Despite Bladder Cancer Risk, Actos Still Valid Treatment: European Comm.

European health officials have determined that Actos is still a valid treatment for diabetes, despite serious concerns about the potential risk of bladder cancer from Actos. 

A recent decision by the European Commission backs the findings of the European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medical Products for Human Use (CHMP), which last summer ruled against an Actos recall.

The decision contradicts the determinations of two of the European Union’s most powerful member states; France and Germany. Those two countries pulled Actos from shelves following a French study conducted by insurance companies which found that Actos side effects increased the risk of bladder cancer.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The European Commission’s ruling means that a stronger label warning and more intense patient screening is all Actos will face in Europe outside of France and Germany.

Actos (pioglitazone) was approved by the FDA to treat Type 2 Diabetes in July, 1999. It is a once-a-day pill that increases the body’s sensitivity to insulin. The medication has grown in popularity in recent years, generating $4.3 billion in sales last year.

In the United States, FDA officials began reviewing the potential risk of Actos bladder cancer problems in September 2010, after interim data from an on-going 10 year study found that users may face an increased risk the longer they take the drug.

Over the past year, a growing number of Actos bladder cancer lawsuits have been filed against Takeda Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the drug maker concealed their knowledge that users may face an increased risk of bladder cancer and failed to provide adequate warnings to patients and the medical community.

All Actos lawsuits filed in federal courts throughout the United States have been consolidated and centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Lawsuits over Ozempic and Wegovy vision loss will be consolidated for pretrial proceedings in New Jersey, separate from claims involving gastrointestinal injuries.
Former Becton Dickinson safety officer Dr. Hooman Noorchashm warns that the company’s GalaFLEX mesh is being used off-label in breast reconstruction without FDA approval, as lawsuits investigate whether the manufacturer failed to warn about its potential risks.
A series of case management conferences have been scheduled for hair relaxer litigation throughout 2026, leading up to expected bellwether trials in 2027.