magnet toy sets have been linked with a number of serious and potentially life threatening injuries for children and young adults in recent years, occurring after one or more of the small balls are accidentally swallowed. This often has been reported among infants, toddlers and teens attempting to simulate tongue or cheek piercings. If more than one of the powerful magnets are swallowed, they often attract to each other while moving through the intestines. This may cause intestines to twist, create blockages or tear intestinal walls. Often this results in the need for emergency surgery and can result in death or severe life-long health problems for the child. Initial symptoms associated with swallowing the small magnets may be similar to that of a common flu consisting of vomiting, diarrhea, and stomach pain, causing the problems not to be promptly recognized until certain medical examinations are done, further delaying treatment and allowing the magnets to attract. Experts Testify in Support of Toy Magnet Ban “These products already include warnings to keep the product away from children, that serious injury or death may occur, and that the products are only intended for those 14 and older,” testified Ami Gadhia, senior policy counsel for the Consumers Union, known mostly for its Consumer Reports publications. “However, despite the existence of these warnings as of 2010, the reports of injuries from ingestion of these products continued.” The Consumers Union was joined in support of the rule by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). “The AAP fully supports this proposed rule because it will address a well-documented threat to child health,” testified Mark A. Gilger, MD, on behalf of the AAP. “Warning labels area less effective injury prevention method than changing a product to reduce the hazard, and would be particularly ineffective in this instance because children six and younger represent the bulk of incidents associated with this product.” However, Tim Szeto, founder of Nano Magnetics, Ltd. sent an e-mail to the CPSC protesting the hearing. Szeto said the CPSC failed to properly notify interested stakeholders and that the information about the hearing was not widely disseminated on the agency’s website, twitterfeed or through direct communication with businesspeople who would be affected. He called for a proper announcement and an extension of the oral comment period to allow other interested parties to put their input in writing to the CPSC. “I’d like to state for the record that these parties had not been made aware of the opportunity for oral presentation of comment taking place on October 22nd, 2013, and thereby cannot be in attendance,” he wrote. “These parties however did wish to attend, and are indeed considered to be interested parties with substantive comments.” The notice of opportunity for oral presentation of comments posted on the CPSC website is dated September 24. An estimated 3 million of the magnet sets have been sold in the U.S. since 2010. Despite the regulatory efforts to place strong warning labels on the products and launch an educational campaign for consumers, reports of continuing injuries led the safety regulators to determine that the manufacture and sale of the powerful toy magnets should be banned. Consumers have been urged to immediately stop using any magnet ball sets and to make certain that they are kept out of reach of children. In addition, safety officials indicate that consumers should teach children of all ages about the risks posed by magnets or items containing magnets, urging them to never place any in their mouth or nose and to seek immediate medical attention for any child who is suspected of swallowing one or more magnets. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Buckyballs, Children, Childrens Toy, Magnets Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations February 27, 2026 Cook Celect IVC Filter Lawsuit Alleges Device Fractured Into Patientโs Vein February 27, 2026 Apple Watch Lawsuit Claims Device Caused Second-Degree Burn to Womanโs Wrist February 27, 2026 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (Posted: 2 days ago) An Illinois man alleges he was implanted with a defectively designed Medtronic spinal cord stimulator that was later adjusted by company sales representatives who were not medically trained. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)MDL Sought for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Abbott, Boston Scientific (02/23/2026)Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit Filed Over Problems With WaveWriter Alpha System (02/16/2026) Long-Term Side Effects of Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma and Hearing Loss, Lawsuit Says (Posted: 3 days ago) A Pennsylvania woman says she suffered hearing loss and other long-term Depo-Provera side effects after receiving the birth control injections for nearly 20 years. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Brain Tumor Risks Make Birth Control Shot Unreasonably Dangerous: Lawsuit (02/20/2026)Pfizer Indicates Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits Should Be Preempted by Federal Law (02/03/2026)Proposed Depo-Provera Lawsuit Schedule Calls for First Trial in Dec. 2026 (01/23/2026) Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has put in place additional procedures to address the deaths of women suffering from cancer who are pursuing hair relaxer lawsuits, allowing estates and families to take up their claims. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (01/28/2026)
Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations February 27, 2026
Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (Posted: 2 days ago) An Illinois man alleges he was implanted with a defectively designed Medtronic spinal cord stimulator that was later adjusted by company sales representatives who were not medically trained. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)MDL Sought for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Abbott, Boston Scientific (02/23/2026)Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit Filed Over Problems With WaveWriter Alpha System (02/16/2026)
Long-Term Side Effects of Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma and Hearing Loss, Lawsuit Says (Posted: 3 days ago) A Pennsylvania woman says she suffered hearing loss and other long-term Depo-Provera side effects after receiving the birth control injections for nearly 20 years. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Brain Tumor Risks Make Birth Control Shot Unreasonably Dangerous: Lawsuit (02/20/2026)Pfizer Indicates Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits Should Be Preempted by Federal Law (02/03/2026)Proposed Depo-Provera Lawsuit Schedule Calls for First Trial in Dec. 2026 (01/23/2026)
Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has put in place additional procedures to address the deaths of women suffering from cancer who are pursuing hair relaxer lawsuits, allowing estates and families to take up their claims. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (01/28/2026)