Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
CPSC Approves New Safety Rules for Infant Cushions and Pillows New rules come after more than 200 children have been injured or died as a result of infant support cushions since 2010. October 17, 2024 Darian Hauf Add Your Comments Federal safety regulators have approved a series of new mandatory standards for infant cushions and pillow products, which are intended to address the rising number of preventable injuries and deaths associated with their use in recent years. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the new Federal Safety Standard for Infant Support Cushions on October 16, following a 5-0 vote to approve new rules that will address product design flaws that can increase the risk of suffocation, entrapment and fall risks. Infant support cushions are designed to provide comfort and support for babies in various positions, whether lying down, sitting up or resting. These products include a range of items, such as: Infant loungers Infant head positioner pillows Infant wedge pillows Infant sleep positioners and anti-rollover pillows Crib pillows Stuffed toys, pads or mats marketed for use as infant support cushions Multi-purpose pillows for nursing and lounging Tummy time pillows While infant cushion and pillow products have become widely popular among parents across the U.S., the CPSC has become aware of at least 79 infant deaths and 124 injuries associated with infant support cushions, which occurred between 2010 and 2022. Most incidents have involved children younger than three months old, with the majority of these deaths involving the cushions being used on beds, mattresses, bassinets, cribs, play yards, couches or futons. Do You Know about… Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The new rule goes into effect 180 days after its publication in the Federal Register and mandates the following infant support cushion standards: Firmness testing on all parts of the productsโ surfaces to reduce suffocation from the cushions conforming to an infantโs face and obstructing airways. Sidewall angle testing that would require the angle formed between any sidewall and the cushionโs surface to be greater than 90 degrees to reduce the risk of entrapment and suffocation. The maximum incline angle of the products cannot exceed 10 degrees to minimize hazardous positioning of an infantโs head and neck. This ruling also limits the side height and provides consumers with a visual cue to place the product on the floor, reducing the risk of falls. Prohibition on the use of infant restraints, as they can give the misleading impression that an infant can be safely left unattended in the product. Products must feature conspicuous, permanent warning labels with strong wording. CPSC warns that infants can fall out of support cushions without warning, and urges parents or caregivers to always watch their children during use, and never use infant support cushions for sleeping. Infant support cushions should only be used on the floor and away from blankets or soft items. Federal safety officials remind parents and guardians that the safest place for a baby to sleep is on a flat, bare surface, such as a crib, bassinet or play yard. Inclined Infant Sleep Products Linked to Suffocation Risks Suffocation risks have been linked to a number of popular infant products in recent years, with many of the fatalities occurring in products with inclined designs, such as rockers, gliders, soothers and swings. In early April 2019, the CPSC first raised concerns over the inclining design of Fisher-Price Rock โn Play infant sleepers, warning consumers to stop placing infants in the sleepers before they begin to show signs that they can roll over independently. Officials warned that infants may have the ability to roll over on their stomach and become trapped against the inclined bed, creating a suffocation risk. Shortly after the initial CPSC warning, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued a statement, calling for the commission to issue an immediate recall for the Rock โn Play Sleepers. The AAP determined the inclined sleepers were unsafe, and that the CPSC warning did not go far enough to ensure the safety of infants. Just 12 days after the warning, the agency issued a Fisher-Price Rock โn Play Sleeper recall, impacting approximately 4.7 million units. The recall included all models of Rock โn Play sleepers that were distributed for sale throughout the United States to major retailers for between $40 and $149 since 2009. Since the recalls, Fisher-Price has been hit with a number of inclined sleeper individual wrongful death lawsuits and at least 10 class action lawsuits alleging the manufacturer knew or should have known about the risk of problems, yet delayed announcing a recall or warning, and knowingly allowed parents to continue purchasing life-threatening sleeper devices. Another Fisher-Price recall was announced earlier this month, impacting roughly 2.1 million Snuga Swings, following at least five reports of infant suffocation deaths when the product was used for sleep, or additional bedding material was added to the swings. The CPSC issued a series of warnings in August 2024 for these kinds of products, due to faulty designs that caused multiple infant deaths. Design flaws for the products included low sides that failed to contain infants, overly thick sleeping pads that posed suffocation risks, entrapment risks between the seat and bars of a stroller or in enclosed openings, and restraint systems that excessively restricted infant movement. The new federal safety standards approved by the CPSC this week address many of the hazards associated with these products and could prevent future infant injuries and deaths. Written by: Darian Hauf Consumer Safety & Recall News Writer Darian Hauf is a consumer safety writer at AboutLawsuits.com, where she covers product recalls, public health alerts, and regulatory updates from agencies like the FDA and CPSC. She contributes research and reporting support on emerging safety concerns affecting households and consumers nationwide. Tags: CPSC, Infant Cushion, Infant Cushion Rules, Infant Pillow More Lawsuit Stories Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain April 3, 2026 Lawsuit Claims Covidien Hernia Mesh Perforated Manโs Bowel April 3, 2026 Judge Upholds $9M Crock-Pot Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Verdict April 3, 2026 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (Posted: today) An Illinois woman has joined a growing number of plaintiffs alleging that the Medtronic Intellis neurostimulator, and similar devices, may fail to relieve chronic pain and instead lead to worsening complications. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026) Court Outlines Plan To Prepare Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits for Trial in Early 2028 (Posted: yesterday) Four Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits will eventually be selected and prepared for bellwether trials set to begin in March 2028, according to a court order. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Film Lawsuit Filed by 46 Users Alleging Drug Makers Ignored Years of Dental Injury Reports (03/03/2026)100 Suboxone Film Tooth Decay Lawsuits Selected for Next Phase of Bellwether Discovery (02/13/2026)Problems With Suboxone Dental Injury Records Collection Continues in MDL (01/26/2026) Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge is being asked to certify seven hair relaxer class action lawsuits seeking medical monitoring for users, following studies that link the products to an increased risk of cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)
Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (Posted: today) An Illinois woman has joined a growing number of plaintiffs alleging that the Medtronic Intellis neurostimulator, and similar devices, may fail to relieve chronic pain and instead lead to worsening complications. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026)
Court Outlines Plan To Prepare Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits for Trial in Early 2028 (Posted: yesterday) Four Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits will eventually be selected and prepared for bellwether trials set to begin in March 2028, according to a court order. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Film Lawsuit Filed by 46 Users Alleging Drug Makers Ignored Years of Dental Injury Reports (03/03/2026)100 Suboxone Film Tooth Decay Lawsuits Selected for Next Phase of Bellwether Discovery (02/13/2026)Problems With Suboxone Dental Injury Records Collection Continues in MDL (01/26/2026)
Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge is being asked to certify seven hair relaxer class action lawsuits seeking medical monitoring for users, following studies that link the products to an increased risk of cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)