Skip Navigation

Crest Toothpaste Contains Harsh Mouth-Damaging Chemicals: Lawsuit

Crest Toothpaste Contains Harsh Mouth-Damaging Chemicals: Lawsuit

Two California residents have filed a class action lawsuit alleging Crest Pro-Health toothpaste caused pain and discomfort to their teeth and mouth because it contains sodium laurel sulfate, an ingredient they argue is not safe for human health.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Sherrie Oliver and Michael Testone in the U.S. Southern District Court of California on July 2, naming Crestโ€™s manufacturer, Procter & Gamble Co., as the defendant.

Sodium laurel sulfate (SLS) is a detergent and irritant often used in consumer cosmetic products. Research has shown it can damage the cells of the mouth, cause epithelial sloughing, disrupt the oral microbiome, cause allergic reactions, trigger inflammation and inhibit wound healing, even in low concentrations.

The lawsuit alleges SLS is a key ingredient of P&Gโ€™s Crest Pro-Health toothpaste and causes harm to oral health, which goes directly against marketing claims made by P&G about the product.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Crest Pro-Health Toothpaste Allegations

The lawsuit indicates Oliver began regularly purchasing Crest Pro-Health Gum Detoxify Plus in 2023 and continued to use it through 2025. She experienced pain, discomfort and sensitivity in her teeth and gums for an extended period of time.

Testone states he began purchasing Crest Pro-Health in 2018 and used it until February 2026. The lawsuit claims neither he nor Oliver were familiar with the SLS ingredient and would have purchased a different product if they had known about the side effects. As a result, the plaintiffs and members of the class encompassed by the lawsuit allegedly lost money because of P&Gโ€™s deceptive claims about the product.

P&G claims the Crest Pro-Health brand products deliver improved gum health and treat gingivitis. Marketing and product packaging includes claims like: โ€œGum protectionโ€ and โ€œPromotes healing and helps gums return to a healthier condition fast.โ€

Although marketing represents the products as healthy for the mouth and teeth, the complaint alleges P&G concealed facts about their products and deceptively omitted information about harm to human health. Oliver and Testone argue the company was in a position to know the truth about the dangers of SLS use in Crest. However, it failed to disclose that to consumers.

The complaint notes there were other viable toothpaste alternatives that did not contain SLS or other irritating properties. Instead, research indicates the more SLS used, the more damage can occur to mouth cells, which could lead to more canker sores and inhibit the healing process.

Plaintiffs argue that consumers reasonably expected the toothpaste to not contain ingredients that scientific research shows can be harmful, injure mouth cells and impair wound healing.

โ€œP&G is under a duty to disclose this information to consumers because (a) P&G is revealing some information about its productsโ€”enough to suggest they promote oral and gum healthโ€”without revealing additional material information, (b) P&Gโ€™s deceptive omissions concern human health, and specifically the detrimental health consequences of regularly using the Products, (c) P&G was in a superior position to know of the dangers presented by the SLS in its Products, and (d) P&G actively concealed material facts not known to Plaintiffs and other Class Members.โ€

Sherrie Oliver et al. v. The Procter & Gamble Co.

The lawsuit raises allegations of violations of the Unfair Competition law, violations of the False Advertising Law, violations of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, breach of express warranties and breach of implied warranty of merchantability.

Oliver and Testone are asking for the court to certify the class action, order P&G to bear the cost of the class notice, destroy misleading and deceptive advertising materials and product labels, recall all offending products, disgorge revenue and profits linked to unlawful practices and pay restitution and compensation for pain and suffering, punitive damages and attorneysโ€™ fees.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Martha Garcia
Written By: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.

About the writer

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.