Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
E-Cigarette Manufacturers Have 10 Months To Apply For Application To Keep From Being Banned: Court Ruling July 22, 2019 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Manufacturers of electronic cigarette have only 10 months to reapply for federal approval to sell their vape pens and other products, or sale of the devices will be banned in the United States, according to a federal judge. U.S. District Judge Paul W. Grimm issued a memorandum opinion and order (PDF) on July 12, which grants a motion by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) that called for a firm deadline. The Academy won a lawsuit against the FDA in May 2019, tossing out an extension granted to e-cigarette manufacturers by the agency in 2017, which provided more time for manufacturers to seek federal approval for their products under the FDA’s authority to control tobacco regulations. The AAP filed a motion for summary judgment, and Judge Grimm determined that the deadline to reapply is ten months from his ruling. LEARN MORE ABOUT VAPE PEN AND E-CIG LAWSUITS Serious lung injuries, respiratory illnesses, and nicotine addiction have been linked to a wide range of vaping products, including e-cigarettes and THC vape pens. Lawsuits are being pursued against manufacturers for failing to warn users about these risks. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About VAPE PEN AND E-CIG LAWSUITS Serious lung injuries, respiratory illnesses, and nicotine addiction have been linked to a wide range of vaping products, including e-cigarettes and THC vape pens. Lawsuits are being pursued against manufacturers for failing to warn users about these risks. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION โBalancing the need to address the existing public health crisis among todayโs youth, which both parties acknowledge, and the need to avoid creating an additional public health crisis if e-cigarette availability dropped so precipitously as to push users to combusted tobacco products, and considering both the FDAโs laudable efforts to guide the premarket approval process and the Industryโs lack of effort to obtain approval without an imminent deadline, I will impose a ten-month deadline for submissions and a one-year deadline for approval, as the FDA suggested,โ Judge Grimm ruled. FDA Acting Commissioner Norman Sharpless responded to the ruling in a July 15 press release, saying the FDA is ready to accelerate the review process and that it has become concerned over the brewing health crisis of teen vaping. In addition, he said the FDA will continue to take vigorous enforcement action to keep e-cigarettes away from children. Sharpless noted that the FDA issued nearly 4,000 warning letters and more than 665 fines against retailers for illegal sales of e-cigarettes and vaping products to minors from April 2018 to April 2019. Additional public education efforts will also be launched by the FDA later this month, including television spots and new posters for high schools. E-Cigarette Approval Process Last month, following Judge Grimmโs initial decision to toss the extension, the FDA announced final guidance on how e-cigarette manufacturers should seek official authorization to market Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), which includes e-cigarettes, vapes, and all liquids used by them. All past, present and future e-cigarette manufacturers will be required to go through a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) if they want to continue to sell products in the U.S. It is unclear how strict the FDA will be, with those on one side of the issue fearing the FDA will rubber-stamp the approvals, and others concerned that the agency will make the approval process a de facto ban. The final guidance issued by the FDA lists a series of recommendations for manufacturers to consider when submitting their application. This includes instructions on explaining how they intend to market their products in a way that discourages teen and underage use. The guidance also warns that manufacturers should provide details on how they intend to prevent lithium ion batteries used in e-cigarettes from exploding. Both teen use and battery explosions have been major focuses of the agency, particularly the issue of underage use. Last year, the agency announced a plan to remove many of the flavored e-cigarettes products from store shelves, which are believed to be behind the increasing teen use of the tobacco products. The policy was directed at all flavors used in e-cigarettes except tobacco, mint or menthol-flavored products, as the agency recognized these flavors are typically used by adults transitioning away from traditional cigarette smoking. E-cigarette use has quickly become the most popular form of tobacco use among teens, with rates jumping 78 percent from 2017 to 2018, according to the FDA. In 2011, when the FDA first said it would regulate e-cigarettes, only 1.5 percent of teens vaped, but now more than one-third of teens use e-cigarettes as they have become increasingly popular among all age ranges. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found nearly 14% of middle school students, and 38% of high school students reported having used e-cigarettes. Among use in the last 30 days from when the survey was taken, five percent of middle schoolers and 16% of high school students reported having used vaping devices. In April 2019, the FDA warned that it had received at least 35 reports ofย seizures linked to electronic cigarettesย since 2010, and believes many more may have gone unreported. The agency is currently investigating the problem, which preliminary indications suggest occur more often in younger users. In addition to increased regulatory actions, a number of manufacturers face vaping addiction and injury lawsuits filed in courts nationwide. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Battery, Children, Electronic Cigarette, Explosion, Juul, Lithium Ion Batteries, Vaping More JUUL E-Cigarette Vape Lawsuit Stories More Than Half of U.S. Teens Who Vape Do So To Deal With Stress, Anxiety: Study November 18, 2024 On-Line Retailers Receive FDA Warning Letter Over Illegal Sale of Disposable E-Cigarettes May 7, 2024 Vaping Causes Same DNA Damage as Smoking, Study Finds April 12, 2024 0 Comments InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Hair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (Posted: yesterday) Attorneys involved in hair relaxer lawsuits have selected two groups of claims they say should be chosen to represent thousands of similar cancer claims. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITLawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026) Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) Both Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific are fighting against a call by plaintiffs to consolidate all spinal cord stimulator lawsuits before one federal judge for pretrial proceedings. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Problems Resulted in Burning Pain, Shocks From SCS Leads: Lawsuit (03/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (03/10/2026)Lawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026) Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (Posted: 5 days ago) More than 4,000 women across the U.S. have filed product liability lawsuits and medical monitoring class action claims seeking compensation for potential brain tumor symptoms and side effects allegedly caused by Depo-Provera. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)Nearly 4,000 Women Are Pursuing a Depo-Provera Lawsuit After Developing Brain Tumors (03/04/2026)Long-Term Side Effects of Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma and Hearing Loss, Lawsuit Says (02/26/2026)
On-Line Retailers Receive FDA Warning Letter Over Illegal Sale of Disposable E-Cigarettes May 7, 2024
Hair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (Posted: yesterday) Attorneys involved in hair relaxer lawsuits have selected two groups of claims they say should be chosen to represent thousands of similar cancer claims. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITLawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)Court Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)
Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) Both Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific are fighting against a call by plaintiffs to consolidate all spinal cord stimulator lawsuits before one federal judge for pretrial proceedings. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Problems Resulted in Burning Pain, Shocks From SCS Leads: Lawsuit (03/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (03/10/2026)Lawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)
Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (Posted: 5 days ago) More than 4,000 women across the U.S. have filed product liability lawsuits and medical monitoring class action claims seeking compensation for potential brain tumor symptoms and side effects allegedly caused by Depo-Provera. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)Nearly 4,000 Women Are Pursuing a Depo-Provera Lawsuit After Developing Brain Tumors (03/04/2026)Long-Term Side Effects of Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma and Hearing Loss, Lawsuit Says (02/26/2026)