Skip Navigation

Eligible for a Depo-Provera lawsuit?

Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles

Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles

Just more than a year after all federal Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits were consolidated before one judge as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL), a group of attorneys has been reappointed to serve the interests of all women who have filed claims alleging that the birth control injections caused them to develop brain tumors.

Depo-Provera is a birth control injection introduced by Pfizer in 1992, designed to be administered once every three months. Over the last three decades, it has been heavily promoted, with tens of millions of women receiving the shots.

Concerns about Depo-Provera meningioma side effects emerged in April 2024, following the publication of a study warning that women receiving the birth control injections appeared to face a five-fold greater risk of developing brain tumors.

In the weeks that followed, a series of Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits began to be filed, as women started connecting their own diagnoses to years of receiving the “Depo shot.”

As lawsuits continued to be filed in courts across the United States, the growing number of federal cases were ultimately centralized last February for coordinated pretrial proceedings in the Northern District of Florida before U.S. District Judge M. Casey Rodgers. At that time, only 27 product liability lawsuits had been filed against Pfizer and generic manufacturers. However, one year later, the litigation has grown to include more than 3,000 claims.

Given the widespread use of the drug, Depo-Provera meningioma lawyers expect the litigation to continue expanding, as more women learn they may have developed brain tumors linked to the injections.

Depo-Provera-Lawsuit-Settlement
Depo-Provera-Lawsuit-Settlement

Upon assignment, Judge Rodgers quickly moved the litigation forward by selecting five “pilot” trials to be prepared as early bellwether test cases, signaling an effort to efficiently evaluate key issues that will shape the broader proceedings.

These early trials are designed to show how juries may respond to the scientific evidence, expert testimony and legal arguments expected to be repeated throughout the litigation, despite differences in individual claims. The outcomes are expected to play a critical role in guiding potential settlement discussions in the Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits.

To help manage the growing number of claims, Judge Rodgers also appointed a group of plaintiffs’ attorneys to serve in leadership roles, coordinating discovery and pretrial efforts on behalf of all individuals involved. In a court order (PDF) issued on March 20, she reappointed approximately 70 attorneys to these positions, citing the group’s effectiveness in advancing the litigation so far.

“The leadership work thus far has been exemplary, and the Court appreciates the efforts and interest of all attorneys who reapplied.”

– U.S. District Judge M. Casey Rodgers

The reappointed attorneys will continue to work on preparing the first bellwether lawsuits for trial, with the first Depo-Provera trial scheduled to begin on December 7, 2026. It will involve a lawsuit filed by Donna Toney of Florida, who alleges she suffered vertigo, dizziness and hearing loss due to a brain tumor caused by the birth control injections. Additional bellwether trials will follow in early 2027.

If the parties are unable to reach a global Depo-Provera brain tumor settlement after the bellwether process, Judge Rodgers could remand the remaining cases back to their original federal courts for individual trial dates.

To stay up to date on this litigation, sign up to receive Depo-Provera lawsuit updates sent directly to your inbox.

Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Abbott Laboratories faces a lawsuit from a North Carolina woman who says sales representatives repeatedly tried to reprogram a spinal cord stimulator that had already failed due to other problems.
Plaintiffs in Uber driver sexual assault lawsuits have asked a federal judge to approve a Common Benefit Funds motion, which is usually a sign of some form of settlement agreement.