Dow Chemical To Pay $294M To Clean Up Air Pollution at U.S. Chemical Plants

To resolve claims filed by the U.S. Justice Department, Dow Chemical Company must spend nearly $300 million to upgrade air pollution controls at its petrochemical facilities.

The Department of Justice, in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental protection Agency (EPA) and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ), filed charges against Dow Chemical and two of its subsidiaries, Performance Materials NA Inc. and Union Carbide Corporation on January 19, alleging the companies failed to comply with environmental standards with its release of โ€œoversteamedโ€ industrial flares from its facility. It also failed to meet โ€œkey operating parameters,โ€ which should have ensured hazardous air pollutants were effectively combusted in the flares.

A Dow Chemical settlement agreement was announced the same day the charges were filed, indicating that at least $294 million will be spent to place new and upgraded air pollution controls at its petrochemical facilities in Hahnville, Louisiana; Plaquemine, Louisiana; Freeport, Texas; and Orange, Texas. The company is also agreeing to pay a civil penalty of $3 million.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

In a January 20 press release, the Justice Department indicates the agreement will reduce the amount of volatile organic compounds by more than 5,600 tons per year; and would reduce toxic air pollutants by 500 tons per year.

โ€œThis settlement will improve air quality in Texas and Louisiana by eliminating thousands of tons of harmful air pollution each year,โ€ Jonathan D. Brightbill, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Departmentโ€™s Environmental and Natural Resources Division, said in the press release. โ€œThe agreement, which requires Dow to reduce emissions from its facilities in Texas and Louisiana, demonstrates the Justice Departmentโ€™s and EPAโ€™s continuing efforts, together with our state partners, to reduce harmful air pollution from unnecessary and improper flaring in order to protect the American public by bringing sources of air pollution into compliance with the Clean Air Act.โ€

The flares are releases of waste gases, and intended to combust and burn them off so they do not pollute the air. The better operated and maintained the flares are, the more efficient they are at destroying waste gases instead of releasing them into the atmosphere.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโ€™s chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.
A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.