Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Dangerous Drugs Often Get Past FDA Expedited Approval Process: Study August 7, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A new study by researchers from Harvard highlights the risk of unsafe drugs being allowed onto the market since the passage of an act that allowed pharmaceutical companies to pay a fee for expedited drug approvals, finding that the fast-track system has resulted in an increased number of drug recalls in recent years. The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) was enacted in 1992, allowing drug manufacturers to get their new medications on the market faster by paying a fee to speed up the regulatory review process. The law has led to a decrease in the average drug approval time from 34 months to 16 months, but may be resulting in large numbers of patients being exposed to dangerous drugs before side effects are recognized. In a study published in the August issue of the medical journal Health Affairs, Harvard researchers looked at drug approvals by the FDA over the last 35 years, finding that a greater rate of drugs recalls are being issued since the passage of PDUFA. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Between 1975 and 2009, the FDA approved 748 new molecular entities (NMEs) that were not over-the-counter drugs. Researchers found that 114 of them subsequently received black box warnings, and 32 were pulled from the market. Researchers also found that drugs approved after PDUFA was enacted were more likely to need a black box warning, the strongest label warning the FDA can require, after they were made available to the public. They also found that they were more likely to be pulled from the market for health reasons. According to the researchers, newer drugs are 35% more likely to get a black box warning or be withdrawn completely since the expedited process was put into place. One well-known example was Merck’s nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) Vioxx, which was recalled in 2004, just five years after it was introduced. Amid aggressive direct-to-consumer marketing by the drug maker, Vioxx quickly became a popular and widely used medication. As a result, the medication was linked to between 88,000 and 140,000 cases of serious heart disease before it was recalled. “Unfortunately, danger signals are not being detected early enough to prevent millions of patients from being exposed to unsafe drugs,” the researchers concluded. “Drugs approved after the enactment of PDUFA were more likely to receive a black-box warning or be withdrawn. Why might this be the case? One theory is that PDUFA-imposed deadlines may have caused rushed approvals, resulting in an increase in safety problems that were recognized only after a drug was already in use.” Researchers indicate that the rushed approvals may prevent the detection of serious drug side effects, resulting in patients being exposed for months or years to dangerous drugs before they are withdrawn or the proper warnings are put into place. They also theorized that faster approval times may compromise the quality of clinical trial evidence. The study’s authors suggested that patients and doctors wait until a drug has been on the market for a considerable amount of time before making it a go-to treatment. The consumer watchdog group, Public Citizen, which advocates a grace period for new drugs, touted the study’s findings in a press release this week. “The FDA is under constant pressure to rush new drugs through the pipeline to approval. In its hurry, the FDA is apparently failing to distinguish useful drugs from toxic ones, and more dangerous drugs are slipping through,” lead study author Cassie Frank, MD, an instructor of medicine at Harvard medical School and a physician in the Cambridge Health Alliance said in the press release. “By the time many drugs receive serious safety warnings, millions of Americans have already been exposed to their side effects, which can sometimes be fatal. As a doctor, I try to keep my patients safe by avoiding new drugs, when there are similar, older ones available.” Tags: Drug Recall, Merck, Vioxx More Lawsuit Stories Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 July 8, 2025 Mead Johnson Must Face Enfamil NEC Lawsuit in Missouri State Court July 8, 2025 FanDuel Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Fantasy Games Constitute Illegal Sports Gambling July 8, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 (Posted: yesterday) A mediator has been appointed to oversee settlement discussions between parties involved in an Oxbryta class action lawsuit, which claims the recalled drug endangered sickle cell disease patients. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITWrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (06/05/2025)Oxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025) Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (Posted: 2 days ago) A BioZorb side effects lawsuit indicates that a woman is suffering chronic pain and soreness after the tissue marker implant failed to absorb into her body as advertised. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025) Second Wave of Valsartan Cancer Lawsuits To Be Ready for Bellwether Trials by January 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A new schedule for a second wave of Valsartan cancer lawsuit bellwether trials hopes to have a case ready to go before a jury by January 2026. MORE ABOUT: VALSARTAN LAWSUITCourt Outlines Valsartan Lawsuits Trial Schedule for “Wave 2” Bellwether Cases (05/28/2025)Order Requires Valsartan Recall Lawsuits To Provide Product Identification for Specific Generic Drug Makers Named (03/27/2025)Deadlines Leading to First Valsartan Bellwether Trial on Sept. 8, 2025 Outlined by Special Master (03/04/2025)
Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 (Posted: yesterday) A mediator has been appointed to oversee settlement discussions between parties involved in an Oxbryta class action lawsuit, which claims the recalled drug endangered sickle cell disease patients. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITWrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (06/05/2025)Oxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025)
Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (Posted: 2 days ago) A BioZorb side effects lawsuit indicates that a woman is suffering chronic pain and soreness after the tissue marker implant failed to absorb into her body as advertised. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)
Second Wave of Valsartan Cancer Lawsuits To Be Ready for Bellwether Trials by January 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A new schedule for a second wave of Valsartan cancer lawsuit bellwether trials hopes to have a case ready to go before a jury by January 2026. MORE ABOUT: VALSARTAN LAWSUITCourt Outlines Valsartan Lawsuits Trial Schedule for “Wave 2” Bellwether Cases (05/28/2025)Order Requires Valsartan Recall Lawsuits To Provide Product Identification for Specific Generic Drug Makers Named (03/27/2025)Deadlines Leading to First Valsartan Bellwether Trial on Sept. 8, 2025 Outlined by Special Master (03/04/2025)