CPSC Approves New Rules Governing Mandatory Recalls

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has voted to approve new rules that will set the guidelines for information required in the case of mandatory recalls for defective products.

Virtually all recalls announced by the CPSC are voluntarily done with the cooperation of the manufacturer or distributor. In 2009, every recall was voluntary. However, the CPSC announced new rules on Monday regarding forced, mandatory recalls where the manufacturer is unwilling or unable to be a part of a voluntary recall effort.

The new rule requires the mandatory recalls to include product descriptions, actions being taken, the number of units being recalled, identification of the hazard and the reason for the action, number and description of injuries or deaths, as well as the ages of those injured or killed, dates when the product was manufactured and sold as well as remedies available for customers. The rules do not affect voluntary recalls, however the CPSC announcement says that the mandatory rules should be used as a guide for voluntary recalls.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

The mandatory recall rules were added to the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) as an amendment by President Barack Obama when he was still a member of the Senate. The CPSIA governs how the CPSC operates. The CPSC’s duty is to protect the public from unreasonable risks from consumer products.

The CPSC, which approved the new rules unanimously, said that the rules will help consumers easily identify recalled products, understand the threats associated with those products and understand what remedies are available. The rules will go into effect upon publication in the Federal Register.


"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer
Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer "Representative" (Posted 2 days ago)

Bard claims two cases selected for the third and fourth bellwether trials are no longer representative of the litigation due to the plaintiffs' worsening injuries and need for additional surgeries due to their failed hernia mesh products.