Dupixent Side Effects May Increase Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Risks

Dupixent Side Effects May Increase Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Risks

Using Dupixent to treat eczema may come at the cost of increased cancer risks that are not shared by similar drugs, according to the findings of a recent study.

A report published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) in June, adds to growing concerns about a potential link between Dupixent and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a rare cancer that is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Dupixent (dupilumab) was developed by Sanofi and Regeneron, and launched in 2017, as a treatment for various inflammatory conditions among both adults and children as young as six months, who cannot control atopic dermatitis with topical treatments.

CTCL is a cancer of the body’s T-lymphocytes. Its symptoms often resemble eczema, including scaly, itchy rashes that may progress into thickened patches or tumors. When detected early, patients have about a 90% survival rate at 10 years, but that rate falls to just over 50% if the Dupixent cancer is diagnosed at advanced stages.

Although typically slow-growing and marked by long periods of remission, CTCL has no known cure.

As a result of these serious and potentially life-threatening side effects, which the manufacturers have not adequately warned about, lawyers are now reviewing Dupixent lawsuits for individuals diagnosed with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving the injection.

Dupixent-Lawsuit
Dupixent-Lawsuit

Led by Dr. Shamir Geller from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, the team of researchers conducted a cohort study of examining cancer incidents reported at the center between the date when the drug was first approved and 2024, comparing data on Dupixent to competing drugs, including Rinvoq, Adbry and Adtralza.

“Cases of dupilumab treatment followed by cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) diagnosis have been reported since dupilumab was approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in 2017. The nature of this association is controversial: it may reflect dupilumab unmasking an underlying CTCL, dupilumab promoting lymphoid-reaction… or CTCL developing in patients with advanced long-standing AD, regardless of treatment.”

— Dr. Shamir Geller, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

According to their analysis, the center saw 30 patients who were exposed to Dupixent and developed CTCL since 2017. There were no cases of CTCL developing in patients with any of the other eczema treatments, the researchers report.

The researchers note data published by Dr. Geller in JAAD in January showed people taking Dupixent were nearly nine times more likely to report a CTCL diagnosis to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse reporting system, compared to those who did not take the drug.

Dr. Geller’s team concluded that their findings challenge any claims that the lymphoma is caused by eczema and called for additional research.

Similar conclusions were reached in another study posted in JAAD in August 2024, which was conducted by Dr. Robert T. Brodell of the University of Mississippi Medical Center.

Sign up for more health and legal news that could affect your or your family.


Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES