Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Design Ideas Toy Magnet Recall Issued Due to Child Ingestion Risk March 10, 2014 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsNearly 27,000 office and refrigerator magnet sets have been recalled, due to a risk that small magnetic pieces may detach from the products, posing a serious risk for young children who may swallow the magnets and suffer intestinal obstructions.ย A Design Ideas magnets recall was announced by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) on March 6, 2014, involving miniature magnets sold in the shapes of a duck, blowfish and a “splat”.The products contain a small, detachable magnet that is affixed to the underside. If a child accidentally swallows the magnetic pieces, there is a chance the strong magnetic pieces may attract across the magnetic walls, potentially causing intestinal obstructions, perforations, sepsis, or even death.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe recalled magnets have the following model numbers and design: Duck with model number 3205121 and 993205114, Blowfish with model number 3205122, and Splat with model number 3205078. The magnets were sold in sets of four or six and have โMagnetsโ and the Design Ideas logo on the front of the packaging.The products were manufactured in China under Design Ideas Ltd., of Springfield, Illinois where the Rubber ducky magnets were sold at Nordstromโs Rack stores, novelty and gift stores, book stores, and art stores nationwide from March 2007 through September 2013 for about $10. The Blowfish magnets were sold at novelty and gift stores as well as book stores nationwide from 2007 through March 2011 for about $10. The Splat magnets were sold at CB2 stores, novelty and gift stores, office supply stores and art venues nationwide from November 2012 to February 2014 for roughly $10.Toy Magnet RisksSince the summer of 2012, the CPSC has been focused on the risks associated with magnet sets and toys. Many of products featuring powerful, rare earth magnets, which can be formed into various shapes, have been recalled because regulators have discovered that warning labels do not work.Last year, a study produced by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) National Conference highlighted how there have been an increasing number of pediatric ingestion injuries associated with powerful neodymium-iron-boron magnets in recent years.Researchers found that since 2001, there have been 94 magnets related injuries out of roughly 2,700 ingestion incidents, with the majority of the problems occurring over the last three years, coinciding with the recent increase in popularity of toy magnet sets that often feature various shinny and bright colored shapes.Of the incidents reported, the average age of patients treated was 4.5 years old. From those 94 incidents reported there have been six children who required immediate surgery to remove the magnets and 10 cases were the magnets had to be removed endoscopically.In 2012, the CPSC requested that 13 manufacturers issue a voluntary recall for all magnetic ball toys, which feature hundreds of rare earth magnets that can be formed into various shapes. Of the 13 companies notified, only 11 voluntarily removed the products from the market, leading the agency to file rare administrative complaints to force a ย Buckyball recallย andย Zen Magnets recall after the manufacturers failed to cooperate. The administrative complaints are a more aggressive way to force a recall of dangerous products which has not had to be done in 11 years.The CPSC recommends customers stop using the recalled magnets and immediately put them out of childrenโs reach and contact Design Ideas at 800-426-6394 or visit them online at www.designideas.net to receive information on how to obtain a refund. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Buckballs, Children Toy Recall, Magnets Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit September 10, 2026 Dupixent Side Effects Caused CTCL, Tumors, Lawsuit Alleges September 10, 2026 LG Electric Range Lawsuit Alleges Defective Controls Caused House Fire September 10, 2026 0 Comments InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026) Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026) Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit September 10, 2026
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)
Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)