Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Dermal Fillers To Require New FDA Label Warning Over Accidental Injections May 29, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsFederal drug regulators are requiring new warning labels about the risk of problems from soft tissue fillers, indicating that when the injections are used in certain areas of the face individuals may be more prone to suffer serious and permanent side effects. ย The FDA issued a safety alert on May 28, ordering soft tissue filler manufacturers to update their warning labels, after a review of adverse health reports found that certain areas around the face may be more prone to unintentional blood vessel injection that may result in embolization, occlusion of the vessels, ischemia, or infarction.The products reviewed by the FDA are soft tissue fillers, which are also commonly called dermal fillers, injectable facial implants, or wrinkle fillers that are solutions injected in certain areas of the face to give a smoother or fuller appearance of the face. The injections are administered directly into a treatment area where a patient may wish to smooth wrinkles or to augment lips or cheeks. These products are approved by the FDA and used by healthcare professionals such as dermatologists, plastic surgeons, cosmetic surgeons, dentists, and various other medical providers.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONWhen the injections are administered, there is a risk that the needle and solution could strike a blood vessel causing blocked blood vessels and restrict blood supply to tissues, and in some cases this can result in embolization, which means the solution could travel and settle in other parts of the body.An FDA analysis of injury and adverse health reports identified serious, and in some cases permanent, injuries to patients when the injections unintentionally struck a blood vessel during administration. Patient injury reports have included vision impairment, blindness, stroke and damage or death of the skin and underlying facial structures.The FDAโs analysis of these injury reports concluded that injection sites anywhere on the face pose potential dangers, but areas where majority of injury reports were recorded happened from injections sites around the eyebrows, nose, forehead, and eyes. The unintentional injection of dermal fluids in blood vessels around these specific areas could have long-term side effects and if not properly treated could cause life threatening consequences such as cerebral ischemia or cerebral hemorrhaging.After the FDAโs review of the significant dangers dermal fillers pose, the agency reviewed the productโs warning labels and has decided to elaborate on the potential side effects listed on the warning labels. The agency will be working with dermal filler manufacturers to add additional warnings, precautions, and other statements about the risk of unintentional injection into blood vessels so that healthcare physicians and patients have a better understanding of the dangers.The FDA recommends that dermal filler injections always be administered by healthcare providers who have the appropriate training, experience, and knowledge about the anatomy surrounding the injections site. These types of injections should never be self-performed or administered by friends or family in the home. Healthcare professionals who administer these injections should be aware of the anatomy surrounding the injection site and should understand that blood vessel anatomy can vary among patients, the warning indicates.Adverse side effects from unintentional injection into blood vessels will show somewhat immediate signs and symptoms such as changes in vision, signs of a stroke, create a white appearance of the skin, or cause unusual pain during or shortly after the procedure. Patients who experience any of these signs should seek immediate medical attention.Although the FDA states in the warning that the possibility of blood vessel intrusion is very small during these procedures, the potential side effects are severe and long-lasting enough that patients and healthcare professionals should be warned prior to receiving or administering the injections. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Dermal Filler, Plastic SurgeryMore Lawsuit Stories Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients July 23, 2026 LINX Device Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin in June 2027 July 23, 2026 Tavneos Lawsuits Over Liver Injury Side Effects May Follow Recall Proposals July 23, 2026 2 Comments Donald September 3, 2017 I was treated with a dermal filler approximately 5 years ago. The area has itched but now the itching is severe and sometimes wakes from sleeping. Some level of itching is almost constant. I was also told by a second Dr. that under eye bags cannot be successfully treated with a derma filler. Is there a way to stop the itching? Rebecca May 31, 2015 I am experiencing this right now. Please tell me what is the solution to dissolve this gel in blood stream. I am under doctor care and taking 6 meds to control symptoms. This is awful. I am very ill from this procedure. Great warning but MORE MUST BE DONE. Where is the mandatory protocol in office for adverse reactions? Regulate and train. I hope that I survive this malpractice and personal injury. LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (Posted: today)Lawsuit alleges Abbott Laboratories sold defective spinal cord stimulators that left 17 patients with worsening pain and neurological injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Boston Scientific Sales Reps Made Unauthorized Device Adjustments (07/13/2026)Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026) Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (Posted: yesterday)A former pest control worker has filed a chlorpyrifos lawsuit alleging that decades of mixing and spraying the insecticide caused Parkinsonโs disease, as lawyers investigate similar claims involving routine occupational and agricultural exposure.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023)New Guidance For Chlorpyrifos Pesticide Residue In Food Issued By Federal Regulators (02/14/2022) Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: 2 days ago)A Dupixent cancer lawsuit claims the manufacturers failed to adequately test and label the eczema treatment, resulting in a CTCL cancer diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (06/17/2026)Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)
Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (Posted: today)Lawsuit alleges Abbott Laboratories sold defective spinal cord stimulators that left 17 patients with worsening pain and neurological injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Boston Scientific Sales Reps Made Unauthorized Device Adjustments (07/13/2026)Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (Posted: yesterday)A former pest control worker has filed a chlorpyrifos lawsuit alleging that decades of mixing and spraying the insecticide caused Parkinsonโs disease, as lawyers investigate similar claims involving routine occupational and agricultural exposure.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023)New Guidance For Chlorpyrifos Pesticide Residue In Food Issued By Federal Regulators (02/14/2022)
Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: 2 days ago)A Dupixent cancer lawsuit claims the manufacturers failed to adequately test and label the eczema treatment, resulting in a CTCL cancer diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (06/17/2026)Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)